• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南亚平衡养分管理创新的发展:来自孟加拉国、印度、尼泊尔和斯里兰卡的观点

Development of balanced nutrient management innovations in South Asia: Perspectives from Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka.

作者信息

Kishore Avinash, Alvi Muzna, Krupnik Timothy J

机构信息

International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), NAS Complex, New Delhi, 110008, India.

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Sustainable Intensification Program, Dhaka, 1213, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Glob Food Sec. 2021 Mar;28:100464. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100464.

DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100464
PMID:33738185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7937784/
Abstract

Imbalanced application of fertilizers is a major fiscal and environmental problem in South Asia. We review fertilizer policies and extension efforts to promote the balanced application of nutrients in Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka and draw 4 important lessons. (1) Fertilizer sector reforms need to be fiscally sustainable and politically feasible. Governments in South Asia have abolished fertilizer subsidies on multiple occasions, only to restore them a few years later. (2) The use of phosphate and potash did not decline much even after a sharp increase in their prices in India in 2011-12. Therefore, rationalizing subsidies, while necessary, may not be sufficient to ensure balanced use of fertilizers. Changing farmers' practice requires combining the right incentives with the right information. (3) Soil test based soil health cards (SHC) hold promise, but there is limited evidence on their utility. India's SHC program had very little impact on fertilizer use. (4) Direct cash transfer (DCT) of fertilizer subsidies can reduce distortions, but Sri Lanka's experience shows that implementing it is more challenging than universal subsidies. DCT requires the removal of price controls, integration of land records, farmer identity cards, a cash transfer system with universal coverage, and a competitive fertilizer retail sector.

