• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加速康复外科(ERAS)方案下直肠肿瘤前切除术患者吻合口漏的危险因素:来自瑞典 ERAS 数据库的结果。

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Patients with Rectal Tumors Undergoing Anterior Resection within an ERAS Protocol: Results from the Swedish ERAS Database.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Surgery, Örebro & Institute of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Örebro University and University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2021 Jun;45(6):1630-1641. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06054-y. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-021-06054-y
PMID:33733700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8093169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research on risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) alone within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol has not yet been conducted. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for AL and study short-term outcome after AL in patients operated with anterior resection (AR).

METHODS

All prospectively and consecutively recorded patients operated with AR in the Swedish part of the international ERAS® Interactive Audit System (EIAS) between January 2010 and February 2020 were included. The cohort was evaluated regarding risk factors for AL and short-term outcomes, including uni- and multivariate analysis. Pre-, intra- and postoperative compliance to ERAS®Society guidelines was calculated and evaluated.

RESULTS

Altogether 1900 patients were included, 155 (8.2%) with AL and 1745 without AL. Male gender, obesity, peritoneal contamination, year of surgery 2016-2020, duration of primary surgery and age remained significant predictors for AL in multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in overall pre- and intraoperative compliance to ERAS®Society guidelines between groups. Only preadmission patient education remained as a significant ERAS variable associated with less AL. AL was associated with longer length of stay (LOS), higher morbidity rate and higher rate of reoperations.

CONCLUSION

Male gender, obesity, peritoneal contamination, duration of surgery, surgery later in study period, age and preadmission patient education were associated with AL in patients operated on with AR. Overall pre- and intraoperative compliance to the ERAS protocol was high in both groups and not associated with AL.

摘要

背景

在加速康复外科(ERAS)方案中,单独针对吻合口漏(AL)的危险因素的研究尚未进行。本研究旨在确定接受前切除术(AR)的患者发生 AL 的危险因素,并研究 AL 后的短期结果。

方法

纳入 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间在瑞典部分国际 ERAS® Interactive Audit System(EIAS)中接受 AR 的所有前瞻性连续记录患者。对 AL 患者的危险因素和短期结局进行评估,包括单因素和多因素分析。计算并评估了术前、术中及术后对 ERAS® Society 指南的依从性。

结果

共纳入 1900 例患者,其中 155 例(8.2%)发生 AL,1745 例未发生 AL。多因素分析显示,男性、肥胖、腹膜污染、手术年份 2016-2020、手术时间和年龄仍然是 AL 的显著预测因素。两组患者的术前和术中对 ERAS® Society 指南的总体依从性没有显著差异。只有入院前患者教育仍然是与 AL 发生率降低相关的重要 ERAS 变量。AL 与住院时间延长(LOS)、更高的发病率和更高的再手术率相关。

