Suppr超能文献

气胸患者在拔管前夹闭胸引。

Clamping of chest drain before removal in spontaneous pneumothorax.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, nil, Hong Kong, China.

Clinical Research Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar 17;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01398-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In spontaneous pneumothorax, clamping the chest drain before its removal may avoid reinsertion in case of early recurrence, but may be unsafe and may prolong hospital stay. The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of early recurrence in both clamped and unclamped pneumothorax episodes, and factors associated with it.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of primary and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax episodes in which chest drain was inserted during the period April 2012 to March 2014.

RESULTS

Data of 122 episodes were analysed. There were 36 primary pneumothorax and 86 secondary pneumothorax episodes. Mean age was 59 years with 92% males. Clamping of the chest drain was done in 68 episodes (55.7%), and not done in 54. The clamping group was significantly younger, had more primary pneumothorax, and had shorter time from cessation of air leak to clamp/removal. Recurrence within 24 h were seen in 12 (17.6%) clamped episodes and 4 (7.4%) non-clamped episodes, although in only eight episodes were reinsertion of chest drain saved. Significantly more previous pneumothorax episodes were seen in the early recurrence group. We observed no new onset of tension pneumothorax or subcutaneous emphysema associated with clamping.

CONCLUSION

The practice of clamping the chest drain before removal in spontaneous pneumothorax appear safe. Clamping saved chest drain reinsertion in 11.8% of cases, and has the potential to save more if clamped for up to 24 h. However, clamping may result in more early recurrences. Prospective randomised studies are needed.

摘要

背景

在自发性气胸患者中,在拔除胸腔引流管之前夹闭引流管可以避免早期复发时重新插入,但可能不安全且可能延长住院时间。本研究的目的是检查夹闭和未夹闭气胸发作中的早期复发发生率,以及与之相关的因素。

方法

回顾性分析 2012 年 4 月至 2014 年 3 月期间因原发性和继发性自发性气胸插入胸腔引流管的病例。

结果

共分析了 122 例气胸发作,其中原发性气胸 36 例,继发性气胸 86 例。平均年龄为 59 岁,92%为男性。68 例(55.7%)夹闭了胸腔引流管,54 例未夹闭。夹闭组患者年龄明显较小,原发性气胸较多,从停止漏气到夹闭/拔管的时间较短。夹闭组 24 小时内复发 12 例(17.6%),未夹闭组 4 例(7.4%),但仅在 8 例中挽救了胸腔引流管的重新插入。早期复发组的既往气胸发作次数明显更多。我们未观察到与夹闭相关的新发张力性气胸或皮下气肿。

结论

在自发性气胸患者中,在拔除胸腔引流管之前夹闭引流管的做法似乎是安全的。夹闭可使 11.8%的病例避免重新插入胸腔引流管,如果夹闭时间不超过 24 小时,则可能会挽救更多病例。但是,夹闭可能会导致更多的早期复发。需要前瞻性随机研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/701d/7968250/ab567ebcc54f/13019_2021_1398_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验