• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷与陶瓷对高交联聚乙烯的比较:一项荟萃分析的结果

Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Highly-Crosslinked-Polyethylene in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Findings of a Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Almaawi Abdulaziz, Alzuhair Abduljabbar, AlHakbani Abdulaziz, Benfaris Demah, Al-Abdullatif Fahad, Alabdulkarim Nouf H, Awwad Waleed

机构信息

Orthopedic Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

Orthopaedic Surgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Feb 12;13(2):e13304. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13304.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.13304
PMID:33738155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7958929/
Abstract

Introduction An optimal hip implant is biocompatible, durable, and resistant to chemical and mechanical wear. This analysis aimed to compare failure (revision) and complication rates between ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and ceramic-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene (CoHXLPE) implants. Methods This review comprised of scientific literature published between 1995 and 2019. We included randomized controlled trials in adults (>18 years) that presented results of CoC and CoHXLPE total hip arthroplasty (THA) with more than two years of mean follow-up and drafted in English. The primary outcomes for this analysis were complications, revision rates, and loosening rates. Results Eight studies (1,689 hips) were included in this systematic review. There was no significant differences between COC and CoHXLPE for the risk of post-surgical complications (relative risk [RR]: 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-4.69, P = 0.12). Revision rates (RR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.71-2.20, P = 0.43] and loosening rates between the two implants were not significantly different (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.30-4.52, P = 0.82). Conclusion We report no significant differences between CoHXLPE and CoC in adults undergoing primary THA. Although introduced relatively recently, CoHXLPE is a cost-effective bearing that can be used for younger patients with no risk of increased complications in comparison to CoC. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are recommended to confirm the findings of this meta-analysis.

摘要

引言 理想的髋关节植入物应具有生物相容性、耐用性,并且能抵抗化学和机械磨损。本分析旨在比较陶瓷对陶瓷(CoC)和陶瓷对高交联聚乙烯(CoHXLPE)植入物的失败(翻修)率和并发症发生率。

方法 本综述纳入了1995年至2019年发表的科学文献。我们纳入了针对成年人(>18岁)的随机对照试验,这些试验呈现了平均随访超过两年的CoC和CoHXLPE全髋关节置换术(THA)的结果,且文献为英文撰写。本分析的主要结局为并发症、翻修率和松动率。

结果 本系统评价纳入了八项研究(共1689例髋关节)。CoC和CoHXLPE在术后并发症风险方面无显著差异(相对风险[RR]:1.98,95%置信区间[CI]:0.83 - 4.69,P = 0.12)。两种植入物之间的翻修率(RR:1.25,95% CI:0.71 - 2.20,P = 0.43)和松动率也无显著差异(RR:1.17,95% CI:0.30 - 4.52,P = 0.82)。

