• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为了阐明与激励:在线信息传播的模糊痕迹模型。

To illuminate and motivate: A fuzzy-trace model of the spread of information online.

作者信息

Broniatowski David A, Reyna Valerie F

机构信息

The George Washington University.

Cornell University.

出版信息

Comput Math Organ Theory. 2020 Dec;26:431-464. doi: 10.1007/s10588-019-09297-2. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10588-019-09297-2
PMID:33737859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7962747/
Abstract

We propose, and test, a model of online media platform users' decisions to act on, and share, received information. Specifically, we focus on how of message content drive its spread. Our model is based on Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT), a leading theory of decision under risk. Per FTT, online content is mentally represented in two ways: verbatim (objective, but decontextualized, facts), and gist (subjective, but meaningful, interpretation). Although encoded in parallel, gist tends to drive behaviors more strongly than verbatim representations for most individuals. Our model uses factors derived from FTT to make predictions regarding which content is more likely to be shared, namely: a) different levels of mental representation, b) the motivational content of a message, c) difficulty of information processing (e.g., the ease with which a given message may be comprehended and, therefore, its gist extracted), and d) social values.

摘要

我们提出并测试了一个关于在线媒体平台用户对所接收信息采取行动并分享的决策模型。具体而言,我们关注消息内容的哪些方面推动其传播。我们的模型基于模糊痕迹理论(FTT),这是一种风险决策的主导理论。根据FTT,在线内容在心理上以两种方式呈现:逐字记录(客观但脱离上下文的事实)和要点(主观但有意义的解释)。虽然两者是并行编码的,但对于大多数人来说,要点往往比逐字记录更能强烈地驱动行为。我们的模型使用从FTT得出的因素来预测哪些内容更有可能被分享,即:a)不同层次的心理表征,b)消息的动机内容,c)信息处理的难度(例如,给定消息被理解并因此提取其要点的难易程度),以及d)社会价值观。

相似文献

1
To illuminate and motivate: A fuzzy-trace model of the spread of information online.为了阐明与激励:在线信息传播的模糊痕迹模型。
Comput Math Organ Theory. 2020 Dec;26:431-464. doi: 10.1007/s10588-019-09297-2. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
The role of mental representation in sharing misinformation online.心理表征在网络虚假信息传播中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2024 Dec;30(4):511-538. doi: 10.1037/xap0000517. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
A scientific theory of gist communication and misinformation resistance, with implications for health, education, and policy.一种关于主旨沟通和抵制错误信息的科学理论,对健康、教育和政策具有启示意义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912441117. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.模糊痕迹理论:记忆、推理和认知神经科学中的双重加工
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:41-100. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80062-3.
5
Decision-making and risk in bipolar disorder: A quantitative study using fuzzy trace theory.双相情感障碍中的决策与风险:使用模糊痕迹理论的定量研究。
Psychol Psychother. 2020 Mar;93(1):105-121. doi: 10.1111/papt.12215. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
6
Interactions and implications of Fuzzy-Trace theory for risk taking behaviors in bipolar disorder.双相障碍风险行为的模糊痕迹理论的相互作用和影响。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.035. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
7
Development of Risky Decision Making: Fuzzy-Trace Theory and Neurobiological Perspectives.风险决策的发展:模糊痕迹理论与神经生物学视角
Child Dev Perspect. 2015 Jun;9(2):122-127. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12117.
8
Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.病毒、疫苗与新冠疫情:解释并改善风险决策
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;10(4):491-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
9
Individual differences in numerical representations of risk in health decision making: A fuzzy-trace theory approach.健康决策中风险数值表征的个体差异:一种模糊痕迹理论方法。
Risk Anal. 2023 Mar;43(3):548-557. doi: 10.1111/risa.13914. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
10
Adolescents' and Young Adults' Online Risk Taking: The Role of Gist and Verbatim Representations.青少年和青年的在线冒险行为:主旨与逐字表征的作用。
Risk Anal. 2015 Aug;35(8):1407-22. doi: 10.1111/risa.12369. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting User Engagement in Health Misinformation Correction on Social Media Platforms in Taiwan: Content Analysis and Text Mining Study.预测台湾社交媒体平台上健康错误信息纠正中的用户参与度:内容分析与文本挖掘研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 23;27:e65631. doi: 10.2196/65631.
2
The efficacy of Facebook's vaccine misinformation policies and architecture during the COVID-19 pandemic.Facebook 在 COVID-19 大流行期间疫苗错误信息政策和架构的效果。
Sci Adv. 2023 Sep 15;9(37):eadh2132. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh2132.
3
Collective Value Promotes the Willingness to Share Provaccination Messages on Social Media in China: Randomized Controlled Trial.集体价值观促进中国社交媒体上分享疫苗接种信息的意愿:随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 4;6(10):e35744. doi: 10.2196/35744.
4
Barriers to Online Dementia Information and Mitigation.在线痴呆症信息的障碍与缓解措施
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2022 Apr;2022. doi: 10.1145/3491102.3517554. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
COVID-19 conspiracy ideation is associated with the delusion proneness trait and resistance to update of beliefs.新冠病毒阴谋论观念与妄想倾向特质和抗拒信仰更新有关。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 20;12(1):10352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14071-7.
6
Understanding the landscape of web-based medical misinformation about vaccination.理解网络上关于疫苗接种的医学错误信息的全貌。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):348-363. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01840-5. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.病毒、疫苗与新冠疫情:解释并改善风险决策
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2021 Dec;10(4):491-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
8
News Feature: Finding a vaccine for misinformation.新闻特写:寻找对抗错误信息的“疫苗”
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):18902-18905. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013249117. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Malicious Actors on Twitter: A Guide for Public Health Researchers.推特上的恶意行为者:公共卫生研究人员指南。
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):688-692. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304969. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.2016年美国总统大选期间推特上的假新闻。
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):374-378. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2706.
3
Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media.应对社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2417-2418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16865.
4
A formal model of fuzzy-trace theory: Variations on framing effects and the Allais paradox.模糊痕迹理论的形式模型:框架效应和阿莱悖论的变体
Decision (Wash D C ). 2018 Oct;5(4):205-252. doi: 10.1037/dec0000083. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.先前的接触会增加对假新闻的感知准确性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1865-1880. doi: 10.1037/xge0000465. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.武器化的健康传播:推特机器人和俄罗斯水军放大疫苗辩论。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Oct;108(10):1378-1384. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
7
Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.懒惰而非偏见:党派虚假新闻的易感性可以更好地用缺乏推理来解释,而不是用动机推理来解释。
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
8
Vaccine Images on Twitter: Analysis of What Images are Shared.推特上的疫苗图片:对所分享图片的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 3;20(4):e130. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8221.
9
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action.增加疫苗接种:将心理科学付诸行动。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2017 Dec;18(3):149-207. doi: 10.1177/1529100618760521.
10
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.