• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在有管制的市场中,费用分担与卫生服务需求。

Cost sharing and the demand for health services in a regulated market.

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2021 Jun;30(6):1259-1275. doi: 10.1002/hec.4244. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4244
PMID:33733585
Abstract

This paper measures consumer responsiveness to cost sharing in healthcare using a regression discontinuity design. I use a novel and detailed claims-level dataset from the Colombian healthcare market, where the government exogenously determines a tier system for coinsurance rates and copays based on the enrollee's monthly income. I find that patients exposed to higher coinsurance rates demand fewer services relative to patients facing lower cost sharing. This reduction holds for both discretionary and preventive services. Lower utilization translates into lower costs, despite evidence that patients facing higher prices do not substitute away from more expensive providers.

摘要

本文使用回归间断设计来衡量医疗保健成本分担对消费者的反应。我使用了来自哥伦比亚医疗市场的新颖而详细的索赔级数据集,政府根据参保人的月收入人为确定共付额和自付额的等级制度。我发现,与面临较低成本分担的患者相比,面临较高共付额率的患者对服务的需求减少。这种减少既适用于任意服务,也适用于预防服务。尽管有证据表明,面对更高价格的患者不会从更昂贵的提供者那里转移,但较低的利用率转化为较低的成本。

相似文献

1
Cost sharing and the demand for health services in a regulated market.在有管制的市场中,费用分担与卫生服务需求。
Health Econ. 2021 Jun;30(6):1259-1275. doi: 10.1002/hec.4244. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Barrier to Access or Cost Share? Coinsurance and Dental-Care Utilization in Colombia.获取障碍还是成本分担?哥伦比亚的共同保险与牙科护理利用情况
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Oct;14(5):569-78. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0251-4.
3
The effects of patient cost-sharing on health expenditure and health among older people: Heterogeneity across income groups.患者自付费用对老年人健康支出和健康的影响:收入群体的异质性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Jul;23(5):847-861. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01399-6. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Assessment of Behavioral Health Services Use Among Low-Income Medicare Beneficiaries After Reductions in Coinsurance Fees.评估低收入医疗保险受益人的行为健康服务使用情况在降低共付费用后。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019854. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19854.
5
Cost-sharing and the utilization of clinical preventive services.费用分担与临床预防服务的利用
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Aug;17(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00057-4.
6
The effect of increasing the coinsurance rate on outpatient utilization of healthcare services in South Korea.提高韩国医疗保险自付率对门诊医疗服务利用的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2076-8.
7
A systematic umbrella review of the association of prescription drug insurance and cost-sharing with drug use, health services use, and health.系统综述 umbrella review 处方药保险与费用分担与药物使用、卫生服务使用和健康的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07554-w.
8
Patient Cost Sharing in Low Income Populations.低收入人群的患者费用分担
Am Econ Rev. 2010 May;100(2):303-8. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.2.303.
9
Out-of-Pocket Costs for Advanced Imaging Across the US Private Insurance Marketplace.美国私人保险市场高级影像检查的自付费用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):607-614.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
Healthcare Coinsurance Elasticity Coefficient Estimation Using Monthly Cross-sectional, Time-series Claims Data.使用月度横截面时间序列索赔数据估计医疗保健共保弹性系数
Health Econ. 2017 Jun;26(6):795-801. doi: 10.1002/hec.3341. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Sharing for Acupuncture Therapy in Commercial Insurance Plans.商业保险计划中针灸治疗的费用分摊
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 Aug 13;14:27536130251363903. doi: 10.1177/27536130251363903. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
A systematic review of strategies used for controlling consumer moral hazard in health systems.系统评价用于控制医疗体系中消费者道德风险的策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 18;22(1):1260. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08613-y.
3
Demand-side Interventions to Control Moral Hazard in Health Systems, Beneficial or Detrimental: A Systematic Review Study.
控制卫生系统中道德风险的需求侧干预措施:有益还是有害?一项系统评价研究
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Jun 27;36:69. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.69. eCollection 2022.
4
Understanding patient and physician responses to various cost-sharing programs for prescription drugs in South Korea: A multilevel analysis.理解韩国各种处方药共付计划对患者和医生的反应:多层次分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;10:924992. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924992. eCollection 2022.