• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯设计和分析复杂干预措施的外部先导试验。

Bayesian design and analysis of external pilot trials for complex interventions.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2021 May 30;40(12):2877-2892. doi: 10.1002/sim.8941. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1002/sim.8941
PMID:33733500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7613966/
Abstract

External pilot trials of complex interventions are used to help determine if and how a confirmatory trial should be undertaken, providing estimates of parameters such as recruitment, retention, and adherence rates. The decision to progress to the confirmatory trial is typically made by comparing these estimates to pre-specified thresholds known as progression criteria, although the statistical properties of such decision rules are rarely assessed. Such assessment is complicated by several methodological challenges, including the simultaneous evaluation of multiple endpoints, complex multi-level models, small sample sizes, and uncertainty in nuisance parameters. In response to these challenges, we describe a Bayesian approach to the design and analysis of external pilot trials. We show how progression decisions can be made by minimizing the expected value of a loss function, defined over the whole parameter space to allow for preferences and trade-offs between multiple parameters to be articulated and used in the decision-making process. The assessment of preferences is kept feasible by using a piecewise constant parametrization of the loss function, the parameters of which are chosen at the design stage to lead to desirable operating characteristics. We describe a flexible, yet computationally intensive, nested Monte Carlo algorithm for estimating operating characteristics. The method is used to revisit the design of an external pilot trial of a complex intervention designed to increase the physical activity of care home residents.

摘要

外部先导试验常用于复杂干预措施,以帮助确定是否以及如何进行确证性试验,提供招募、保留和依从率等参数的估计值。进展到确证性试验的决定通常是通过将这些估计值与称为进展标准的预先指定阈值进行比较来做出的,尽管这些决策规则的统计性质很少得到评估。这种评估受到多个方法学挑战的影响,包括同时评估多个终点、复杂的多层次模型、样本量小以及混杂参数的不确定性。为了应对这些挑战,我们描述了一种用于设计和分析外部先导试验的贝叶斯方法。我们展示了如何通过最小化损失函数的期望值来做出进展决策,该损失函数定义在整个参数空间上,以允许在多个参数之间表达和使用偏好和权衡,从而进行决策。通过使用损失函数的分段常数参数化来保持偏好评估的可行性,该参数在设计阶段选择,以导致理想的操作特性。我们描述了一种灵活但计算密集的嵌套蒙特卡罗算法,用于估计操作特性。该方法用于重新设计旨在增加养老院居民身体活动的复杂干预措施的外部先导试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/0b800afe5369/EMS158429-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/ca05854b95d8/EMS158429-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/98a5b290e3ec/EMS158429-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/95ec987a09c6/EMS158429-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/110a17796e74/EMS158429-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/bac2d43d3289/EMS158429-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/3fa1f279f01c/EMS158429-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/0b800afe5369/EMS158429-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/ca05854b95d8/EMS158429-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/98a5b290e3ec/EMS158429-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/95ec987a09c6/EMS158429-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/110a17796e74/EMS158429-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/bac2d43d3289/EMS158429-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/3fa1f279f01c/EMS158429-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bf/7613966/0b800afe5369/EMS158429-f007.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian design and analysis of external pilot trials for complex interventions.贝叶斯设计和分析复杂干预措施的外部先导试验。
Stat Med. 2021 May 30;40(12):2877-2892. doi: 10.1002/sim.8941. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
A comparison of computational algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of clinical trials.临床试验贝叶斯分析的计算算法比较。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):689-700. doi: 10.1177/17407745241247334. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Designing a Bayesian adaptive clinical trial to evaluate novel mechanical ventilation strategies in acute respiratory failure using integrated nested Laplace approximations.设计一项贝叶斯自适应临床试验,使用集成嵌套拉普拉斯逼近法评估急性呼吸衰竭中新型机械通气策略。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jul;142:107560. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107560. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
A hypothesis test of feasibility for external pilot trials assessing recruitment, follow-up, and adherence rates.评估外部试点试验招募、随访和依从率的可行性的假设检验。
Stat Med. 2021 Sep 20;40(21):4714-4731. doi: 10.1002/sim.9091. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
5
Statistical challenges in assessing potential efficacy of complex interventions in pilot or feasibility studies.在试点或可行性研究中评估复杂干预措施潜在疗效时的统计挑战。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):997-1009. doi: 10.1177/0962280215589507. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
6
Bayesian methods for pilot studies.贝叶斯方法在初步研究中的应用。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):414-419. doi: 10.1177/1740774520914306. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
How are progression decisions made following external randomised pilot trials? A qualitative interview study and framework analysis.后续外部随机试验性试点研究中,进展决策是如何做出的?一项定性访谈研究和框架分析。
Trials. 2022 Feb 10;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06063-9.
8
Three-outcome designs for external pilot trials with progression criteria.具有进展标准的外部先导试验的三结局设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02351-x.
9
Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.基于二次损失函数的贝叶斯决策理论组序贯临床试验设计:频率学派评估
Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):5-14. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075764.
10
A behavioural Bayes approach to the determination of sample size for clinical trials considering efficacy and safety: imbalanced sample size in treatment groups.一种行为贝叶斯方法在临床试验中用于确定考虑疗效和安全性的样本量:处理组中不平衡的样本量。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Aug;20(4):389-400. doi: 10.1177/0962280209358131. Epub 2010 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Sample size justification in feasibility studies: moving beyond published guidance.可行性研究中的样本量合理性论证:超越已发表的指南
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jun 23;11(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01675-9.
2
Jointly assessing multiple endpoints in pilot and feasibility studies.在先导性研究和可行性研究中联合评估多个终点指标。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Mar;34(3):561-573. doi: 10.1177/09622802241311219. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
3
Three-outcome designs for external pilot trials with progression criteria.具有进展标准的外部先导试验的三结局设计。

