Kelly Marguerite, Mitchell Imogen, Walker Iain, Mears Jane, Scholz Brett
Medical School, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Medical School, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Mar;13(1):1-14. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002973. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Natural disasters are becoming more frequent and severe, and place additional strains on end-of-life care services and users. Although end-of-life and palliative care are considered essential components of disaster planning and response, there are gaps in understandings about their real-life application, and how natural disasters impact end-of-life care.
To synthesise existing evidence of the impacts of natural disasters (eg, bushfires, communicable pandemics, etc) on end-of-life care.
A systematic review with a narrative synthesis was undertaken. The review was registered on PROSPERO (registration: CRD42020176319). PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Science Direct and Web of Science were searched for studies published in English between 2003 and 2020, with findings explicitly mentioning end-of-life care impacts in relation to a natural disaster. Articles were appraised for quality using a JBI-QARI tool.
Thirty-six empirical studies met the inclusion criteria and quality assessment. Findings were synthesised into three key themes: impacts on service provision, impacts on service providers and impacts on service users. This review demonstrates that natural disasters impact profoundly on end-of-life care, representing a stark departure from a palliative care approach.
Clinical practitioners, policy makers and researchers must continue to collaborate for viable solutions to achieve universal access to compassionate and respectful end-of-life care, during natural disasters. Using models, policies and practices already developed in palliative care, involving those most impacted in disaster planning and anticipating barriers, such as resource shortages, enables development of end-of-life care policies and practices that can be rapidly implemented during natural disasters.
自然灾害正变得愈发频繁和严重,给临终关怀服务及使用者带来了额外压力。尽管临终关怀和姑息治疗被视为灾害规划与应对的重要组成部分,但对于它们在实际生活中的应用以及自然灾害如何影响临终关怀,仍存在认识上的差距。
综合现有关于自然灾害(如森林火灾、传染病大流行等)对临终关怀影响的证据。
进行了一项采用叙述性综合的系统评价。该评价已在PROSPERO上注册(注册号:CRD42020176319)。检索了PubMed、Scopus、PsycINFO、Science Direct和Web of Science,以查找2003年至2020年期间发表的英文研究,其研究结果明确提及了与自然灾害相关的临终关怀影响。使用JBI-QARI工具对文章质量进行评估。
三十六项实证研究符合纳入标准并通过质量评估。研究结果综合为三个关键主题:对服务提供的影响、对服务提供者的影响以及对服务使用者的影响。本综述表明,自然灾害对临终关怀产生了深远影响,与姑息治疗方法形成了鲜明对比。
临床医生、政策制定者和研究人员必须继续合作,以寻求可行的解决方案,以便在自然灾害期间实现普遍获得富有同情心和尊重的临终关怀。利用姑息治疗中已制定的模式、政策和实践,让受灾最严重的人群参与灾害规划并预见资源短缺等障碍,有助于制定在自然灾害期间能够迅速实施的临终关怀政策和实践。