Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):407-418. doi: 10.1037/xge0000661. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
The rise of partisan animosity, ideological polarization, and political dogmatism has reignited important questions about the relationship between psychological rigidity and political partisanship. Two competing hypotheses have been proposed: 1 hypothesis argues that mental rigidity is related to a conservative political orientation, and the other suggests that it reflects partisan extremity across the political spectrum. In a sample of over 700 U.S. citizens, partisan extremity was related to lower levels of cognitive flexibility, regardless of political orientation, across 3 independent cognitive assessments of cognitive flexibility. This was evident across multiple statistical analyses, including quadratic regressions, Bayes factor analysis, and interrupted regressions. These findings suggest that the rigidity with which individuals process and respond to nonpolitical information may be related to the extremity of their partisan identities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
党派敌意、意识形态极化和政治教条主义的兴起重新引发了关于心理僵化与政治党派关系的重要问题。有两个相互竞争的假设:一个假设认为心理僵化与保守的政治取向有关,另一个假设则认为它反映了整个政治光谱上的党派极端主义。在一项超过 700 名美国公民的样本中,无论政治取向如何,党派极端主义与认知灵活性的较低水平有关,这是在 3 项独立的认知灵活性认知评估中得出的。这在包括二次回归、贝叶斯因子分析和中断回归在内的多种统计分析中都很明显。这些发现表明,个体处理和回应非政治信息的僵化程度可能与其党派身份的极端程度有关。