Kragt Marit E, Manero Ana
UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, M087 / 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6059, Australia; Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Western Australia, M087 / 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6059, Australia.
UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, M087 / 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6059, Australia; Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU College of Asia & the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 1;287:112258. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112258. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
Around the world, the development of acceptable and achievable completion criteria is a necessary part of mine closure planning and fundamental to the successful transition of mined land to a post-mining use. Without adequate completion criteria, a mining company cannot proceed to the process of relinquishment, which is the ultimate goal of most mine closure processes. Despite the central role of completion criteria, there is still a need to build capacity and understanding of how to set targets and develop measurable completion criteria that are accepted by all stakeholders involved. We investigate how completion criteria are currently developed in one of Australia's major mining jurisdictions: Western Australia. Through an industry consultation process that involved interviews and a survey with a total of 102 participants from mining companies, consulting businesses, and relevant regulators, we highlight key challenges and opportunities that the sector faces to successfully define clear, achievable, and agreed completion criteria. This is one of the few industry-wide investigations to capture and analyze the perspectives of stakeholders involved in writing and assessing mine closure completion criteria. Results show that some major challenges included inconsistent coordination within and between stakeholder groups, a lack of knowledge or data about restoration, and an overreliance on status quo practices and post-mining land uses. Our work shows that ongoing research on ecological restoration and technological innovations is necessary, but that additional organizational and regulatory barriers need to be addressed to achieve a consistent, coordinated, multi-stakeholder approach to define completion criteria and to advance successful mine rehabilitation and relinquishment.
在全球范围内,制定可接受且可实现的完工标准是矿山关闭规划的必要组成部分,也是采矿土地成功转型为采矿后用途的基础。没有足够的完工标准,矿业公司就无法进入放弃流程,而这是大多数矿山关闭流程的最终目标。尽管完工标准起着核心作用,但仍有必要增强能力,并加深对如何设定目标以及制定所有相关利益攸关方都认可的可衡量完工标准的理解。我们调查了澳大利亚主要采矿辖区之一西澳大利亚州目前是如何制定完工标准的。通过一个行业咨询过程,该过程包括对来自矿业公司、咨询企业和相关监管机构的总共102名参与者进行访谈和调查,我们突出了该行业在成功界定清晰、可实现且商定的完工标准方面面临的关键挑战和机遇。这是为数不多的全面调查之一,旨在捕捉和分析参与撰写和评估矿山关闭完工标准的利益攸关方的观点。结果表明,一些主要挑战包括利益攸关方群体内部和之间协调不一致、缺乏关于恢复的知识或数据,以及过度依赖现状做法和采矿后土地用途。我们的工作表明,对生态恢复和技术创新进行持续研究是必要的,但还需要解决额外的组织和监管障碍,以实现一种一致、协调的多利益攸关方方法来界定完工标准,并推动成功的矿山复垦和放弃。