Gies College of Business.
Department of Psychology.
Emotion. 2021 Aug;21(5):1091-1102. doi: 10.1037/emo0000948. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Across two studies, we investigated how much cognitive variables and emotional dynamics anticipated endorsement of politically partisan misbeliefs. In Study 1 ( = 298), those with lower levels of cognitive ability endorsed more political misbeliefs regardless of whether those beliefs aligned with their political preferences. However, emotional investment in political parties and outcomes predicted who endorsed misbeliefs in a partisan manner. In Study 2 ( = 251), asking participants to briefly consider political misinformation as true via social consensus led them to feel dissonance, particularly for incompatible beliefs. Allowing them then to endorse or reject those misbeliefs reduced that dissonance yet maintained feelings of self-validation, particularly as participants rejected beliefs hostile to their political vies. This effect was stronger for emotionally invested participants. These findings suggest that endorsement of divisive partisan misbeliefs is associated with affective partisanship, a feature of the political landscape that is on the rise. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
在两项研究中,我们调查了认知变量和情绪动态对支持政治党派偏见的信念的预测程度。在研究 1(n=298)中,无论这些信念是否与他们的政治偏好一致,认知能力较低的人更倾向于支持更多的政治偏见。然而,对政党和结果的情感投入预测了谁会以党派偏见的方式支持偏见。在研究 2(n=251)中,通过社会共识让参与者短暂地认为政治错误信息是真实的,这会导致他们感到不和谐,尤其是对于不兼容的信念。然后允许他们支持或拒绝这些错误信息会减少这种不和谐,但会保持自我验证的感觉,尤其是当参与者拒绝与他们的政治观点相敌对的信念时。对于情感投入较高的参与者来说,这种效果更强。这些发现表明,支持分裂性的党派偏见与情感党派偏见有关,而情感党派偏见是政治格局中日益上升的一个特征。