Suppr超能文献

消费者和护理人员在姑息治疗学术和实践中的领导作用:系统评价与叙述性综合。

Consumer and carer leadership in palliative care academia and practice: A systematic review with narrative synthesis.

机构信息

1 Medical School, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.

2 Consumer Representative, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):959-968. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854012. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contemporary health policies call for consumers to be part of all aspects of service planning, implementation, delivery and evaluation. The extent to which consumers are part of the systemic decision-making levels of palliative care appears to vary between and within services and organisations.

AIM

The aim of this systematic review is to develop understandings about consumer and carer leadership in palliative care.

DESIGN

A systematic, narrative synthesis approach was adopted due to the heterogeneity of included studies. The review was registered on PROSPERO prospectively (PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018111625).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO were searched for all studies published in English specifically focusing on consumers' leadership in palliative care organisations and systems. Articles were appraised for quality using a modified JBI-QARI tool.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria and quality assessment. Consumers are currently involved in leadership of palliative care teaching, research and services. Findings highlight the benefits of consumer leadership in palliative care including more relevant, higher-quality services, teaching and research. Across the included studies, it was not clear the extent to which consumer leaders had influence in relation to setting agendas across the palliative care sector.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that more could be done to support consumer leadership within palliative care. Academics and clinicians might improve the relevance of their work if they are able to more meaningfully partner with consumers in systemic roles in palliative care.

摘要

背景

当代卫生政策呼吁消费者参与服务规划、实施、提供和评估的各个方面。消费者在姑息治疗的系统决策层面上的参与程度似乎因服务和组织而异。

目的

本系统评价旨在了解姑息治疗中的消费者和护理者的领导作用。

设计

由于纳入研究的异质性,采用了系统的叙述性综合方法。该综述在 PROSPERO 前瞻性注册(PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018111625)。

资料来源

在 PubMed、Scopus 和 PsycINFO 上搜索了所有专门关注消费者在姑息治疗组织和系统中的领导作用的英文发表的研究。使用修改后的 JBI-QARI 工具对文章进行了质量评估。

结果

符合纳入标准和质量评估的有 11 项研究。消费者目前参与姑息治疗教学、研究和服务的领导工作。研究结果强调了消费者在姑息治疗中的领导作用的益处,包括更相关、更高质量的服务、教学和研究。在纳入的研究中,消费者领导者在多大程度上对姑息治疗领域的议程设置产生影响尚不清楚。

结论

研究结果表明,可以在姑息治疗中做更多的工作来支持消费者的领导作用。如果学术人员和临床医生能够在姑息治疗的系统角色中与消费者更有意义地合作,他们的工作可能会更具相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验