• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于研究个体词汇语法变异的计算社会语言学方法。

. Computational Sociolinguistic Methods for Investigating Individual Lexico-grammatical Variation.

作者信息

Schmid Hans-Jörg, Würschinger Quirin, Fischer Sebastian, Küchenhoff Helmut

机构信息

Department of English and American Studies, LMU, Munich, Germany.

Statistical Consulting Unit StaBLab, Department of Statistics, LMU, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2021 Jan 26;3:547531. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.547531. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2020.547531
PMID:33733205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7861319/
Abstract

The present study deals with variation in the use of lexico-grammatical patterns and emphasizes the need to embrace individual variation. Targeting the pattern that's adj (as in , or ) as a case study, we use a tailor-made Python script to systematically retrieve grammatical and semantic information about all instances of this construction in BNC2014 as well as sociolinguistic information enabling us to study social and individual lexico-grammatical variation among speakers who have used this pattern. The dataset amounts to 4,394 tokens produced by 445 speakers using 159 adjective types in 931 conversations. Using detailed descriptive statistics and mixed-effects regression models, we show that while the choice of some adjectives is partly determined by social variables, situational and especially individual variation is rampant overall. Adopting a cognitive-linguistic perspective and relying on the notion of entrenchment, we interpret these findings as reflecting individual speakers' routines. We argue that computational sociolinguistics is in an ideal position to contribute to the data-driven investigation of individual lexico-grammatical variation and encourage computational sociolinguists to grab this opportunity. For the routines of individual speakers ultimately both underlie and compromise systematic social variation and trigger and steer well-known types of language change including grammaticalization, pragmaticalization and change by invited inference.

摘要

本研究探讨词汇语法模式使用中的变异,并强调接纳个体变异的必要性。以“adj(如 或 )”这种模式为案例研究对象,我们使用一个特制的Python脚本,系统地检索BNC2014中该结构所有实例的语法和语义信息,以及社会语言学信息,使我们能够研究使用该模式的说话者之间的社会和个体词汇语法变异。该数据集包含445名说话者在931次对话中使用159种形容词类型产生的4394个词元。通过使用详细的描述性统计和混合效应回归模型,我们表明,虽然某些形容词的选择部分由社会变量决定,但情境变异尤其是个体变异总体上非常普遍。从认知语言学的角度出发,依靠固化的概念,我们将这些发现解释为反映了个体说话者的惯常做法。我们认为,计算社会语言学非常适合为个体词汇语法变异的数据驱动研究做出贡献,并鼓励计算社会语言学家抓住这个机会。因为个体说话者的惯常做法最终既构成系统的社会变异的基础,又对其产生影响,还引发并引导包括语法化、语用化和通过邀请推理产生的变化等著名的语言变化类型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/f107c4c6ee31/frai-03-547531-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/df5a0776525d/frai-03-547531-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/9dcb54e44835/frai-03-547531-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/f5f419b157b3/frai-03-547531-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/a020f5109fe8/frai-03-547531-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/be5148f80a67/frai-03-547531-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/d9e2cf283418/frai-03-547531-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/d4cf3b21a560/frai-03-547531-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/0557c8174e74/frai-03-547531-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/f107c4c6ee31/frai-03-547531-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/df5a0776525d/frai-03-547531-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/9dcb54e44835/frai-03-547531-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/f5f419b157b3/frai-03-547531-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/a020f5109fe8/frai-03-547531-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/be5148f80a67/frai-03-547531-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/d9e2cf283418/frai-03-547531-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/d4cf3b21a560/frai-03-547531-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/0557c8174e74/frai-03-547531-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0edc/7861319/f107c4c6ee31/frai-03-547531-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
. Computational Sociolinguistic Methods for Investigating Individual Lexico-grammatical Variation.用于研究个体词汇语法变异的计算社会语言学方法。
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Jan 26;3:547531. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.547531. eCollection 2020.
2
Editors' Introduction and Review: Sociolinguistic Variation and Cognitive Science.编者引言与综述:社会语言学变异与认知科学。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Oct;10(4):679-695. doi: 10.1111/tops.12384. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
3
Personae in sociolinguistic variation.社会语言学变异中的角色。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;11(6):e1543. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1543. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Adjective position in the code-switched speech of Spanish and Papiamento heritage speakers in the Netherlands: Individual differences and methodological considerations.荷兰西班牙语和帕皮阿门托语母语者语码转换言语中的形容词位置:个体差异与方法学考量
Front Psychol. 2023 May 2;14:1136023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136023. eCollection 2023.
5
Language Structures May Adapt to the Sociolinguistic Environment, but It Matters What and How You Count: A Typological Study of Verbal and Nominal Complexity.语言结构可能会适应社会语言环境,但重要的是你计算的内容和方式:一项关于动词和名词复杂性的类型学研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1141. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01141. eCollection 2018.
6
African American English intensifier : Using twitter to investigate syntactic change in low-frequency forms.非裔美国英语强化词:利用推特研究低频形式的句法变化。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jan 27;5:683104. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.683104. eCollection 2022.
7
Societies of strangers do not speak less complex languages.陌生人社会的语言并不简单。
Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 18;9(33):eadf7704. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf7704. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
8
Lexico-syntactic features are activated but not selected in bare noun production: Electrophysiological evidence from overt picture naming.词法-句法特征在裸名生成中被激活但未被选择:来自显性图片命名的电生理证据。
Cortex. 2019 Jul;116:294-307. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 31.
9
Using speakers' referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning.利用说话者的指称意图对早期跨情境词汇学习进行建模。
Psychol Sci. 2009 May;20(5):578-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02335.x. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
10
Sociolinguistic variables and cognition.社会语言学变量与认知。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):701-716. doi: 10.1002/wcs.152. Epub 2011 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Communicative predictions can overrule linguistic priors.交际预测可以推翻语言先验。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 14;7(1):17581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17907-9.
2
Predictive coding.预测编码。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep;2(5):580-593. doi: 10.1002/wcs.142. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
3
Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists.重复性分析:高斯分布与非高斯分布数据的实用指南(适用于生物学家)
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Nov;85(4):935-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00141.x.
4
The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?自由能原理:一个统一的大脑理论?
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38. doi: 10.1038/nrn2787. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
5
Structural priming: a critical review.结构启动效应:一项批判性综述。
Psychol Bull. 2008 May;134(3):427-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427.
6
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.迈向对话的机械心理学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2004 Apr;27(2):169-90; discussion 190-226. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x04000056.
7
Chunking mechanisms in human learning.人类学习中的组块机制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Jun 1;5(6):236-243. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01662-4.