Alraddadi Rose, Kalantan Mulham, Aljefri Yara, Maaddawi Hadeel, Alsamadani Abdulrahman, Kadasa Athoub, Softah Abdulrahman, Tabbakh Baraa, Alturkistani Rahaf, Jfri Abdulhadi
College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 2;12:1550640. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1550640. eCollection 2025.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting 5%-20% of children and 2%-10% of adults worldwide. Treatment for moderate-to-severe AD includes biologics like dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, and JAK inhibitors (abrocitinib, upadacitinib). However, upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are commonly reported adverse events for these therapies. This meta-analysis aims to estimate the pooled incidence of URTIs associated with these treatments compared to topicals.
A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, DOAJ, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving AD patients treated with dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, abrocitinib, or upadacitinib, excluding studies of patients treated with topicals, Studies on other dermatitis types and biologics. Data on URTI events, sample sizes, and incidence were extracted. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using the Netmeta package in R, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
From 413 retrieved records, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. URTI incidence of the treatment group in the included studies ranged from 0.35% to 41.5%, while control groups showed rates between 0% and 40%. Across all studies, URTI incidence was 9.70% in intervention groups and 8.03% in placebo groups (MH OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.98-1.42). Heterogeneity was low ( = 20.14%), with no evidence of publication bias ( = 0.83). There were no significant subgroup differences between patients taking different biological therapies ( = 3.90, = 0.42).
While URTIs are common adverse events for AD therapies, their incidence in intervention groups is similar to control, suggesting no significant increase in risk. These findings provide critical insights for clinicians in balancing efficacy and safety when selecting therapies for AD patients. Further research should explore patient-specific risk factors for URTIs.
Prospero registration code: [392093]. PROSPERO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: CRD42023392093.
特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,全球5%-20%的儿童及2%-10%的成年人受其影响。中重度AD的治疗方法包括使用度普利尤单抗、曲罗芦单抗、瑞比克izumab等生物制剂以及JAK抑制剂(阿布昔替尼、乌帕替尼)。然而,上呼吸道感染(URTIs)是这些疗法常见的不良事件。本荟萃分析旨在估计与这些治疗相关的URTIs合并发生率,并与局部用药进行比较。
在PubMed、MEDLINE、DOAJ和ClinicalTrials.gov上进行系统检索,以查找涉及接受度普利尤单抗、曲罗芦单抗、瑞比克izumab、阿布昔替尼或乌帕替尼治疗的AD患者的随机对照试验(RCTs),排除局部用药治疗患者的研究、其他皮炎类型和生物制剂的研究。提取有关URTI事件、样本量和发生率的数据。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)评估研究质量。使用R语言中的Netmeta包进行随机效应荟萃分析,计算比值比(ORs)及95%置信区间(CIs)。
从检索到的413条记录中,21项研究符合纳入标准。纳入研究中治疗组的URTI发生率在0.35%至41.5%之间,而对照组的发生率在0%至40%之间。在所有研究中,干预组的URTI发生率为9.70%,安慰剂组为8.03%(Mantel-Haenszel OR = 1.18,95% CI:0.98-1.42)。异质性较低(I² = 20.14%),无发表偏倚证据(Egger检验P = 0.83)。接受不同生物疗法的患者之间无显著亚组差异(I² = 3.90,P = 0.42)。
虽然URTIs是AD治疗常见的不良事件,但其在干预组中的发生率与对照组相似,表明风险无显著增加。这些发现为临床医生在为AD患者选择治疗方法时平衡疗效和安全性提供了关键见解。进一步研究应探索URTIs的患者特异性危险因素。
Prospero注册号:[392093]。PROSPERO,循证医学图书馆:CRD42023392093。