Department of Dermatology, The 305 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University Affiliated with Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing, China,
Dermatology. 2021;237(4):542-552. doi: 10.1159/000514535. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a widely acquired, relapsing inflammatory skin disease. Biologics are now widely used in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
This work aims to summarize both label and off-label biologics on AD treatment in phase II and phase III stages, and compile evidence on the efficacy of the most-studied biologics.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all documented biological therapies for AD. The criteria were further refined to focus on those treatments with the highest evidence level for AD with at least one randomized clinical trial supporting their use. Only studies or articles published in English were enrolled in this study.
Primary searches identified 525 relevant articles and 27 trials. Duplicated articles and papers without a full text were excluded. Only completed trials were enrolled. We included 28 randomized controlled trials, 4 unpublished trials, 2 observational studies, and 1 meta-analysis. Eight kinds of biologics, including IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, anti-IL-13 antibodies, anti-IL-22 antibodies, anti-IL-33 antibodies, thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitor (TSLP), OX40 antibodies, and H4R-antagonists were included in this work. Dupliumab, as the most widely used and investigated biologic, was reported in 1 meta-analysis and 4 trials exploring its long-term use and application in both adults and pediatric patients. Besides dupilumab, four other IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors recruited were all randomized, clinical trials at phase 2-3 stage. Six different kinds of JAK inhibitors were summarized with strong evidence revealing their significant therapeutic effects on AD. There were 3 trials for nemolizumab, an anti-IL-13 antibody, all of which were in the phase 2 clinical trial stage. Results showed nemolizumab could be another alternative therapy for moderate-to-severe AD with long-term efficiency and safety.
The biological therapies with the most robust evidence on efficacy and long-term safety for AD treatment include dupilumab, barcitinib, abrocitinib, and delgocitinib. Most of the biologics mentioned in this review were still at the exploratory stage. This review will help practitioners advise patients seeking suitable biological therapies and offer experimental study directions for treatment.
特应性皮炎(AD)是一种广泛获得的、复发性炎症性皮肤病。生物制剂现在广泛用于中重度 AD 患者。
本研究旨在总结 AD 治疗的 II 期和 III 期标签和非标签生物制剂,并汇编最具研究价值的生物制剂疗效的证据。
我们通过 PubMed、EMBASE 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行了全面的文献检索,以确定所有有记录的 AD 生物治疗方法。标准进一步细化,重点关注那些具有最高 AD 证据水平的治疗方法,至少有一项支持其使用的随机临床试验。本研究仅纳入了以英文发表的研究或文章。
初步检索确定了 525 篇相关文章和 27 项试验。排除了重复的文章和没有全文的文章。仅纳入了已完成的试验。我们纳入了 28 项随机对照试验、4 项未发表的试验、2 项观察性研究和 1 项荟萃分析。本研究纳入了 8 种生物制剂,包括 IL-4/IL-13 抑制剂、JAK 抑制剂、抗 IL-13 抗体、抗 IL-22 抗体、抗 IL-33 抗体、胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素抑制剂(TSLP)、OX40 抗体和 H4R 拮抗剂。Dupliumab 是最广泛使用和研究的生物制剂,在 1 项荟萃分析和 4 项探索其在成人和儿科患者中的长期使用和应用的试验中均有报道。除了 dupilumab 之外,还纳入了其他 4 种 IL-4/IL-13 抑制剂,均为 2-3 期随机临床试验。总结了 6 种不同类型的 JAK 抑制剂,有强有力的证据表明它们对 AD 有显著的治疗效果。有 3 项 nemolizumab(抗 IL-13 抗体)的试验均处于 2 期临床试验阶段。结果表明,nemolizumab 可能是中重度 AD 的另一种替代治疗方法,具有长期疗效和安全性。
AD 治疗中最具疗效和长期安全性证据的生物疗法包括 dupilumab、barcitinib、abrocitinib 和 delgocitinib。本综述中提到的大多数生物制剂仍处于探索阶段。本综述将帮助临床医生为寻求合适的生物疗法的患者提供建议,并为治疗提供实验研究方向。