• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有助于为糖尿病治疗提供信息共享决策和目标设定的患者重要结局。

Patient-important outcomes to inform shared decision making and goal setting for diabetes treatment.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2592-2597. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.005
PMID:33736909
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite well-established treatment guidelines, diabetes is difficult to manage for many individuals. The importance of using shared decision making to optimize diabetes treatment is recognized, yet what matters most to individuals with diabetes is not well established. Our goal was to identify patients' goals and priorities for diabetes management.

METHODS

We engaged 141 participants through interviews and group concept mapping to identify patient-important outcomes (PIOs) for diabetes care. We generated a master list of PIOs by aggregating interview data coded to "goals" and ideas brainstormed during concept mapping, and then a patient advisory board sorted the PIOs into higher-level domains.

RESULTS

We identified 41 PIOs sorted into 7 broad domains: optimize daily self-care, optimize long term health, learn about diabetes, achieve measurable goals, manage medications, manage diet and best utilize medical / professional services.

CONCLUSIONS

Most (4/7) of PIO domains focused on personal and life goals, not medically-oriented goals. Use of these PIOs and domains may facilitate more effective SDM discussions for patients with diabetes.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Use of PIOs from this work can enable the empowerment of patients to voice their priorities during SDM conversations, thus facilitating development of truly individualized diabetes treatment plans.

摘要

目的

尽管有成熟的治疗指南,但许多人还是难以控制糖尿病。人们已经认识到采用共享决策来优化糖尿病治疗的重要性,但对于糖尿病患者来说,最重要的是什么还没有得到很好的确定。我们的目标是确定患者对糖尿病管理的目标和优先事项。

方法

我们通过访谈和小组概念映射,让 141 名参与者参与其中,以确定糖尿病护理的患者重要结局(PIO)。我们通过汇总编码为“目标”的访谈数据和概念映射期间头脑风暴的想法,生成了 PIO 的总清单,然后由患者顾问委员会将 PIO 归入更高层次的领域。

结果

我们确定了 41 个 PIO,分为 7 个广泛的领域:优化日常自我护理、优化长期健康、了解糖尿病、实现可衡量的目标、管理药物、管理饮食和充分利用医疗/专业服务。

结论

大多数(7 个领域中的 4 个)PIO 领域侧重于个人和生活目标,而不是以医疗为导向的目标。这些 PIO 和领域的使用可以为糖尿病患者的 SDM 讨论提供更有效的支持,从而促进真正个体化的糖尿病治疗计划的制定。

实践意义

使用这项工作中的 PIO 可以使患者能够在 SDM 对话中表达自己的优先事项,从而促进真正个体化的糖尿病治疗计划的制定。

相似文献

1
Patient-important outcomes to inform shared decision making and goal setting for diabetes treatment.有助于为糖尿病治疗提供信息共享决策和目标设定的患者重要结局。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2592-2597. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
The power of the group: comparison of interviews and group concept mapping for identifying patient-important outcomes of care.群体的力量:比较访谈和群体概念映射以确定护理的患者重要结局。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0656-x.
3
Goal setting and goal attainment in patients with major depressive disorder: a narrative review on shared decision making in clinical practice.主要抑郁障碍患者的目标设定和目标实现:临床实践中共享决策的叙述性综述。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Mar;40(3):483-491. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2313108. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
4
Designing and evaluating an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes in clinical care--systematic decision aid development and study protocol.设计和评估一种用于临床护理中糖尿病患者的跨专业共享决策和目标设定决策辅助工具——系统决策辅助工具的开发和研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 22;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-16.
5
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.超越利弊 - 开发患者决策辅助工具以培养对话建立关系:来自定性研究和决策辅助工具开发的见解。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0898-5.
6
Using Mind Mapping in Family Meetings to Support Shared Decision Making with Pediatric and Geriatric Patients.运用思维导图在家庭会议中支持儿科和老年患者的共同决策。
Patient. 2020 Dec;13(6):709-717. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00447-2.
7
[Shared decision making in patients with diabetes mellitus].[糖尿病患者的共同决策]
Rev Med Chil. 2017 May;145(5):641-649. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872017000500012.
8
Moving Beyond the Rhetoric of Shared Decision-Making: Designing Personal Health Record Technology With Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.超越共享决策的言辞:为 1 型糖尿病的年轻患者设计个人健康记录技术。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Jul;44(5):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
9
Being in a space of sharing decision-making for dignified mental care.处于共享决策的空间,以实现有尊严的精神关怀。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):368-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12548. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
Importance of quality-of-life priorities and preferences surrounding treatment decision making in patients with cancer and oncology clinicians.癌症患者及其肿瘤临床医生在治疗决策中对生活质量优先事项和偏好的重视。
Cancer. 2020 Aug 1;126(15):3534-3541. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32961. Epub 2020 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-important outcomes in type 2 diabetes: The paradigm of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.2 型糖尿病的患者重要结局:钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的范例。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2024 Jul-Aug;21(4):14791641241269743. doi: 10.1177/14791641241269743.
2
Patient-centered care in diabetes care-concepts, relationships and practice.糖尿病护理中的以患者为中心的护理——概念、关系与实践
World J Diabetes. 2024 Jul 15;15(7):1417-1429. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i7.1417.
3
Journey Through Healthcare of People With Complications of Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study of Lived Experiences.
2型糖尿病并发症患者的医疗保健历程:一项关于生活经历的定性研究。
Int J Integr Care. 2024 May 21;24(2):18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7604. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
4
Expanding the Catalog of Patient and Caregiver Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Systematic Literature Review.扩大患者和照护者自付费用目录:系统文献回顾。
Popul Health Manag. 2024 Feb;27(1):70-83. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0238. Epub 2023 Dec 13.