Saccuzzo D P, Callahan L A, Madsen J
Doctoral Training Facility, San Diego State University, California 92182-0551.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Jun;176(6):368-71. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198806000-00007.
Contrary to both theoretical and empirical findings, Romney equates associative cognitive dysfunction with other manifestations of thought disorder. Moreover, he overstates the case for the documentation of thought disorder in the families of schizophrenics. We discuss his reaction to Callahan and Saccuzzo in the context of four major issues. We conclude that the evidence for thought disorder in the families of schizophrenics is weak and inconclusive. We call for more rigorous research as well as the exploration of viable alternatives.
与理论和实证研究结果相反，罗姆尼将联想性认知功能障碍与思维障碍的其他表现等同起来。此外，他夸大了精神分裂症患者家庭中思维障碍记录的情况。我们在四个主要问题的背景下讨论了他对卡拉汉和萨库佐的回应。我们得出结论，精神分裂症患者家庭中思维障碍的证据薄弱且尚无定论。我们呼吁进行更严格的研究，并探索可行的替代方案。
