• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同适应证下经口内镜下肌切开术(Heller 肌切开术)后再次干预和再次手术的发生率。

The incidence of reintervention and reoperation following Heller myotomy across multiple indications.

机构信息

Division of Bariatric, Foregut, and Advanced Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Health Sciences Center, T19-053, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8191, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1619-1626. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08357-6. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-021-08357-6
PMID:33733323
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is a debilitating primary esophageal motility disorder. Heller myotomy (HM) is a first-line therapy for the treatment of achalasia patients who have failed other modalities. Other indications for HM include diverticulum, diffuse esophageal spasm, and esophageal strictures. However, long-term outcomes of HM are unclear. This study aims to assess incidence of reintervention, either endoscopically or through minimally invasive or resectional procedures, in patients who underwent HM in New York State.

METHODS

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) administrative longitudinal database identified 1817 adult patients who underwent HM between 2000 and 2008 for achalasia, esophageal diverticulum, diffuse esophageal spasm, and esophageal strictures, based on ICD-9 and CPT codes. Through the use of unique identifiers, patients requiring reintervention were tracked up to 2016 (for at least 8 years follow-up). Primary outcome was incidence of subsequent procedures following HM. Secondary outcomes were time to reintervention and risk factors for reintervention.

RESULTS

Of the 1817 patients who underwent HM, 320 (17.6%) required subsequent intervention. Of the 320 patients, 234 (73.1%) underwent endoscopic reinterventions, 54 (16.9%) underwent minimally invasive procedures, and 32 (10%) underwent resectional procedures as their initial revisional intervention. Of the 234 patients who underwent endoscopic reintervention as their initial revisional procedure, only 40 (16.8%) required subsequent surgical procedures. Over a mean follow-up of 7.0 years, the mean time to a subsequent procedure was 4.3 ± 3.74 years. Reintervention rates after 10 years following HM for achalasia, diverticulum ,and other indication were 24.4%, 12.6%, and 37%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The majority of HM reinterventions were managed solely by endoscopic procedures (60.6%). Heller myotomy remains an excellent procedure to prevent surgical reintervention for achalasia and diverticulum.

摘要

介绍

贲门失弛缓症是一种衰弱性原发性食管动力障碍。Heller 肌切开术(HM)是治疗其他治疗方法失败的贲门失弛缓症患者的一线疗法。HM 的其他适应证包括憩室、弥漫性食管痉挛和食管狭窄。然而,HM 的长期疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估在纽约州接受 HM 治疗的患者再次接受内镜或微创或切除术的干预发生率。

方法

州规划和研究合作系统(SPARCS)行政纵向数据库根据 ICD-9 和 CPT 代码确定了 1817 例 2000 年至 2008 年间因贲门失弛缓症、食管憩室、弥漫性食管痉挛和食管狭窄接受 HM 治疗的成年患者。通过使用唯一标识符,对需要再次干预的患者进行跟踪随访至 2016 年(至少 8 年随访)。主要结局是 HM 后再次手术的发生率。次要结局是再次干预的时间和再次干预的危险因素。

结果

在接受 HM 的 1817 例患者中,有 320 例(17.6%)需要后续干预。在这 320 例患者中,234 例(73.1%)接受了内镜再次干预,54 例(16.9%)接受了微创治疗,32 例(10%)接受了切除术作为初始修正干预。在 234 例接受内镜再次干预作为初始修正手术的患者中,只有 40 例(16.8%)需要后续手术。在平均 7.0 年的随访中,再次手术的平均时间为 4.3±3.74 年。HM 治疗贲门失弛缓症、憩室和其他适应证 10 年后的再干预率分别为 24.4%、12.6%和 37%。

结论

大多数 HM 再次干预仅通过内镜治疗(60.6%)。Heller 肌切开术仍然是预防贲门失弛缓症和憩室手术再次干预的极好方法。

相似文献

1
The incidence of reintervention and reoperation following Heller myotomy across multiple indications.不同适应证下经口内镜下肌切开术(Heller 肌切开术)后再次干预和再次手术的发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1619-1626. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08357-6. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Reintervention After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: Is It Inevitable?贲门失弛缓症 Heller 肌切开术后再干预:是否不可避免?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Mar;107(3):860-867. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.059. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
3
Minimally invasive Heller myotomy with partial posterior fundoplication for the treatment of achalasia: long-term results from a tertiary referral center.微创 Heller 肌切开术联合部分胃底折叠术治疗贲门失弛缓症:来自三级转诊中心的长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):728-735. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08341-0. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia: a single-center experience.经口内镜肌切开术与腹腔镜 Heller 肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的长期疗效比较:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):792-801. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07450-6. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
5
Long-term outcome of peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia in patients with previous Heller myotomy.曾接受过贲门肌层切开术的食管失弛缓症患者经口内镜下肌切开术的长期疗效
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2596-2601. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5267-1. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
6
Laparoscopic Revisional Surgery After Failed Heller Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Long-Term Outcome at a Single Tertiary Center.腹腔镜修正手术治疗食管失弛缓症 Heller 肌切开术失败:单中心长期疗效。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep;25(9):2208-2217. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05041-x. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
7
Is peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) more effective than pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是否比气囊扩张和 Heller 肌切开术更有效?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):1949-1962. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08353-w. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
8
Revisional Therapy for Recurrent Symptoms After Heller Myotomy for Achalasia.贲门失弛缓症 Heller 肌切开术后复发性症状的修正治疗。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jan;26(1):64-69. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05098-8. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
9
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia with previous Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口内镜肌切开术治疗既往行 Heller 肌切开术的贲门失弛缓症患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):47-56.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.056. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
10
Heller myotomy is the optimal index procedure for esophageal achalasia in adolescents and young adults.Heller 肌切开术是青少年和年轻成人食管失弛缓症的最佳适应证。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3355-3360. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06625-6. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy an adequate anti-reflux operation after esophagogastric myotomy?在食管胃肌切开术后,Roux-en-Y胃空肠吻合术是一种足够的抗反流手术吗?
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11817-y.
2
Recurrent dysphagia after myotomy for achalasia: pneumatic dilation or POEM? : Which modality offers superior outcomes?贲门失弛缓症肌切开术后反复吞咽困难:气囊扩张还是 POEM?哪种方法的疗效更优?
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4812-4817. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09556-5. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
Robotic redo Heller myotomy: how I do it?

本文引用的文献

1
Spatio-temporal Analysis for New York State SPARCS Data.纽约州SPARCS数据的时空分析
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2017 Jul 26;2017:483-492. eCollection 2017.
2
Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia.内镜下气囊扩张术与肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗原发性贲门失弛缓症的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(12):CD005046. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005046.pub3. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
机器人重行 Heller 肌切开术:我是怎么做的?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Jun;407(4):1721-1726. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02553-1. Epub 2022 May 18.