• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外国直接投资和政府支出对韩国环境污染的影响:重新审视污染避难所假说

The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited.

作者信息

Bulus Gokay Canberk, Koc Suleyman

机构信息

Department of Economics, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray, Turkey.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(28):38238-38253. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13462-z. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-13462-z
PMID:33733418
Abstract

This paper uses the pollution haven hypothesis (PHH) to examine the effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) and government expenditures on environmental quality in Korea. For this purpose, we conducted autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds testing for the period 1970-2018. Empirical results indicate that in Korea, increased FDI, per capita gross domestic product (GDP), energy use, and imports have led to increased per capita carbon dioxide (CO) emissions, while government expenditures, renewable energy, and exports have led to decreased per capita CO emissions. Empirical results also reveal an N-shaped relationship between per capita GDP and per capita CO emissions. Moreover, the PHH is valid in Korea to a moderate degree, and the detrimental effect of FDI on environmental quality is relatively limited. Furthermore, government expenditures improve environmental quality. These empirical findings support Korea's leading role in implementing comprehensive green growth initiatives.

摘要

本文运用污染避难所假说(PHH)来检验外国直接投资(FDI)和政府支出对韩国环境质量的影响。为此,我们对1970 - 2018年期间进行了自回归分布滞后(ARDL)边界检验。实证结果表明,在韩国,外国直接投资增加、人均国内生产总值(GDP)、能源使用和进口导致人均二氧化碳(CO)排放量增加,而政府支出、可再生能源和出口则导致人均CO排放量减少。实证结果还揭示了人均GDP与人均CO排放量之间呈N形关系。此外,污染避难所假说在韩国具有一定程度的有效性,外国直接投资对环境质量的不利影响相对有限。此外,政府支出改善了环境质量。这些实证研究结果支持了韩国在实施全面绿色增长倡议方面的主导作用。

相似文献

1
The effects of FDI and government expenditures on environmental pollution in Korea: the pollution haven hypothesis revisited.外国直接投资和政府支出对韩国环境污染的影响:重新审视污染避难所假说
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(28):38238-38253. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13462-z. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Cote d'Ivoire: evidence from autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach with structural breaks.探讨科特迪瓦的污染避难所假说:基于结构断点的自回归分布滞后 (ARDL) 方法的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(14):16886-16899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08246-w. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
Testing validity of the EKC hypothesis in South Korea: role of renewable energy and trade openness.检验韩国环境库兹涅茨曲线假说的有效性:可再生能源和贸易开放的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Aug;27(23):29043-29054. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09172-7. Epub 2020 May 18.
4
Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan: an exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach.巴基斯坦外国直接投资流入与环境恶化之间的关系:基于 ARDL 方法对污染避难所假说的探讨。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(13):15407-15425. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08083-x. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
5
Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from robust least square estimator.可再生能源消费、外国直接投资流入和经济增长对二氧化碳排放的调节和中介作用:稳健最小二乘估计的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2806-2819. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3837-6. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Environmental implication of offshore economic activities in Indonesia: a dual analyses of cointegration and causality.印度尼西亚近海经济活动的环境影响:协整和因果关系的双重分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):32460-32475. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06352-y. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
7
Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach.不同欧洲国家群体的外国直接投资、可再生能源和二氧化碳排放之间的相互关系:面板 ARDL 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jul;26(21):21495-21510. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05415-4. Epub 2019 May 24.
8
Are Air Pollution, Economic and Non-Economic Factors Associated with Per Capita Health Expenditures? Evidence from Emerging Economies.空气污染、经济和非经济因素与人均医疗支出有关吗?来自新兴经济体的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;16(11):1967. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111967.
9
FDI, exports, imports, and consumption-based CO emissions in the MENA region: spatial analysis.中东和北非地区的外国直接投资、出口、进口和消费导致的二氧化碳排放:空间分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(25):67634-67646. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27245-1. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
10
Do renewable energy and national patents impact the environmental sustainability of Tunisia?可再生能源和国家专利是否影响突尼斯的环境可持续性?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):25248-25262. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17628-7. Epub 2021 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The hidden costs of inflation: A critical analysis of industrial development and environmental consequences.通货膨胀的隐性成本:工业发展与环境后果的批判性分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 5;19(8):e0297413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297413. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of trade liberalization on the global decoupling and decomposition of CO emissions from economic growth.贸易自由化对全球碳排放与经济增长脱钩及分解的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 21;10(1):e23470. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23470. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
3
Will China-Africa trade increase Africa's carbon emissions?
中非贸易会增加非洲的碳排放吗?
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 17;18(11):e0289792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289792. eCollection 2023.
4
Causality and dynamic spillover effects of megacities on regional industrial pollution reduction.特大城市对区域工业污染减排的因果关系及动态溢出效应。
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 2;9(3):e14047. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14047. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Why are some countries cleaner than others? New evidence from macroeconomic governance.为什么有些国家比其他国家更清洁?来自宏观经济治理的新证据。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023;25(7):6167-6223. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02298-3. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
Does Environmental Regulation Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of Chinese Cities? A Threshold Effect Analysis Based on the Economic Development Level.基于经济发展水平的门槛效应分析:环境规制是否提高了中国城市的绿色全要素生产率?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 30;18(9):4828. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094828.