Department of Respiratory and Exercise Physiology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Centre d'Investigation Clinique-Centre de Recherche Biologique 1404, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab099.
The aim of this pilot study was to assess physical fitness and its relationship with functional dyspnea in survivors of COVID-19 6 months after their discharge from the hospital.
Data collected routinely from people referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) following hospitalization for COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Persistent dyspnea was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale.
Twenty-three people with persistent symptoms were referred for CPET. Mean modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score was 1 (SD = 1) and was significantly associated with peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak; %) (rho = -0.49). At 6 months, those hospitalized in the general ward had a relatively preserved VO2peak (87% [SD = 20]), whereas those who had been in the intensive care unit had a moderately reduced VO2peak (77% [SD = 15]). Of note, the results of the CPET revealed that, in all individuals, respiratory equivalents were high, power-to-weight ratios were low, and those who had been in the intensive care unit had a relatively low ventilatory efficiency (mean VE/VCO2 slope = 34 [SD = 5]). Analysis of each individual showed that none had a breathing reserve <15% or 11 L/min, all had a normal exercise electrocardiogram, and 4 had a heart rate >90%.
At 6 months, persistent dyspnea was associated with reduced physical fitness. This study offers initial insights into the mid-term physical fitness of people who required hospitalization for COVID-19. It also provides novel pathophysiological clues about the underlaying mechanism of the physical limitations associated with persistent dyspnea. Those with persistent dyspnea should be offered a tailored rehabilitation intervention, which should probably include muscle reconditioning, breathing retraining, and perhaps respiratory muscle training.
This study is the first, to our knowledge, to show that a persistent breathing disorder (in addition to muscle deconditioning) can explain persistent symptoms 6 months after hospitalization for COVID-19 infection and suggests that a specific rehabilitation intervention is warranted.
本初步研究旨在评估 COVID-19 出院 6 个月后幸存者的体能状况及其与功能性呼吸困难的关系。
回顾性分析了因 COVID-19 住院后接受心肺运动测试(CPET)的患者常规收集的数据。采用改良的医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表评估持续性呼吸困难。
23 名有持续性症状的患者被转诊进行 CPET。平均改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难评分 1 分(SD=1),与峰值摄氧量(VO2peak;%)显著相关(rho=-0.49)。6 个月时,普通病房住院患者的 VO2peak 相对保留(87%[SD=20]),而重症监护病房住院患者的 VO2peak 中度降低(77%[SD=15])。值得注意的是,CPET 结果显示,所有人的呼吸当量均较高,功率与体重比较低,而重症监护病房住院患者的通气效率相对较低(平均 VE/VCO2 斜率为 34[SD=5])。对每个个体的分析表明,无一人呼吸储备<15%或 11L/min,所有人心电图正常,4 人心率>90%。
6 个月时,持续性呼吸困难与体能下降相关。本研究初步探讨了 COVID-19 住院患者的中期体能。它还为持续性呼吸困难相关的体力限制的潜在机制提供了新的病理生理学线索。持续性呼吸困难患者应接受量身定制的康复干预,可能包括肌肉再训练、呼吸训练,也许还有呼吸肌训练。
据我们所知,本研究首次表明,持续性呼吸障碍(除肌肉失健外)可解释 COVID-19 感染住院 6 个月后的持续性症状,并提示需要特定的康复干预。