• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LI-RADS v2018 主要标准:非酒精性脂肪性肝炎中的肝细胞癌与病毒引起的慢性肝病的 MRI 表现有何不同?

LI-RADS v2018 major criteria: Do hepatocellular carcinomas in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis differ from those in virus-induced chronic liver disease on MRI?

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014, Paris, France; Université de Paris, 75006, Paris, France.

Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75014, Paris, France; Department of Radiology, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, 530000, Viet Nam.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2021 May;138:109651. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109651. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109651
PMID:33740627
Abstract

PURPOSE

LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic system is used to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in at risk patients. However, its applicability to HCC in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has not been specifically studied. The purpose of this study was to assess the applicability of LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic system for HCC in patients with NASH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MRI examinations of 41 patients with HCC and NASH (NASH group) were reviewed and compared to those obtained in 41 patients with HCC and virus-induced chronic liver disease (Virus group). MRI examinations of the two groups were compared for imaging presentation, LI-RADS major criteria and LI-RADS categorization. Qualitative variables were compared using Fisher exact test and quantitative variables using Mann-Whitney U test Interreader agreement was assessed using kappa statistic.

RESULTS

No significant differences in qualitative and quantitative variables were observed between the two groups. Most common findings in the two groups were hyperenhancement during the arterial phase and visibility on T2-weighted images (93 % vs. 98 %, P = 0.616 and 85 % vs. 88 %, P = 1.000 for NASH group and Virus group, respectively). No differences in prevalence between the two groups were found for any major LI-RADS v2018 criterion. Interreader agreement for LI-RADS categorization was strong for the NASH group (kappa = 0.802) and moderate for the virus group (kappa = 0.720). No differences were found between the two groups for LI-RADS categories (P =  0.303).

CONCLUSIONS

The LI-RADS v2018 diagnostic algorithm can be applied in patients with NASH.

摘要

目的

LI-RADS v2018 诊断系统用于诊断高危患者的肝细胞癌(HCC)。然而,其在非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)中的适用性尚未得到专门研究。本研究旨在评估 LI-RADS v2018 诊断系统在 NASH 患者 HCC 中的适用性。

材料和方法

回顾性分析 41 例 HCC 合并 NASH 患者(NASH 组)和 41 例 HCC 合并病毒诱导的慢性肝病患者(病毒组)的 MRI 检查结果,并进行比较。比较两组的影像学表现、LI-RADS 主要标准和 LI-RADS 分类。定性变量采用 Fisher 确切检验,定量变量采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验,采用 Kappa 统计评估观察者间一致性。

结果

两组间定性和定量变量无显著差异。两组最常见的发现是动脉期强化和 T2 加权图像上可见(93%对 98%,P=0.616 和 85%对 88%,NASH 组和病毒组分别为 P=1.000)。两组任何主要 LI-RADS v2018 标准的患病率均无差异。NASH 组 LI-RADS 分类的观察者间一致性较强(kappa=0.802),病毒组的观察者间一致性为中度(kappa=0.720)。两组 LI-RADS 分类之间无差异(P=0.303)。

结论

LI-RADS v2018 诊断算法可应用于 NASH 患者。

相似文献

1
LI-RADS v2018 major criteria: Do hepatocellular carcinomas in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis differ from those in virus-induced chronic liver disease on MRI?LI-RADS v2018 主要标准:非酒精性脂肪性肝炎中的肝细胞癌与病毒引起的慢性肝病的 MRI 表现有何不同?
Eur J Radiol. 2021 May;138:109651. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109651. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?动脉期增强程度和廓清率的定量评估是否能提高基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝脏病变分类?
Eur Radiol. 2020 May;30(5):2922-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06596-9. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
3
Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.基于 LI-RADS v2018 的肝细胞癌的 MRI 诊断性能,与 v2017 相比。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Sep;50(3):746-755. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26640. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.LI-RADS 版本 2018、LI-RADS 版本 2017 和 OPTN 标准用于诊断肝细胞癌的性能比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Nov;215(5):1085-1092. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.22772. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors.LI-RADS v2018 对除肝细胞癌(HCC)以外的原发性肝癌的评估:LI-RADS 目标人群与无 LI-RADS 定义的 HCC 风险因素患者的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):996-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06448-6. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
6
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.肝细胞癌(HCC)与非 HCC:肝脏影像报告和数据系统 v2018 的准确性和可靠性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jun;44(6):2116-2132. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01948-x.
7
Hepatic Steatosis Has No Effect in Diagnosis Accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 Categorization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MR Imaging.肝脂肪变对 MRI 诊断 LI-RADS v2018 肝细胞癌分类的准确率没有影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Jun;59(6):2060-2070. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27783. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
8
The role of lesion hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI as an additional major imaging feature for HCC classification using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.钆贝葡胺增强肝胆期 MRI 病变低信号强度在 LI-RADS v2018 标准中作为 HCC 分类的另一个主要影像学特征的作用。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):7715-7724. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07807-y. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MRI.LI-RADS 版本 2017 与版本 2018:钆塞酸二钠增强 MRI 诊断肝细胞癌。
Radiology. 2019 Sep;292(3):655-663. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182867. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Increasing the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for diagnosis of small (10-19 mm) HCC on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI.提高 LI-RADS v2018 对细胞外对比增强 MRI 中小肝癌(10-19mm)诊断的灵敏度。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Apr;46(4):1530-1542. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02790-2. Epub 2020 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Common pitfalls and diagnostic challenges in the application of LI-RADS CT/MRI algorithms: a comprehensive review.LI-RADS CT/MRI算法应用中的常见陷阱与诊断挑战:全面综述
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Dec 24. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04778-8.
2
Epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical aspects of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in MAFLD patients.代谢相关脂肪性肝病患者肝细胞癌的流行病学、病理生理学和临床特征。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Oct;18(Suppl 2):922-940. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10692-4. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
An Overview of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Focusing on Non-Cirrhotic NAFLD Patients: A Challenge for Physicians.
聚焦非肝硬化性非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者的肝细胞癌监测概述:医师面临的一项挑战
Biomedicines. 2023 Feb 16;11(2):586. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11020586.
4
Imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非酒精性脂肪性肝病和非酒精性脂肪性肝炎中肝细胞癌的影像学特征:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Jun;47(6):2089-2098. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03499-0. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors against Advanced or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期或转移性神经内分泌肿瘤的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 4;14(3):794. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030794.
6
Non-invasive imaging criteria for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis B.慢性乙型肝炎非肝硬化患者肝细胞癌诊断的非侵入性成像标准。
JHEP Rep. 2021 Sep 16;3(6):100364. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100364. eCollection 2021 Dec.