Lamb Danielle, Steare Thomas, Marston Louise, Canaway Alastair, Johnson Sonia, Kirkbride James B, Lloyd-Evans Brynmor, Morant Nicola, Pinfold Vanessa, Smith Deb, Weich Scott, Osborn David P
NIHR ARC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, UK.
Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
BJPsych Open. 2021 Mar 19;7(2):e68. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.30.
For people in mental health crisis, acute day units (ADUs) provide daily structured sessions and peer support in non-residential settings, often as an addition or alternative to crisis resolution teams (CRTs). There is little recent evidence about outcomes for those using ADUs, particularly compared with those receiving CRT care alone.
We aimed to investigate readmission rates, satisfaction and well-being outcomes for people using ADUs and CRTs.
We conducted a cohort study comparing readmission to acute mental healthcare during a 6-month period for ADU and CRT participants. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire), well-being (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) and depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale).
We recruited 744 participants (ADU: n = 431, 58%; CRT: n = 312, 42%) across four National Health Service trusts/health regions. There was no statistically significant overall difference in readmissions: 21% of ADU participants and 23% of CRT participants were readmitted over 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-1.14). However, readmission results varied substantially by setting. At follow-up, ADU participants had significantly higher Client Satisfaction Questionnaire scores (2.5, 95% CI 1.4-3.5, P < 0.001) and well-being scores (1.3, 95% CI 0.4-2.1, P = 0.004), and lower depression scores (-1.7, 95% CI -2.7 to -0.8, P < 0.001), than CRT participants.
Patients who accessed ADUs demonstrated better outcomes for satisfaction, well-being and depression, and no significant differences in risk of readmission, compared with those who only used CRTs. Given the positive outcomes for patients, and the fact that ADUs are inconsistently provided in the National Health Service, their value and place in the acute care pathway needs further consideration and research.
对于处于心理健康危机中的人来说,急性日间病房(ADU)在非住院环境中提供每日结构化治疗和同伴支持,通常作为危机解决团队(CRT)的补充或替代方案。最近几乎没有关于使用ADU的人的治疗结果的证据,特别是与仅接受CRT护理的人相比。
我们旨在调查使用ADU和CRT的人的再入院率、满意度和幸福感结果。
我们进行了一项队列研究,比较了ADU和CRT参与者在6个月内再次入住急性精神科医疗服务的情况。次要结果包括满意度(客户满意度问卷)、幸福感(简短的沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表)和抑郁(流行病学研究中心抑郁量表)。
我们在四个国民保健服务信托/健康区域招募了744名参与者(ADU:n = 431,58%;CRT:n = 312,42%)。再入院率没有统计学上的总体显著差异:21%的ADU参与者和23%的CRT参与者在6个月内再次入院(调整后的风险比为0.78,95%置信区间为0.54 - 1.14)。然而,再入院结果因环境而异。在随访时,ADU参与者的客户满意度问卷得分(2.5,95%置信区间为1.4 - 3.5,P < 0.001)和幸福感得分(1.3,95%置信区间为0.4 - 2.1,P = 0.004)显著更高,抑郁得分(-1.7,95%置信区间为 - 2.7至 - 0.8,P < 0.001)低于CRT参与者。
与仅使用CRT的患者相比,使用ADU的患者在满意度、幸福感和抑郁方面表现出更好的结果,再入院风险没有显著差异。鉴于对患者的积极结果,以及国民保健服务中ADU的提供不一致这一事实,它们在急性护理途径中的价值和地位需要进一步考虑和研究。