Suppr超能文献

电子临床决策支持工具用于评估初级保健中的胃部症状(ECASS):一项可行性研究。

Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study.

机构信息

Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 18;11(3):e041795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041795.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial in primary care of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for possible oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Feasibility study in 42 general practices in two regions of England, cluster randomised controlled trial design without blinding, nested qualitative and health economic evaluation.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 55 years or older, presenting to their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms associated with O-G cancer. 530 patients (mean age 68 years, 58% female) participated.

INTERVENTION

Practices randomised 1:1 to usual care (control) or to receive a previously piloted eCDS tool for suspected cancer (intervention), for use at the discretion of the GPs, supported by a theory-based implementation package and ongoing support. We conducted semistructured interviews with GPs in intervention practices. Recruitment lasted 22 months.

OUTCOMES

Patient participation rate, use of eCDS, referrals and route to diagnosis, O-G cancer diagnoses; acceptability to GPs; cost-effectiveness. Participants followed up 6 months after index encounter.

RESULTS

From control and intervention practices, we screened 3841 and 1303 patients, respectively; 1189 and 434 were eligible, 392 and 138 consented to participate. Ten patients (1.9%) had O-G cancer. eCDS was used eight times in total by five unique users. GPs experienced interoperability problems between the eCDS tool and their clinical system and also found it did not fit with their workflow. Unexpected restrictions on software installation caused major problems with implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The conduct of this study was hampered by technical limitations not evident during an earlier pilot of the eCDS tool, and by regulatory controls on software installation introduced by primary care trusts early in the study. This eCDS tool needed to integrate better with clinical workflow; even then, its use for suspected cancer may be infrequent. Any definitive trial of eCDS for cancer diagnosis should only proceed after addressing these constraints.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN125595588.

摘要

目的

确定在初级保健中进行电子临床决策支持(eCDS)治疗疑似食管-胃(O-G)癌症的可行性。

设计和设置

在英格兰两个地区的 42 家普通诊所进行的可行性研究,采用非盲、嵌套的定性和健康经济学评价的集群随机对照试验设计。

参与者

年龄在 55 岁或以上,因 O-G 癌症相关症状就诊于全科医生(GP)的患者。共有 530 名患者(平均年龄 68 岁,58%为女性)参与。

干预措施

诊所 1:1 随机分为常规护理(对照组)或接受先前试点的疑似癌症电子临床决策支持工具(干预组),由 GP 酌情使用,辅以基于理论的实施包和持续支持。我们对干预组的 GP 进行了半结构化访谈。招募持续了 22 个月。

结果

从对照组和干预组的诊所中,我们分别筛选了 3841 名和 1303 名患者;分别有 1189 名和 434 名患者符合条件,392 名和 138 名患者同意参与。10 名患者(1.9%)患有 O-G 癌症。总共 5 名不同的用户使用了该电子临床决策支持工具 8 次。GP 体验到电子临床决策支持工具与他们的临床系统之间的互操作性问题,也发现它与他们的工作流程不匹配。软件安装的意外限制导致了实施中的主要问题。

结论

这项研究的进行受到了技术限制的阻碍,这些限制在电子临床决策支持工具的早期试点中并不明显,此外,初级保健信托在研究早期对软件安装的监管控制也造成了阻碍。这种电子临床决策支持工具需要更好地与临床工作流程集成;即便如此,它用于疑似癌症的使用可能也不频繁。任何用于癌症诊断的电子临床决策支持工具的确定性试验都应该在解决这些限制后才能进行。

试验注册号

ISRCTN81654224。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8000/7978254/6495a835bcf9/bmjopen-2020-041795f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验