Institute for Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Mar 18;16(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01641-z.
Patient involvement in research increases the impact of research and the likelihood of adoption in clinical practice. A first step is to know which research themes are important for patients. We distributed a survey on research priorities to ERN-RND members, both patient representatives and healthcare professionals, asking them to prioritize five research themes for rare neurological diseases on a scale ranging from 1 (most important) to 5 (least important). A follow-up e-mail interview was conducted with patient representatives and professionals to assess potential reasons for differences in opinions between these two groups.
In total, 156 responses were analysed: 61 from professionals and 95 from patient representatives. They covered all ERN-RND disease groups and came from 20 different EU countries. Almost half of the respondents considered 'Developing therapies and preventive strategies' the most important research theme. In particular, patient representatives prioritized this theme more often than professionals, while professionals prioritized 'Disease mechanisms and models'. Patient representatives indicated that therapies and prevention were of the utmost importance to them, because their lives are often heavily impacted by the disease and their main goal is to relief the burden of disease. Professionals indicated that investigating disease mechanisms will lead to more knowledge and is indispensable for finding new treatments.
Patients and professionals have different opinions on which research theme should have priority. A qualitative follow-up shows that they respect each others' view points. Different stakeholders involved in research should be aware of their differences in research theme priority. Explaining these differences to each other leads to more understanding, and could improve patient engagement in research.
患者参与研究可以提高研究的影响力,并增加其在临床实践中的应用可能性。首先要知道的是,哪些研究主题对患者来说是重要的。我们向 ERN-RND 成员(包括患者代表和医疗保健专业人员)分发了一份关于研究重点的调查,要求他们在 1(最重要)到 5(最不重要)的范围内为罕见神经疾病的五个研究主题进行优先级排序。对患者代表和专业人员进行了后续电子邮件访谈,以评估这两个群体之间意见差异的潜在原因。
共分析了 156 份回复:61 份来自专业人员,95 份来自患者代表。他们涵盖了 ERN-RND 的所有疾病组,来自 20 个不同的欧盟国家。近一半的受访者认为“开发治疗方法和预防策略”是最重要的研究主题。特别是,患者代表比专业人员更常将这一主题列为优先级,而专业人员则更注重“疾病机制和模型”。患者代表表示,治疗方法和预防措施对他们来说至关重要,因为他们的生活经常受到疾病的严重影响,他们的主要目标是减轻疾病负担。专业人员则表示,研究疾病机制将带来更多的知识,对于寻找新的治疗方法是不可或缺的。
患者和专业人员对应该优先考虑哪些研究主题存在不同意见。后续的定性研究表明,他们尊重彼此的观点。参与研究的不同利益相关者应该意识到他们在研究主题优先级方面的差异。相互解释这些差异可以增进彼此的理解,并有助于提高患者对研究的参与度。