• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过迭代、以客户满意度调查为驱动的评估来改善姑息治疗咨询团队的持续质量。

Effect of continual quality improvement of palliative care consultation teams by iterative, customer satisfaction survey-driven evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Osaka Rosai Hospital, 1179-3 Nagasone-cho, Kita-ku, Sakai City, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 19;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00741-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-021-00741-2
PMID:33740950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7978439/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current consensus recognizes the benefits of early intervention in palliative care consultation teams (PCCTs). As consultants, we should now attempt to improve the quality of our teams by utilizing a method mainly used in the business field. We aimed to investigate the effects of iterative evaluation of customer satisfaction surveys, filled by physicians and ward nurses in this study, for quality improvement of PCCTs.

METHODS

In October 2019, the participants filled the first questionnaire survey about palliative care and PCCTs at a 678-bed hospital, and improvement areas were uncovered. Refinements were planned and implemented, and then reevaluated using the second questionnaire survey in March 2020.

RESULTS

In addition to the characteristics of our clients evaluated from approximately 500 valid responses, the first survey showed that the response rate of the questionnaire, knowledge of palliative care and PCCTs, and publicity of the PCCT were recognized as issues needing attention. We planned to contrive ways to collect questionnaires, hold monthly workshops for palliative care, launch newsletters of palliative care, and go on client rounds. The second survey revealed improvements in the physicians' response rate (p = 0.02), the accuracy rate of application of PCCTs in Japan (p < 0.01), and ward nurses' confidence in opioid use (p = 0.04) and tendency toward easier accessibility to the PCCT (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Continual quality improvements through iterative, customer satisfaction survey-driven evaluation are a widely established practice in the business field. By using this appropriately, we could enable PCCTs to improve their quality.

摘要

背景

目前的共识认识到在姑息治疗咨询团队(PCCT)中早期干预的益处。作为顾问,我们现在应该尝试通过主要用于商业领域的方法来提高团队的质量。我们旨在调查通过医生和病房护士在这项研究中填写的客户满意度调查的迭代评估对 PCCT 质量改进的影响。

方法

2019 年 10 月,参与者在一家拥有 678 张床位的医院填写了关于姑息治疗和 PCCT 的第一份问卷调查,并发现了改进领域。计划并实施了改进措施,然后在 2020 年 3 月使用第二份问卷调查进行重新评估。

结果

除了从大约 500 份有效回复中评估的客户特征外,第一次调查还表明,问卷的回复率、对姑息治疗和 PCCT 的了解以及 PCCT 的宣传被认为是需要关注的问题。我们计划设计方法来收集问卷、举办每月的姑息治疗研讨会、推出姑息治疗通讯,以及进行客户查房。第二次调查显示,医生的回复率(p=0.02)、日本 PCCT 的应用准确率(p<0.01)以及病房护士对阿片类药物使用的信心(p=0.04)和更容易获得 PCCT 的倾向(p=0.07)有所提高。

结论

通过迭代、客户满意度调查驱动的评估进行持续质量改进是商业领域广泛采用的做法。通过适当使用这种方法,我们可以提高 PCCT 的质量。

相似文献

1
Effect of continual quality improvement of palliative care consultation teams by iterative, customer satisfaction survey-driven evaluation.通过迭代、以客户满意度调查为驱动的评估来改善姑息治疗咨询团队的持续质量。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 19;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00741-2.
2
A Self-Check Program Targeting Quality Improvement in a Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Team, Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine: Issues Regarding Team Activities Identified through the Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle.以医院为基础的缓和医疗咨询团队质量改进的自我检查计划,日本缓和医疗学会:通过计划-执行-检查-行动循环确定的团队活动问题。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;23(3):359-367. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0236. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
3
Integration and activity of hospital-based palliative care consultation teams: the INSIGHT multicentric cohort study.基于医院的姑息治疗咨询团队的整合和活动:INSIGHT 多中心队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 May 30;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0209-9.
4
Multiple evaluation of a hospital-based palliative care consultation team in a university hospital: activities, patient outcome, and referring staff's view.多方位评估大学附属医院姑息治疗咨询团队:活动、患者预后及转诊医护人员的看法。
Palliat Support Care. 2010 Mar;8(1):49-57. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509990708. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
5
The self-perceived palliative care barriers and educational needs of clinicians working in hospital primary care teams and referral patterns: lessons learned from a single-center survey and cohort study.医院初级保健团队中临床医生自我认知的姑息治疗障碍、教育需求及转诊模式:来自单中心调查和队列研究的经验教训
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):2620-2637. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1706. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
6
Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams in Japan Using a Modified Delphi Method.日本采用改良 Delphi 法制定基于医院的姑息治疗咨询团队标准。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Nov;56(5):746-751.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
7
Palliative care consultation trajectories.姑息治疗会诊轨迹
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2014 Jun;31(4):459-63. doi: 10.1177/1049909113491455. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
8
Clinical findings of a palliative care consultation team at a comprehensive cancer center.一家综合癌症中心姑息治疗会诊团队的临床研究结果。
J Palliat Med. 2008 Mar;11(2):191-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0094.
9
Timing of Palliative Care Consultations and Recommendations: Understanding the Variability.姑息治疗会诊与建议的时机:理解变异性
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015 Nov;32(7):772-5. doi: 10.1177/1049909114543322. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
10
Late referrals to palliative care units in Japan: nationwide follow-up survey and effects of palliative care team involvement after the Cancer Control Act.日本晚期转诊至姑息治疗病房的情况:全国性随访调查及《癌症控制法》实施后姑息治疗团队参与的效果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Aug;38(2):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.09.011. Epub 2009 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
A Self-Check Program Targeting Quality Improvement in a Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Team, Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine: Issues Regarding Team Activities Identified through the Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle.以医院为基础的缓和医疗咨询团队质量改进的自我检查计划,日本缓和医疗学会:通过计划-执行-检查-行动循环确定的团队活动问题。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;23(3):359-367. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0236. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
2
Exploratory analyses of the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT): a randomized trial of early specialized palliative care plus standard care versus standard care in advanced cancer patients.丹麦缓和医疗试验(DanPaCT)的探索性分析:晚期癌症患者中早期专科缓和医疗加标准治疗与标准治疗的随机试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 May;28(5):2145-2155. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05021-7. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
User's guide to correlation coefficients.相关系数用户指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
4
Development of a Standard for Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Teams in Japan Using a Modified Delphi Method.日本采用改良 Delphi 法制定基于医院的姑息治疗咨询团队标准。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Nov;56(5):746-751.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
5
European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care.欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)关于支持和姑息治疗的立场文件。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):36-43. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx757.
6
Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation and 30-Day Readmissions in Oncology.肿瘤内科的住院患者舒缓治疗会诊与 30 天再入院率。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;21(1):62-68. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0172. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer.晚期癌症成年患者的早期姑息治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 12;6(6):CD011129. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011129.pub2.
8
How many people will need palliative care in 2040? Past trends, future projections and implications for services.2040年将有多少人需要姑息治疗?过去的趋势、未来的预测以及对服务的影响。
BMC Med. 2017 May 18;15(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0860-2.
9
Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.姑息治疗融入标准肿瘤学治疗中:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):96-112. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.1474. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
10
Referral criteria for outpatient specialty palliative cancer care: an international consensus.门诊专科姑息治疗癌症的转诊标准:国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):e552-e559. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30577-0.