Danzy Shamika, Lowen Anice C, Steel John
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
J Virol. 2021 May 10;95(11). doi: 10.1128/JVI.02320-20. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Efforts to estimate the risk posed by potentially pandemic influenza A viruses (IAV), and to understand the mechanisms governing interspecies transmission, have been hampered by a lack of animal models that yield relevant and statistically robust measures of viral fitness. To address this gap, we monitored several quantitative measures of fitness in a guinea pig model: infectivity, magnitude of replication, kinetics of replication, efficiency of transmission, and kinetics of transmission. With the goal of identifying metrics that distinguish human- and non-human-adapted IAV we compared strains derived from humans to those circulating in swine and canine populations. Influenza A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2), A/Netherlands/602/2009 (H1N1), A/swine/Kansas/77778/2007 (H1N1), A/swine/Spain/53207/2004 [M1 P41A] (H1N1), and A/canine/Illinois/41915/2015 (H3N2) viruses were evaluated. Our results revealed higher infectivity and faster kinetics of viral replication and transmission for human and canine strains compared to the swine viruses. Conversely, peak viral titers and efficiency of transmission were higher for human strains relative to both swine and canine IAVs. Total viral loads were comparable among all strains tested. When analyzed together, data from all strains point to peak viral load as a key driver of transmission efficiency and replication kinetics as a key driver of transmission kinetics. While the dose initiating infection did not strongly impact peak viral load, dose was found to modulate kinetics of viral replication and, in turn, timing of transmission. Taken together, our results point to peak viral load and transmission efficiency as key metrics differentiating human and non-human IAVs and suggest that high peak viral load precipitates robust transmission.Influenza pandemics occur when an IAV from non-human hosts enters the human population and adapts to give rise to a lineage capable of sustained transmission among humans. Despite recurring zoonotic infections involving avian or swine adapted IAVs, influenza pandemics occur infrequently because IAVs typically exhibit low fitness in a new host species. Anticipating when a zoonosis might lead to a pandemic is both critical for public health preparedness and extremely challenging. The approach to characterizing IAVs reported here is designed to aid risk assessment efforts by generating rigorous and quantitative data on viral phenotypes relevant for emergence. Our data suggest that the ability to replicate to high titers and transmit efficiently irrespective of initial dose are key characteristics distinguishing IAVs that have established sustained circulation in the human population from IAVs that circulate in non-human mammalian hosts.
由于缺乏能够产生有关病毒适应性的相关且具有统计学稳健性指标的动物模型,对潜在大流行性甲型流感病毒(IAV)构成的风险进行评估以及了解跨物种传播机制的努力受到了阻碍。为了填补这一空白,我们在豚鼠模型中监测了几个适应性的定量指标:感染性、复制量、复制动力学、传播效率和传播动力学。为了确定区分适应人类和非人类的IAV的指标,我们将源自人类的毒株与在猪和犬类群体中传播的毒株进行了比较。对甲型流感/巴拿马/2007/99(H3N2)、甲型流感/荷兰/602/2009(H1N1)、甲型流感/猪/堪萨斯/77778/2007(H1N1)、甲型流感/猪/西班牙/53207/2004 [M1 P41A](H1N1)和甲型流感/犬/伊利诺伊/41915/2015(H3N2)病毒进行了评估。我们的结果显示,与猪病毒相比,人类和犬类毒株具有更高的感染性以及更快的病毒复制和传播动力学。相反,人类毒株相对于猪和犬类IAV的病毒滴度峰值和传播效率更高。所有测试毒株的总病毒载量相当。综合分析时,所有毒株的数据表明病毒载量峰值是传播效率的关键驱动因素,而复制动力学是传播动力学的关键驱动因素。虽然引发感染的剂量对病毒载量峰值影响不大,但发现剂量可调节病毒复制动力学,进而调节传播时间。综上所述,我们的结果表明病毒载量峰值和传播效率是区分人类和非人类IAV的关键指标,并表明高病毒载量峰值促成了强劲的传播。当来自非人类宿主的IAV进入人类群体并适应后产生能够在人类中持续传播的谱系时,就会发生流感大流行。尽管涉及适应禽类或猪的IAV的人畜共患病感染反复出现,但流感大流行很少发生,因为IAV通常在新宿主物种中表现出低适应性。预测人畜共患病何时可能导致大流行对公共卫生防范至关重要且极具挑战性。本文报道的表征IAV的方法旨在通过生成与病毒出现相关的严格定量病毒表型数据来辅助风险评估工作。我们的数据表明,无论初始剂量如何,能够复制到高滴度并有效传播的能力是区分已在人类群体中建立持续传播的IAV与在非人类哺乳动物宿主中传播的IAV的关键特征。