Smith Graham C, Budgey Richard
National Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248426. eCollection 2021.
Industry-led culling of badgers has occurred in England to reduce the incidence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle for a number of years. Badger vaccination is also possible, and a move away from culling was "highly desirable" in a recent report to the UK government. Here we used an established simulation model to examine badger control option in a post-cull environment in England. These options included no control, various intermittent culling, badger vaccination and use of a vaccine combined with fertility control. The initial simulated cull led to a dramatic reduction in the number of infected badgers present, which increased slowly if there was no further badger management. All three approaches led to a further reduction in the number of infected badgers, with little to choose between the strategies. We do note that of the management strategies only vaccination on its own leads to a recovery of the badger population, but also an increase in the number of badgers that need to be vaccinated. We conclude that vaccination post-cull, appears to be particularly effective, compared to vaccination when the host population is at carrying capacity.
多年来,英国一直在进行由行业主导的獾捕杀行动,以降低牛群中牛结核病的发病率。獾疫苗接种也是可行的,在最近提交给英国政府的一份报告中,放弃捕杀“非常可取”。在此,我们使用一个既定的模拟模型,来研究英国捕杀行动后的獾控制方案。这些方案包括不进行控制、各种间歇性捕杀、獾疫苗接种以及使用疫苗结合生育控制。最初模拟的捕杀导致现存感染獾的数量大幅减少,如果不再对獾进行进一步管理,这一数量会缓慢增加。所有三种方法都导致感染獾的数量进一步减少,这些策略之间几乎没有什么可选择的。我们确实注意到,在管理策略中,只有单独接种疫苗会导致獾种群数量恢复,但同时需要接种疫苗的獾的数量也会增加。我们得出结论,与在宿主种群达到承载能力时接种疫苗相比,捕杀后接种疫苗似乎特别有效。