Center for Nursing and Healthcare Research in Clinical Practice Application, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, Taylor's University, Malaysia; School of Pharmacy, Monash University, Malaysia.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;61:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
Needle procedures are the most common source of pain, anxiety, and fear among children. A combination of a cooling ice-pack and/or a vibrating motor for pain management in children has been evaluated in trials, but their overall effects await a synthesis of the available evidence.
Comprehensive search was conducted using Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Airiti. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RR), mean difference (MD) and 95% CI using RevMan 5.3. A meta-regression was conducted to investigate the effects of mean age on MD of pain.
A total of 1479 children from 16 publications were included. Compared with the control group, using cold-vibrating device significantly decreased pain level above the age of 2 (MD -3.03, 95% CI: -3.38, -2.68), as well as lower anxiety level among parents (MD -1.3, 95% CI: -1.9, -0.7). Meta-regression demonstrated a significant negative correlation of pain score with age. For children at 8.5 years, cold-vibration reduced the pain score by 0.13 averagely for every increment in year compared with controls (MD -0.13; 95% CI: -0.25, -0.01). No adverse events were reported in included studies.
The cold-vibrating device reduced pain levels significantly among children without adverse effects. Variation of factors might contribute to the heterogeneity of our study, such as age, different needle procedures, psychological strategies…etc.
Cool-vibration treatment reduced pain levels in children who underwent needle procedures and the treatment appears more effective in older children. The device is promising in clinical setting due to its non-invasiveness and ease of usage.
在儿童中,针具操作是疼痛、焦虑和恐惧的最常见来源。已经在试验中评估了将冰袋冷却和/或振动电机相结合用于儿童疼痛管理的效果,但它们的总体效果仍有待对现有证据进行综合评估。
我们使用 Cochrane、PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Airiti 进行了全面检索。我们使用 RevMan 5.3 计算了汇总风险比 (RR)、均数差 (MD) 和 95%置信区间。进行了 meta 回归以探究平均年龄对疼痛 MD 的影响。
共有来自 16 篇文献的 1479 名儿童纳入研究。与对照组相比,在 2 岁以上儿童中使用冷-振动装置可显著降低疼痛水平(MD-3.03,95%CI:-3.38,-2.68),也可降低父母的焦虑水平(MD-1.3,95%CI:-1.9,-0.7)。Meta 回归表明疼痛评分与年龄呈显著负相关。对于 8.5 岁的儿童,与对照组相比,冷-振动装置可使疼痛评分平均每增加 1 岁降低 0.13(MD-0.13;95%CI:-0.25,-0.01)。纳入研究中未报告不良事件。
冷-振动装置可显著降低接受针具操作的儿童的疼痛水平,且无不良作用。本研究的异质性可能归因于年龄、不同的针具操作、心理策略等因素的变化。
冷-振动治疗可降低接受针具操作的儿童的疼痛水平,且在年龄较大的儿童中效果更显著。该设备具有非侵入性和易于使用的特点,有望在临床环境中得到应用。