Department of Economics, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 19;16(3):e0248288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248288. eCollection 2021.
Building on the epidemiological SIR model, we present an economic model with heterogeneous individuals deriving utility from social contacts creating infection risks. Focusing on social distancing of individuals susceptible to an infection we theoretically characterize the gap between private and social cost of contacts. Our main contribution is to quantify this gap by calibrating the model with unique survey data from Germany on social distancing and impure altruism from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The optimal policy is to drastically reduce contacts at the beginning to almost eradicate the epidemic and keep them at levels that contain the pandemic at a low prevalence level. We find that also in laissez faire, private protection efforts by forward-looking, risk averse individuals would have stabilized the epidemic, but at a much higher prevalence of infection than optimal. Altruistic motives increase individual protection efforts, but a substantial gap to the social optimum remains.
在流行病学 SIR 模型的基础上,我们提出了一个具有异质个体的经济模型,这些个体从创造感染风险的社会接触中获得效用。我们关注易感染个体的社交距离,从理论上刻画了个体接触的私人成本和社会成本之间的差距。我们的主要贡献是通过利用新冠疫情开始时德国关于社交距离和不纯利他主义的独特调查数据对模型进行校准,从而量化这一差距。最优政策是在疫情开始时大幅减少接触,几乎消灭疫情,并将接触保持在低流行水平,以遏制疫情。我们发现,即使在放任自由的情况下,前瞻性、规避风险的个体的私人保护措施也本可以稳定疫情,但感染的流行率要比最优水平高得多。利他主义动机增加了个体的保护力度,但与社会最优水平仍存在相当大的差距。