本文引用的文献

1
Bayesian methods for pilot studies.贝叶斯方法在初步研究中的应用。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):414-419. doi: 10.1177/1740774520914306. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
Practical experiences of adopting assurance as a quantitative framework to support decision making in drug development.采用保证作为定量框架以支持药物研发决策的实践经验。
Pharm Stat. 2018 Jul;17(4):317-328. doi: 10.1002/pst.1856. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
Better decision making in drug development through adoption of formal prior elicitation.通过采用正式的先验信息获取在药物研发中做出更好的决策。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02351-x.
4
Using Bayesian statistics in confirmatory clinical trials in the regulatory setting: a tutorial review.在监管环境下的验证性临床试验中使用贝叶斯统计:教程综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 May 7;24(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02235-0.
Pharm Stat. 2018 Jul;17(4):301-316. doi: 10.1002/pst.1854. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
4
Are pilot trials useful for predicting randomisation and attrition rates in definitive studies: A review of publicly funded trials.先导试验对预测确定性研究中的随机化和损耗率是否有用:对公共资助试验的综述。
Clin Trials. 2018 Apr;15(2):189-196. doi: 10.1177/1740774517752113. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
5
A framework for prospectively defining progression rules for internal pilot studies monitoring recruitment.用于前瞻性定义内部试验研究监测招募进展规则的框架。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3612-3627. doi: 10.1177/0962280217708906. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
6
Research Exploring Physical Activity in Care Homes (REACH): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.养老院身体活动研究(REACH):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 19;18(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1921-8.
7
Informing efficient randomised controlled trials: exploration of challenges in developing progression criteria for internal pilot studies.为高效随机对照试验提供信息:探索内部预试验进展标准制定中的挑战。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013537.
8
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:随机试点和可行性试验的扩展》
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
9
Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework.为随机对照试验做准备时界定可行性研究和预试验:概念框架的构建
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205. eCollection 2016.
10
Sample size planning for phase II trials based on success probabilities for phase III.基于III期成功概率的II期试验样本量规划。
Pharm Stat. 2015 Nov-Dec;14(6):515-24. doi: 10.1002/pst.1717. Epub 2015 Sep 28.