Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA; and.
Mapbox, Japan.
Cornea. 2021 Dec 1;40(12):1594-1599. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002714.
To assess the effect of vectored thermal pulsation treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction on objective measures of lipid layer thickness (LLT) and tear osmolarity.
One hundred patients with meibomian gland dysfunction diagnosis were recruited to participate. At their initial visit, baseline study parameters were recorded, and vectored thermal pulsation treatment was administered. At the 2- to 3-month follow-up visit, the study parameters were reevaluated. Subjective symptoms were evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire. LLT was measured using an ocular surface interferometer. Tear osmolarity was calculated using impedance measurement of tear fluid collected from the eyelid margin.
Ninety-six patients (192 eyes) completed the follow-up. Mean improvement in Ocular Surface Disease Index was 5.6 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -9.0 to -2.1, P = 0.002). There was no significant change in tear osmolarity (mean change -1.6 mOsm/L, 95% CI, -4.7 to +1.3 mOsm/L, P = 0.3). There was no significant change in LLT (mean change -4.3 nm, 95% CI, -9.1 to +0.5 nm, P = 0.08).
The hypothesis that vectored thermal pulsation treatment would decrease tear osmolarity and increase LLT was not substantiated. Although we detected significant improvement in subjective symptoms, the improvement was smaller than the improvements reported in previous studies. Our results suggest that the current understanding of the effects of vectored thermal pulsation treatment is incomplete.
评估向量热脉动治疗睑板腺功能障碍对脂质层厚度(LLT)和泪液渗透压客观测量值的影响。
招募了 100 名睑板腺功能障碍患者参与研究。在初次就诊时,记录基线研究参数并进行向量热脉动治疗。在 2-3 个月的随访就诊时,重新评估研究参数。使用眼表面疾病指数问卷评估主观症状。使用眼表面干涉仪测量 LLT。使用从眼睑边缘收集的泪液进行阻抗测量来计算泪液渗透压。
96 名患者(192 只眼)完成了随访。眼表面疾病指数的平均改善为 5.6 分(95%置信区间 [CI],-9.0 至-2.1,P = 0.002)。泪液渗透压没有显著变化(平均变化-1.6 mOsm/L,95% CI,-4.7 至+1.3 mOsm/L,P = 0.3)。LLT 没有显著变化(平均变化-4.3nm,95% CI,-9.1 至+0.5nm,P = 0.08)。
向量热脉动治疗会降低泪液渗透压并增加 LLT 的假设未得到证实。尽管我们检测到主观症状显著改善,但改善幅度小于以前研究报道的改善幅度。我们的结果表明,目前对向量热脉动治疗效果的理解还不完整。