Suppr超能文献

为了阐明与激励:在线信息传播的模糊痕迹模型。

To illuminate and motivate: A fuzzy-trace model of the spread of information online.

作者信息

Broniatowski David A, Reyna Valerie F

机构信息

The George Washington University.

Cornell University.

出版信息

Comput Math Organ Theory. 2020 Dec;26:431-464. doi: 10.1007/s10588-019-09297-2. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

Abstract

We propose, and test, a model of online media platform users' decisions to act on, and share, received information. Specifically, we focus on how of message content drive its spread. Our model is based on Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT), a leading theory of decision under risk. Per FTT, online content is mentally represented in two ways: verbatim (objective, but decontextualized, facts), and gist (subjective, but meaningful, interpretation). Although encoded in parallel, gist tends to drive behaviors more strongly than verbatim representations for most individuals. Our model uses factors derived from FTT to make predictions regarding which content is more likely to be shared, namely: a) different levels of mental representation, b) the motivational content of a message, c) difficulty of information processing (e.g., the ease with which a given message may be comprehended and, therefore, its gist extracted), and d) social values.

摘要

我们提出并测试了一个关于在线媒体平台用户对所接收信息采取行动并分享的决策模型。具体而言,我们关注消息内容的哪些方面推动其传播。我们的模型基于模糊痕迹理论(FTT),这是一种风险决策的主导理论。根据FTT,在线内容在心理上以两种方式呈现:逐字记录(客观但脱离上下文的事实)和要点(主观但有意义的解释)。虽然两者是并行编码的,但对于大多数人来说,要点往往比逐字记录更能强烈地驱动行为。我们的模型使用从FTT得出的因素来预测哪些内容更有可能被分享,即:a)不同层次的心理表征,b)消息的动机内容,c)信息处理的难度(例如,给定消息被理解并因此提取其要点的难易程度),以及d)社会价值观。

相似文献

2
The role of mental representation in sharing misinformation online.心理表征在网络虚假信息传播中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2024 Dec;30(4):511-538. doi: 10.1037/xap0000517. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
8
Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.病毒、疫苗与新冠疫情:解释并改善风险决策
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;10(4):491-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

4
Barriers to Online Dementia Information and Mitigation.在线痴呆症信息的障碍与缓解措施
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2022 Apr;2022. doi: 10.1145/3491102.3517554. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
7
Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.病毒、疫苗与新冠疫情:解释并改善风险决策
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;10(4):491-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
8
News Feature: Finding a vaccine for misinformation.新闻特写:寻找对抗错误信息的“疫苗”
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):18902-18905. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013249117. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Malicious Actors on Twitter: A Guide for Public Health Researchers.推特上的恶意行为者:公共卫生研究人员指南。
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):688-692. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304969. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.先前的接触会增加对假新闻的感知准确性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1865-1880. doi: 10.1037/xge0000465. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
9
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action.增加疫苗接种:将心理科学付诸行动。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Dec;18(3):149-207. doi: 10.1177/1529100618760521.
10
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验