结论

在接受 AR 的患者中,男性、肥胖、腹膜污染、手术时间、研究后期手术、年龄和入院前患者教育与 AL 相关。两组患者的术前和术中对 ERAS 方案的总体依从性均较高,与 AL 无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b7/8093169/41674181449a/268_2021_6054_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b7/8093169/e21f9f5de801/268_2021_6054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b7/8093169/41674181449a/268_2021_6054_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b7/8093169/e21f9f5de801/268_2021_6054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b7/8093169/41674181449a/268_2021_6054_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage in Patients with Rectal Tumors Undergoing Anterior Resection within an ERAS Protocol: Results from the Swedish ERAS Database.加速康复外科(ERAS)方案下直肠肿瘤前切除术患者吻合口漏的危险因素:来自瑞典 ERAS 数据库的结果。
World J Surg. 2021 Jun;45(6):1630-1641. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06054-y. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colonic procedures within an ERAS-protocol. A retrospective cohort study from the Swedish part of the international ERAS-database.结直肠手术中吻合口漏的危险因素:国际快速康复外科数据库瑞典部分的回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg. 2024 Jul;48(7):1749-1758. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12205. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Short-term outcome in robotic vs laparoscopic and open rectal tumor surgery within an ERAS protocol: a retrospective cohort study from the Swedish ERAS database.机器人与腹腔镜和开放直肠肿瘤手术在加速康复外科(ERAS)方案中的短期结果:来自瑞典 ERAS 数据库的回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2006-2017. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08486-y. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
The effect of diverting stoma on postoperative morbidity after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients treated within an ERAS program.在加速康复外科(ERAS)项目中接受治疗的患者,行直肠癌低位前切除术后,造口改道对术后发病率的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jun;41(6):724-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.234. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
5
ERAS pathway in colorectal surgery: structured implementation program and high adherence for improved outcomes.结直肠手术中的 ERAS 路径:结构化实施计划和高度遵循以改善结果。
Updates Surg. 2021 Feb;73(1):123-137. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00885-5. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal tumour surgery: a cohort study.机器人与腹腔镜直肠肿瘤手术比较:一项队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Feb;21(2):191-199. doi: 10.1111/codi.14475. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
7
ERAS program adherence-institutionalization, major morbidity and anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery: the iCral2 multicenter prospective study.加速康复外科(ERAS)方案依从性-制度化、择期结直肠手术后主要发病率和吻合口漏:iCral2 多中心前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3965-3984. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08717-2. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
8
Improving postoperative outcome in rectal cancer surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in an era of increasing laparoscopic resection.提高直肠癌手术的术后效果:在腹腔镜切除日益增多的时代采用加速康复外科。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2769-2779. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02266-x. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
9
Enhanced recovery after surgery and mini-invasive approaches in rectal cancer surgery - short-term outcomes.直肠癌手术的术后快速康复和微创方法——短期结果。
Rozhl Chir. 2020 Winter;99(12):539-547.
10
ERAS protocol in laparoscopic surgery for colonic versus rectal carcinoma: are there differences in short-term outcomes?腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌与直肠癌的加速康复外科(ERAS)方案:短期结局是否存在差异?
Med Oncol. 2016 Jun;33(6):56. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0772-6. Epub 2016 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery.结直肠外科领域手术加速康复的最新研究成果与未来方向
Ewha Med J. 2023 Dec;46(Suppl 1):e23. doi: 10.12771/emj.2023.e23. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
2
Incidence and risk factors of blowout within 90 days after a primary Hartmann's procedure: a retrospective cohort study.原发性 Hartmann 手术后 90 天内发生爆裂的发生率和风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 14;408(1):275. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02967-5.
3
Predictors That Identify Complications Such As Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Age is an independent risk factor for increased morbidity in elective colorectal cancer surgery despite an ERAS protocol.尽管采用了 ERAS 方案,但年龄是择期结直肠癌手术发病率增加的独立危险因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Aug;405(5):673-689. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01930-y. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Reducing anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: The old dogmas and the new challenges.降低结直肠手术吻合口漏的风险:旧观念与新挑战。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 14;25(34):5017-5025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i34.5017.
3
Multicentre randomized clinical trial of colonic J pouch or straight stapled colorectal reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
识别结直肠手术中诸如吻合口漏等并发症的预测因素:一项系统综述。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 7;14(9):e28894. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28894. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Diverting stomas reduce reoperation rates for anastomotic leak but not overall reoperation rates within 30 days after anterior rectal resection: a national cohort study.直肠前切除术后 30 天内,预防性造口术可降低吻合口漏的再次手术率,但不能降低总体再次手术率:一项全国性队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Jul;37(7):1681-1688. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04205-8. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
5
Trends in risk factors of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery (2011-2019): A Dutch population-based study.结直肠癌手术后吻合口漏的危险因素趋势(2011-2019):一项荷兰基于人群的研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Dec;23(12):3251-3261. doi: 10.1111/codi.15911. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
多中心随机临床试验:直肠低位前切除术后行结肠 J 袋或直线吻合结直肠重建。
Br J Surg. 2019 Aug;106(9):1147-1155. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11222. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
4
Does Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Colorectal Surgery Improve Patient Outcomes?结直肠手术中实施加速康复外科(ERAS)方案是否能改善患者预后?
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Mar;32(2):109-113. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676475. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
5
Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.基于人群的队列研究:直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏对术后死亡率的影响。
BJS Open. 2018 Oct 15;3(1):106-111. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50106. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: 2018.择期结直肠手术围手术期护理指南:术后加速康复(ERAS)学会推荐意见:2018年版
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.
7
Different Risk Factors for Early and Late Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in a Nationwide Audit.全国性审计中,早期和晚期结直肠吻合口漏的不同危险因素。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Nov;61(11):1258-1266. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001202.
8
Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.腹腔镜结直肠手术后吻合口漏的预测因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 7;24(21):2247-2260. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i21.2247.
9
Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery.限制与自由液体治疗用于大型腹部手术。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2263-2274. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801601. Epub 2018 May 9.
10
Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients.无转流造口的中低位直肠癌切除术后吻合口漏危险因素的多中心分析:对319例连续患者的回顾性研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;32(10):1431-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2875-8. Epub 2017 Aug 2.