Heber Stefan, Laky Markus, Anscheringer Isabella, Wolschner Lukas, Mussbacher Marion, Krammer Teresa, Haririan Hady, Schrottmaier Waltraud C, Volf Ivo, Hackl Matthias, Moritz Andreas, Assinger Alice
Center for Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute of Physiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 1;12:613515. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.613515. eCollection 2021.
Platelets are involved in a variety of diseases, making their adequate functional assessment is essential. However, due to their easily activatable nature this has some methodological pitfalls. Therefore, the availability of stable, easily measurable surrogate markers would be beneficial. In this regard, some evidence suggests that certain microRNAs (miRNAs) circulating in plasma might be useful. We aimed to corroborate their suitability by analyzing plasma samples obtained in a randomized controlled trial, which assessed the effects of periodontal treatment on platelet function. We hypothesized that miRNA levels mirror changes of platelet activation and -function. Both platelet function and miRNA abundance were quantified using state-of-the-art flow cytometry and qPCR methods. The following miRNAs were quantified: 223-3p, 150-5p, 197-3p, 23a-3p, 126-3p, 24-3p, 21-5p, 27b-3p, 33a-5p, 320a, 191-5p, 28-3p, 451a, 29b-3p, and 1-3p. However, periodontal treatment did not affect the abundance of any investigated miRNAs to a relevant extent. Platelet activation and reactivity indices did neither correlate with any tested miRNA at baseline, nor after the treatment period. In addition, there was no evidence that investigated miRNAs were released by platelets, as suggested previously. In conclusion, our data suggest that in patients suffering from periodontal disease the investigated miRNAs are unlikely to be suitable biomarkers for platelet function. Our data aim to raise awareness that previously determined platelet activation dependent circulating miRNAs are not suitable as platelet biomarkers in all cohorts.
血小板参与多种疾病,因此对其进行充分的功能评估至关重要。然而,由于其易于激活的特性,这存在一些方法学上的缺陷。因此,稳定、易于测量的替代标志物的可用性将是有益的。在这方面,一些证据表明血浆中循环的某些微小RNA(miRNA)可能有用。我们旨在通过分析在一项随机对照试验中获得的血浆样本,来证实它们的适用性,该试验评估了牙周治疗对血小板功能的影响。我们假设miRNA水平反映血小板激活和功能的变化。使用最先进的流式细胞术和qPCR方法对血小板功能和miRNA丰度进行了定量。对以下miRNA进行了定量:223-3p、150-5p、197-3p、23a-3p、126-3p、24-3p、21-5p、27b-3p、33a-5p、320a、191-5p、28-3p、451a、29b-3p和1-3p。然而,牙周治疗并未在相关程度上影响任何所研究miRNA的丰度。血小板激活和反应性指标在基线时以及治疗期后均与任何测试的miRNA均无相关性。此外,没有证据表明所研究的miRNA如先前所示是由血小板释放的。总之,我们的数据表明,在患有牙周疾病的患者中,所研究的miRNA不太可能是血小板功能的合适生物标志物。我们的数据旨在提高人们的认识,即先前确定的依赖血小板激活的循环miRNA在所有队列中都不适合作为血小板生物标志物。