结论 我们报告在接受初次THA的成年人中,CoHXLPE和CoC之间无显著差异。尽管CoHXLPE相对较新,但它是一种性价比高的承重材料,与CoC相比,可用于年轻患者,且并发症增加风险较低。建议进行更长随访期的进一步研究以证实该荟萃分析的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/751fb42689cd/cureus-0013-00000013304-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/aa27aad30cca/cureus-0013-00000013304-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/78f669447782/cureus-0013-00000013304-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/6ec475832dde/cureus-0013-00000013304-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/751fb42689cd/cureus-0013-00000013304-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/aa27aad30cca/cureus-0013-00000013304-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/78f669447782/cureus-0013-00000013304-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/6ec475832dde/cureus-0013-00000013304-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e10/7958929/751fb42689cd/cureus-0013-00000013304-i04.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Highly-Crosslinked-Polyethylene in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Findings of a Meta-Analysis.初次全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷与陶瓷对高交联聚乙烯的比较:一项荟萃分析的结果
Cureus. 2021 Feb 12;13(2):e13304. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13304.
2
Is a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing really superior to ceramic-on-polyethylene for primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.对于初次全髋关节置换术,陶瓷对陶瓷轴承真的比陶瓷对聚乙烯轴承更具优势吗?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hip Int. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):191-8. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000223. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
3
Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic vs. Ceramic-on-Polyethylene for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Trials.陶瓷对陶瓷与陶瓷对聚乙烯用于初次全髋关节置换术的比较:15项随机试验的荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2021 Dec 16;8:751121. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.751121. eCollection 2021.
4
The effect of bearing type on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty.轴承类型对全髋关节置换术结果的影响。
Acta Orthop. 2018 Apr;89(2):163-169. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1405669. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5
Significantly Lower Wear of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings Than Metal-on-Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-Up Study.陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的磨损显著低于金属对高交联聚乙烯轴承:一项10至14年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1246-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
6
Ten-year survival of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.60岁以下患者陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术的10年生存率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Nov 18;16(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02828-1.
7
Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷关节翻修的原因与其他假体有差异吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4917-x.
8
Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同关节面的全髋关节置换术在生存率上是否存在差异?一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):21871-85. eCollection 2015.
9
Same survival but higher rate of osteolysis for metal-on-metal Ultamet versus ceramic-on-ceramic in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty after 8 years of follow-up.8 年随访后,初次全髋关节置换术的患者中,金属对金属 Ultamet 比陶瓷对陶瓷的存活率相同,但骨溶解率更高。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1155-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Ceramic-on-Ceramic in Total Hip Replacement Revision.全髋关节置换翻修术中的陶瓷对陶瓷
Z Orthop Unfall. 2018 Jun;156(3):272-280. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124767. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of bearing surface materials with the risk of revision following primary total hip replacement: A cohort analysis of 1,026,481 hip replacements from the National Joint Registry.在初次全髋关节置换术后,与翻修风险相关的承窝材料的相关性:来自国家关节登记处的 1,026,481 例髋关节置换的队列分析。
PLoS Med. 2024 Nov 7;21(11):e1004478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004478. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Comparative postoperative prognosis of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene for total hip arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.陶瓷对陶瓷和陶瓷对聚乙烯全髋关节置换术后预后的比较:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2024 Sep 25;12:e18139. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18139. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Complications and Costs of Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Propensity Score-Matched, Population-Based Study.比较全髋关节置换术与人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的并发症和成本:基于倾向评分匹配的人群研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Apr 3;101(7):572-579. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00539.
2
Choice of Prosthetic Implant Combinations in Total Hip Replacement: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using UK and Swedish Hip Joint Registries Data.全髋关节置换术中假体组合的选择:使用英国和瑞典髋关节登记数据的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2019 Mar;22(3):303-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
3
Updates on Biomaterials Used in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA).
全髋关节置换术(THA)中使用的生物材料的最新进展。
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;15(15):3278. doi: 10.3390/polym15153278.
4
Revision in Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Bearing in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Press-fit Cups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Different Methodological Study Designs.初次全髋关节置换中采用压配型髋臼杯的陶瓷对陶瓷和陶瓷对聚乙烯关节面的翻修:不同方法学研究设计的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022 Nov;10(11):916-936. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2022.59354.2933.
Temporal trends and survivorship of total hip arthroplasty in very young patients: a study using the National Joint Registry data set.
非常年轻患者全髋关节置换术的时间趋势和生存情况:一项使用国家关节登记数据集的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1320-1329. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2017-1441.R2.
4
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty after Ceramic Bearing Fractures in Patients Under 60-years Old; Mid-term Results.60岁以下患者陶瓷轴承骨折后的全髋关节翻修术;中期结果
Hip Pelvis. 2018 Sep;30(3):156-161. doi: 10.5371/hp.2018.30.3.156. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
Total hip arthroplasty: Survival and modes of failure.全髋关节置换术:生存率及失败模式。
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 May 21;3(5):232-239. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170068. eCollection 2018 May.
6
The Ideal Total Hip Replacement Bearing Surface in the Young Patient: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Alumina Ceramic-On-Ceramic With Ceramic-On-Conventional Polyethylene: 15-Year Follow-Up.年轻患者理想的全髋关节置换轴承表面:一项前瞻性随机试验比较氧化铝陶瓷-陶瓷与陶瓷-传统聚乙烯:15 年随访结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1752-1756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.066. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
8
Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: Results of a multicenter prospective randomized study and update of modern ceramic total hip trials in the United States.全髋关节置换术中陶瓷对陶瓷与陶瓷对聚乙烯轴承的比较:一项多中心前瞻性随机研究的结果及美国现代陶瓷全髋关节试验的更新
Hip Int. 2005 Jul-Sep;15(3):129-135. doi: 10.1177/112070000501500301.
9
A randomised, controlled clinical study on total hip arthroplasty using 4 different bearings: results after 10 years.
Hip Int. 2017 Feb 21;27(1):96-103. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000428. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
10
Cost Analysis of Ceramic Heads in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中陶瓷股骨头的成本分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Nov 2;98(21):1794-1800. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00831.