摘要

化肥施用不均衡是南亚地区一个主要的财政和环境问题。我们回顾了孟加拉国、印度、尼泊尔和斯里兰卡为促进养分均衡施用所采取的肥料政策及推广措施,并总结出四点重要经验教训。(1)肥料行业改革需要在财政上具有可持续性且在政治上具有可行性。南亚各国政府曾多次取消肥料补贴,但几年后又予以恢复。(2)即便2011 - 2012年印度磷钾肥价格大幅上涨,其使用量也并未显著下降。因此,尽管合理化补贴很有必要,但可能不足以确保肥料的均衡使用。改变农民的做法需要将正确的激励措施与正确的信息相结合。(3)基于土壤测试的土壤健康卡(SHC)前景可期,但关于其效用的证据有限。印度的土壤健康卡计划对肥料使用的影响甚微。(4)肥料补贴的直接现金转移支付(DCT)可以减少扭曲现象,但斯里兰卡的经验表明,实施该措施比普遍补贴更具挑战性。直接现金转移支付要求取消价格管制、整合土地记录、农民身份证、具有普遍覆盖范围的现金转移支付系统以及具有竞争力的肥料零售行业。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3f9/7937784/62694f0178fa/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3f9/7937784/80c690af9c63/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3f9/7937784/78360b337602/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3f9/7937784/62694f0178fa/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3f9/7937784/80c690af9c63/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3f9/7937784/78360b337602/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3f9/7937784/62694f0178fa/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of balanced nutrient management innovations in South Asia: Perspectives from Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Sri Lanka.南亚平衡养分管理创新的发展:来自孟加拉国、印度、尼泊尔和斯里兰卡的观点
Glob Food Sec. 2021 Mar;28:100464. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100464.
2
Factors affecting farmers' use of organic and inorganic fertilizers in South Asia.影响南亚农民使用有机和无机肥料的因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(37):51480-51496. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13975-7. Epub 2021 May 13.
3
Fertility levels and trends in South Asia: an assessment and prospects.南亚的生育水平与趋势:评估与展望
Genus. 1992 Jan-Jun;48(1-2):133-54.
4
Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer.农业补贴对化肥使用的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
5
Analysis of stakeholders networks of infant and young child nutrition programmes in Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Bangladesh and Pakistan.斯里兰卡、印度、尼泊尔、孟加拉国和巴基斯坦婴幼儿营养项目的利益相关者网络分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 13;17(Suppl 2):405. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4337-1.
6
Does dual reduction in chemical fertilizer and pesticides improve nutrient loss and tea yield and quality? A pilot study in a green tea garden in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China.化肥和农药双减是否能提高养分流失和茶叶产量与质量?来自中国浙江绍兴绿茶园的一项试点研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jan;26(3):2464-2476. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3732-1. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Rural-urban migration, informal sector and development policies: a theoretical analysis.城乡人口迁移、非正规部门与发展政策:理论分析
J Dev Econ. 1993 Jun;41(1):137-51. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(93)90040-t.
8
Small businesses, potentially large impacts: The role of fertilizer traders as agricultural extension agents in Bangladesh.小企业,潜在的巨大影响:肥料贸易商在孟加拉国作为农业推广机构的作用。
J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ. 2019;9(2):109-124. doi: 10.1108/JADEE-08-2017-0078. Epub 2019 May 15.
9
Sex preference in South Asia: Sri Lanka an outlier.南亚的性别偏好:斯里兰卡是个例外。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1995 Sep;10(3):5-16.
10
Effect of the grain-growing purpose and farm size on the ability of stable land property rights to encourage farmers to apply organic fertilizers.粮食种植目的和农场规模对稳定土地产权鼓励农民施用有机肥能力的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109621. Epub 2019 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Fertilizer use gaps of women-headed households under diverse rice-based cropping patterns: Survey-based evidence from the Eastern Gangetic Plain, South Asia.南亚恒河平原东部不同水稻种植模式下女性户主家庭的肥料使用差距:基于调查的证据
Heliyon. 2023 Feb 28;9(3):e14139. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14139. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Unbalanced fertilizer use in the Eastern Gangetic Plain: The influence of Government recommendations, fertilizer type, farm size and cropping patterns.恒河平原东部地区肥料使用失衡:政府建议、肥料类型、农场规模和种植模式的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 28;17(7):e0272146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272146. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Designing better input support programs: Lessons from zinc subsidies in Andhra Pradesh, India.设计更好的输入支持计划:来自印度安得拉邦锌补贴的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0242161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242161. eCollection 2020.
2
Agronomic, economic, and environmental performance of nitrogen rates and source in Bangladesh's coastal rice agroecosystems.孟加拉国沿海水稻农业生态系统中氮肥用量和来源的农艺、经济及环境绩效
Field Crops Res. 2019 Sep 1;241:107567. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107567.
3
Dataset on measuring perception about fertilizer subsidy policy and factors behind differential farm level fertilizer usage in Bangladesh.
Farmers' fertilizer use gaps relative to government recommendations in the saline coastal zone of the Ganges Delta.
恒河三角洲盐碱化沿海地区农民肥料使用量与政府建议量之间的差距。
Agron Sustain Dev. 2022;42(4):59. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00797-1. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
What influences Bangladeshi Boro rice farmers' adoption decisions of recommended fertilizer doses: A case study on Dinajpur district.影响孟加拉国波萝稻农采纳推荐施肥量的因素:以迪纳杰布尔区为例
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 7;17(6):e0269611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269611. eCollection 2022.
关于衡量孟加拉国肥料补贴政策认知以及农场层面肥料使用差异背后因素的数据集。
Data Brief. 2019 Jan 10;22:851-858. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.01.005. eCollection 2019 Feb.
4
Practices, perceptions, and implications of fertilizer use in East-Central China.中国中东部地区肥料使用的实践、认知及影响
Ambio. 2015 Nov;44(7):647-52. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0639-7. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
5
Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead.绿色革命:影响、局限及未来之路。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 31;109(31):12302-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912953109. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
6
Environmental science. Digital soil map of the world.环境科学。世界数字土壤图。
Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):680-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1175084.