• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟中心视力丧失会损害位置概率的内隐学习。

Simulated central vision loss impairs implicit location probability learning.

机构信息

Dartmouth College, United States; University of Minnesota, United States.

University of Minnesota, United States.

出版信息

Cortex. 2021 May;138:241-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.009
PMID:33735796
Abstract

Some eye diseases, especially macular degeneration, can cause central vision loss (CVL), impairing goal-driven guidance of attention. Does CVL also affect implicit, experience-driven attention? We investigated how simulated central scotomas affected young adults' ability to prioritize locations frequently containing visual search targets (location probability learning). Participants searched among distractor letter 'L's for a target 'T' that appeared more often in one screen quadrant than others. To dissociate potential impairments to statistical learning of target locations and attentional guidance, two experiments each included search with and without simulated scotomas. Experiment 1 successfully induced probability learning in a no-scotoma phase. When participants later searched both with and without simulated scotomas, they showed persistent, statistically equivalent spatial biases in both no-scotoma and scotoma search. Experiment 2 trained participants with a central scotoma. While Experiment 1's participants acquired probability learning regardless of their self-reported awareness of the target's location probability, in Experiment 2 only aware participants learned to bias attention to the high probability region. Similarly, learning with a scotoma affected search with no scotoma in aware but not unaware participants. Together, these results show that simulated central vision loss interferes with the acquisition of implicitly learned location probability learning, supporting a role of central vision in implicit spatial attentional biases.

摘要

一些眼部疾病,特别是黄斑变性,可以导致中央视力丧失(CVL),从而损害目标驱动的注意力引导。CVL 是否也会影响隐性、经验驱动的注意力?我们研究了模拟中央暗点如何影响年轻人优先考虑经常包含视觉搜索目标的位置的能力(位置概率学习)。参与者在干扰字母“L”中搜索目标“T”,目标“T”在一个屏幕象限中比其他象限出现的频率更高。为了区分潜在的目标位置统计学习和注意力引导障碍,两个实验都包括有和没有模拟暗点的搜索。实验 1 在无暗点阶段成功地诱发了概率学习。当参与者随后在有和没有模拟暗点的情况下进行搜索时,他们在无暗点和暗点搜索中都表现出持续的、统计学上等效的空间偏向。实验 2 对参与者进行中央暗点训练。虽然实验 1 的参与者无论是否意识到目标的位置概率,都可以获得概率学习,但在实验 2 中,只有有意识的参与者才能学会将注意力偏向高概率区域。同样,在有暗点的情况下进行学习会影响有意识但无意识的参与者在没有暗点的情况下的搜索。总之,这些结果表明,模拟中央视力丧失会干扰隐性学习的位置概率学习的获取,支持中央视力在隐性空间注意力偏向中的作用。

相似文献

1
Simulated central vision loss impairs implicit location probability learning.模拟中心视力丧失会损害位置概率的内隐学习。
Cortex. 2021 May;138:241-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Simulated central vision loss does not impair implicit location probability learning when participants search through simple displays.模拟中心视力丧失并不会在参与者通过简单的显示器进行搜索时损害内隐位置概率学习。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Aug;84(6):1901-1912. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02416-9. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
3
Contribution of peripheral vision to attentional learning.周边视觉对注意力学习的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):95-108. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02808-z. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
Peripheral vision contributes to implicit attentional learning: Findings from the "mouse-eye" paradigm.周边视觉有助于内隐注意学习:来自“鼠标眼”范式的发现。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1621-1640. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02907-5. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
5
Implicit location probability learning does not induce baseline shifts of visuospatial attention.内隐位置概率学习不会引起视空间注意的基线转移。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):552-558. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01588-8.
6
Central and peripheral vision loss differentially affects contextual cueing in visual search.中央和周边视力丧失对视觉搜索中的上下文线索提示有不同影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Sep;41(5):1485-96. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000117. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
7
Intact Contextual Cueing for Search in Realistic Scenes with Simulated Central or Peripheral Vision Loss.在具有模拟中央或周边视觉丧失的真实场景中进行搜索时的完整语境线索。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jul 10;9(8):15. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.8.15. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Implicitly-learned spatial attention is unimpaired in patients with Parkinson's disease.帕金森病患者的内隐性空间注意未受损。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Oct;119:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
9
Experience-guided attention: Uniform and implicit.经验引导的注意力:统一且隐含。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1647-1653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1585-9.
10
The effect of target salience and size in visual search within naturalistic scenes under degraded vision.在低能见度自然场景视觉搜索中目标显著性和大小的影响。
J Vis. 2021 Apr 1;21(4):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.4.2.

引用本文的文献

1
Location probability learning in visual search of targets with low prevalence.低发生率目标视觉搜索中的位置概率学习
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03100-y.
2
Clinical efficacy of a head-mounted device for central vision loss.头戴设备治疗中心视力丧失的临床疗效。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 13;14(1):21384. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72331-0.
3
Contribution of peripheral vision to attentional learning.周边视觉对注意力学习的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):95-108. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02808-z. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
A systematic review of extended reality (XR) for understanding and augmenting vision loss.一项关于扩展现实(XR)用于理解和增强视力损失的系统评价。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.5.
5
Statistical learning of target location and distractor location rely on different mechanisms during visual search.在视觉搜索中,目标位置和分心物位置的统计学习依赖于不同的机制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):342-365. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02626-9. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
6
Simulated central vision loss does not impair implicit location probability learning when participants search through simple displays.模拟中心视力丧失并不会在参与者通过简单的显示器进行搜索时损害内隐位置概率学习。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Aug;84(6):1901-1912. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02416-9. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
7
Is probabilistic cuing of visual search an inflexible attentional habit? A meta-analytic review.视觉搜索的概率 cue 是否是一种不灵活的注意习惯?一项元分析综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):521-529. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02025-5. Epub 2021 Nov 23.