Suppr超能文献

羟氯喹治疗新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)感染患者:一项病例对照研究。

Hydroxychloroquine in patients with novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19): a case-control study.

机构信息

Medical Research and Educational Center of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia.

Medical Research and Educational Center of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia National Medical Research Centre for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Glasgow, Great Britain.

出版信息

Kardiologiia. 2021 Mar 2;61(2):28-39. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2021.2.n1548.

Abstract

Actuality One of the most widely discussed treatments for patients with COVID-19, especially at the beginning of the epidemy, was the use of the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). The first small non-randomized trials showed the ability of HCQ and its combination with azithromycin to accelerate the elimination of the virus and ease the acute phase of the disease. Later, large, randomized trials did not confirm it (RECOVERY, SOLIDARITY). This study is a case-control study in which we compared patients who received and did not receive HCQ.Material and Methods 103 patients (25 in the HCQ treatment group and 78 in the control group) with confirmed COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 virus RNA was detected in 26 of 73 in the control group (35.6%) and in 10 of 25 (40%) in the HCQ group) and in the rest - a typical picture of viral pneumonia on multislice computed tomography [MSCT]) were included in the analysis. The severity of lung damage was limited to stages I-II, the CRP level should not exceed 60 mg/dL, and oxygen saturation in the air within 92-98%. We planned to analysis the duration of treatment of patients in the hospital, the days until the normalization of body temperature, the number of points according to the original SHOCS-COVID integral scale, and changes in its components (C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and the percentage of lung damage according to MSCT).Results Analysis for the whole group revealed a statistically significant increase in the time to normalization of body temperature from 4 to 7 days (by 3 days, p<0.001), and the duration of hospitalization from 9.4 to 11.8 days (by 2.4 days, p=0.002) when using HCQ in comparison with control. Given the incomplete balance of the groups, the main analysis included 46 patients who were matched by propensity score matching. The trend towards similar dynamics continued. HCQ treatment slowed down the time to normalization of body temperature by 1.8 days (p=0.074) and lengthened the hospitalization time by 2.1 days (p=0.042). The decrease in scores on the SHOCS -COVID scale was statistically significant in both groups, and there were no differences between them (delta - 3.00 (2.90) in the HCQ group and - 2.69 (1.55) in control, p=0.718). At the same time, in the control group, the CRP level returned to normal (4.06 mg/dl), and with the use of GC, it decreased but remained above the norm (6.21 mg/dl, p=0.05). Side effects requiring discontinuation of treatment were reported in 3 patients in the HCQ group and none in the control group.Conclusion We have not identified any positive properties of HCQ and its ability to influence the severity of COVID-19. This antimalarial agent slows down the normalization of the body's inflammatory response and lengthens the time spent in the hospital. HCQ should not be used in the treatment of COVID-19.

摘要

现状

羟氯喹(HCQ)是治疗 COVID-19 患者的最常用方法之一,尤其是在疫情初期。最初的非随机小型试验表明,HCQ 及其与阿奇霉素联合使用能够加速病毒清除并缓解疾病急性期。后来,大型随机试验并未证实这一点(RECOVERY、SOLIDARITY)。本研究为病例对照研究,我们比较了接受和未接受 HCQ 治疗的患者。

材料和方法

共纳入 103 例确诊 COVID-19 患者(HCQ 治疗组 25 例,对照组 78 例)(对照组中 73 例中有 26 例(35.6%)和 HCQ 组中有 10 例(40%)检测到 SARS-CoV-2 病毒 RNA),其余患者在多层螺旋 CT[MSCT]上均表现为典型病毒性肺炎)。肺部损伤的严重程度限于 I-II 期,C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平不应超过 60mg/dL,空气中氧饱和度应在 92-98%之间。我们计划分析患者在医院的治疗时间、体温正常化所需的天数、根据原始 SHOCS-COVID 积分量表的积分点以及其组成部分(C 反应蛋白(CRP)、D-二聚体和根据 MSCT 的肺损伤百分比)的变化。

结果

全组分析显示,与对照组相比,使用 HCQ 可使体温正常化时间从 4 天延长至 7 天(延长 3 天,p<0.001),住院时间从 9.4 天延长至 11.8 天(延长 2.4 天,p=0.002)。考虑到两组间不完全平衡,主要分析纳入了 46 例经倾向评分匹配的患者。这种趋势仍在继续。HCQ 治疗使体温正常化时间延长 1.8 天(p=0.074),住院时间延长 2.1 天(p=0.042)。两组的 SHOCS-COVID 量表评分均显著下降,且无差异(HCQ 组下降 3.00(2.90),对照组下降 2.69(1.55),p=0.718)。同时,对照组的 CRP 水平恢复正常(4.06mg/dl),而使用 GC 后虽有所下降,但仍高于正常值(6.21mg/dl,p=0.05)。HCQ 组有 3 例患者因不良反应停药,对照组无不良反应停药。

结论

我们没有发现羟氯喹有任何积极作用,也没有发现它能够影响 COVID-19 的严重程度。这种抗疟药物会减缓身体炎症反应的正常化,并延长住院时间。因此,HCQ 不应用于 COVID-19 的治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验