• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不确定性的信息论特征区分了大脑中意外与准确性信号。

Information Theoretic Characterization of Uncertainty Distinguishes Surprise From Accuracy Signals in the Brain.

作者信息

Loued-Khenissi Leyla, Preuschoff Kerstin

机构信息

Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2020 Feb 28;3:5. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00005. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2020.00005
PMID:33733125
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7861235/
Abstract

Uncertainty presents a problem for both human and machine decision-making. While utility maximization has traditionally been viewed as the motive force behind choice behavior, it has been theorized that uncertainty minimization may supersede reward motivation. Beyond reward, decisions are guided by belief, i.e., confidence-weighted expectations. Evidence challenging a belief evokes surprise, which signals a deviation from expectation (stimulus-bound surprise) but also provides an information gain. To support the theory that uncertainty minimization is an essential drive for the brain, we probe the neural trace of uncertainty-related decision variables, namely confidence, surprise, and information gain, in a discrete decision with a deterministic outcome. Confidence and surprise were elicited with a gambling task administered in a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, where agents start with a uniform probability distribution, transition to a non-uniform probabilistic state, and end in a fully certain state. After controlling for reward expectation, we find confidence, taken as the negative entropy of a trial, correlates with a response in the hippocampus and temporal lobe. Stimulus-bound surprise, taken as Shannon information, correlates with responses in the insula and striatum. In addition, we also find a neural response to a measure of information gain captured by a confidence error, a quantity we dub accuracy. BOLD responses to accuracy were found in the cerebellum and precuneus, after controlling for reward prediction errors and stimulus-bound surprise at the same time point. Our results suggest that, even absent an overt need for learning, the human brain expends energy on information gain and uncertainty minimization.

摘要

不确定性对人类和机器的决策都构成了一个问题。虽然传统上效用最大化被视为选择行为背后的驱动力,但理论认为不确定性最小化可能会取代奖励动机。除了奖励之外,决策还受到信念的引导,即信心加权期望。挑战信念的证据会引发惊讶,这既表明与预期存在偏差(刺激引发的惊讶),也提供了信息增益。为了支持不确定性最小化是大脑的一种基本驱动力这一理论,我们在一个具有确定性结果的离散决策中,探究与不确定性相关的决策变量(即信心、惊讶和信息增益)的神经痕迹。在一项功能磁共振成像实验中通过赌博任务来引发信心和惊讶,在该实验中,参与者从均匀概率分布开始,过渡到非均匀概率状态,最后处于完全确定的状态。在控制了奖励期望之后,我们发现,将信心视为一次试验的负熵,它与海马体和颞叶的反应相关。将刺激引发的惊讶视为香农信息,它与脑岛和纹状体的反应相关。此外,我们还发现了对由信心误差捕获的信息增益度量(我们将这个量称为准确性)的神经反应。在同时控制了奖励预测误差和刺激引发的惊讶之后,在小脑和楔前叶中发现了对准确性的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)反应。我们的结果表明,即使没有明显的学习需求,人类大脑也会在信息增益和不确定性最小化上消耗能量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/a269d6675df7/frai-03-00005-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/efefbe1644e9/frai-03-00005-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/90ebe7fb4e78/frai-03-00005-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/3cd99c855e40/frai-03-00005-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/3a125025f091/frai-03-00005-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/a269d6675df7/frai-03-00005-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/efefbe1644e9/frai-03-00005-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/90ebe7fb4e78/frai-03-00005-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/3cd99c855e40/frai-03-00005-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/3a125025f091/frai-03-00005-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d3e/7861235/a269d6675df7/frai-03-00005-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Information Theoretic Characterization of Uncertainty Distinguishes Surprise From Accuracy Signals in the Brain.不确定性的信息论特征区分了大脑中意外与准确性信号。
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Feb 28;3:5. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00005. eCollection 2020.
2
Pupil dilation signals uncertainty and surprise in a learning gambling task.在学习性赌博任务中,瞳孔扩张表明不确定性和惊讶。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jan 3;7:218. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00218. eCollection 2013.
3
Anterior insula reflects surprise in value-based decision-making and perception.前脑岛反映了基于价值的决策和感知中的惊讶。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116549. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116549. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
4
Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline's Role in Decision Making.瞳孔扩张信号表示惊讶:去甲肾上腺素在决策中的作用的证据。
Front Neurosci. 2011 Sep 30;5:115. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00115. eCollection 2011.
5
Brain signals of a Surprise-Actor-Critic model: Evidence for multiple learning modules in human decision making.惊奇行动者-评论家模型的脑信号:人类决策中多个学习模块的证据。
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 1;246:118780. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118780. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
6
Evidence for surprise minimization over value maximization in choice behavior.选择行为中惊喜最小化而非价值最大化的证据。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 13;5:16575. doi: 10.1038/srep16575.
7
Uncertainty and Surprise Jointly Predict Musical Pleasure and Amygdala, Hippocampus, and Auditory Cortex Activity.不确定性和惊喜共同预测音乐愉悦感以及杏仁核、海马体和听觉皮层的活动。
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 2;29(23):4084-4092.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.067. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Auditory and reward structures reflect the pleasure of musical expectancies during naturalistic listening.听觉和奖赏结构反映了自然聆听过程中音乐期待所带来的愉悦感。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Oct 19;17:1209398. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1209398. eCollection 2023.
9
More widespread and rigid neuronal representation of reward expectation underlies impulsive choices.奖励预期更广泛且刻板的神经元表征是冲动选择的基础。
bioRxiv. 2024 Apr 12:2024.04.11.588637. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.11.588637.
10
Spatiotemporal neural characterization of prediction error valence and surprise during reward learning in humans.人类在奖励学习过程中预测误差效价和惊喜的时空神经特征。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 6;7(1):4762. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04507-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Limited Evidence for Probabilistic Cueing Effects on Grating-Evoked Event-Related Potentials and Orientation Decoding Performance.关于概率性线索对光栅诱发的事件相关电位和方向解码性能影响的有限证据。
Psychophysiology. 2025 May;62(5):e70076. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70076.
2
Gambling on others' health: risky pro-social decision-making in the era of COVID-19.拿他人健康冒险:新冠疫情时代危险的亲社会决策
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 19;15:1370778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370778. eCollection 2024.
3
Ecstatic or Mystical Experience through Epilepsy.

