Aquatic Research Facility, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, UK; SureScreen Scientifics Ltd, Morley Retreat, Church Lane, Morley DE7 6DE, UK.
Aquatic Research Facility, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 10;768:144466. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144466. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
In recent years, eDNA-based assessments have evolved as valuable tools for research and conservation. Most eDNA-based applications rely on comparisons across time or space. However, temporal, and spatial dynamics of eDNA concentrations are shaped by various drivers that can affect the reliability of such comparative approaches. Here, we assessed (i) seasonal variability, (ii) degradation rates and (iii) micro-habitat heterogeneity of eDNA concentrations as key factors likely to inflict uncertainty in across site and time comparisons. In a controlled mesocosm experiment, using the white-clawed crayfish as a model organism, we found detection probabilities of technical replicates to vary substantially and range from as little as 20 to upwards of 80% between seasons. Further, degradation rates of crayfish eDNA were low and target eDNA was still detectable 14-21 days after the removal of crayfish. Finally, we recorded substantial small-scale in-situ heterogeneity and large variability among sampling sites in a single pond of merely 1000m in size. Consequently, all three tested drivers of spatial and temporal variation have the potential to severely impact the reliability of eDNA-based site comparisons and need to be accounted for in sampling design and data analysis of field-based applications.
近年来,基于 eDNA 的评估已发展成为研究和保护的有价值的工具。大多数基于 eDNA 的应用依赖于时间或空间上的比较。然而,eDNA 浓度的时间和空间动态受到各种驱动因素的影响,这些因素可能会影响此类比较方法的可靠性。在这里,我们评估了(i)季节性变化、(ii)降解率和(iii)eDNA 浓度的微生境异质性作为可能对跨地点和时间比较造成不确定性的关键因素。在一个受控的中观实验中,我们使用白爪螯虾作为模型生物,发现技术重复检测的概率变化很大,在不同季节之间的范围从 20%到 80%不等。此外,螯虾 eDNA 的降解率较低,在螯虾移除后 14-21 天仍可检测到目标 eDNA。最后,我们在一个仅有 1000 平方米大小的池塘中记录到了显著的小规模原位异质性和采样点之间的巨大变异性。因此,空间和时间变化的所有三个测试驱动因素都有可能严重影响基于 eDNA 的地点比较的可靠性,并且需要在基于现场应用的采样设计和数据分析中考虑到这些因素。