本文引用的文献

1
State anxiety biases estimates of uncertainty and impairs reward learning in volatile environments.状态焦虑会影响不确定性的估计,并在不稳定的环境中损害奖励学习。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117424. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Anterior insula reflects surprise in value-based decision-making and perception.前脑岛反映了基于价值的决策和感知中的惊讶。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116549. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116549. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
3
The value of uncertainty: An active inference perspective.不确定性的价值:主动推理视角。
癫痫引发的狂喜或神秘体验。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Sep 1;35(9):1372-1381. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02031.
4
Microgravity induces overconfidence in perceptual decision-making.微重力会导致感知决策过度自信。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 15;13(1):9727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36775-0.
5
Bounded rational decision-making models suggest capacity-limited concurrent motor planning in human posterior parietal and frontal cortex.有界理性决策模型表明,人类顶后和额皮质存在容量有限的并发运动规划。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 13;18(10):e1010585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010585. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
The effect of uncertainty on pain decisions for self and others.不确定性对自身和他人疼痛决策的影响。
Eur J Pain. 2022 May;26(5):1163-1175. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1940. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
7
The oculomotor signature of expected surprise.期待性惊喜的眼球运动特征。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 15;12(1):2543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06403-4.
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Jan;42:e47. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002066.
4
The role of the hippocampus in weighting expectations during inference under uncertainty.在不确定情况下进行推理时,海马体在权衡预期中的作用。
Cortex. 2019 Jun;115:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
5
Editors' Introduction and Review: An Appraisal of Surprise: Tracing the Threads That Stitch It Together.编辑介绍和评论:对惊喜的评价:追踪将其缝合在一起的线索。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):37-49. doi: 10.1111/tops.12402. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Learning From Surprise: Harnessing a Metacognitive Surprise Signal to Build and Adapt Belief Networks.从意外中学习:利用元认知意外信号构建和适应信念网络。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):164-177. doi: 10.1111/tops.12397. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Dopaminergic basis for signaling belief updates, but not surprise, and the link to paranoia.多巴胺能系统是信号更新信念的基础,但不是惊讶的基础,并且与妄想有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 23;115(43):E10167-E10176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809298115. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Does predictive coding have a future?预测编码有未来吗?
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Aug;21(8):1019-1021. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0200-7.
9
Implications of Information Theory for Computational Modeling of Schizophrenia.信息论对精神分裂症计算模型的启示
Comput Psychiatr. 2017 Oct 1;1:82-101. doi: 10.1162/CPSY_a_00004. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
Computational Neuropsychology and Bayesian Inference.计算神经心理学与贝叶斯推理
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 23;12:61. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00061. eCollection 2018.