• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院初级保健团队中临床医生自我认知的姑息治疗障碍、教育需求及转诊模式:来自单中心调查和队列研究的经验教训

The self-perceived palliative care barriers and educational needs of clinicians working in hospital primary care teams and referral patterns: lessons learned from a single-center survey and cohort study.

作者信息

van der Stap Lotte, de Nijs Ellen J M, Oomes Marleen, Juffermans Carla C M, Ravensbergen Willeke M, Luelmo Saskia A C, Horeweg Nanda, van der Linden Yvette M

机构信息

Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):2620-2637. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1706. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

DOI:10.21037/apm-20-1706
PMID:33474950
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within the generalist-plus-specialist palliative care model, palliative care is mainly provided by nurses and physicians of hospital primary care teams. Palliative care consultation teams (PCCTs) support these clinicians in adequately caring for patients with advanced illnesses. Our team started in 2012. The aim of this study was to assess the self-perceived barriers, educational needs and awareness of available palliative care support options among our hospital primary care teams. In addition, palliative care referral patterns were evaluated.

METHODS

Single-center mixed methods study. Outcomes of two surveys of primary care team clinicians (2012 and 2016) on barriers to palliative care, educational needs and awareness of palliative care support options were compared (chi-square, Mann-Whitney U tests, qualitative analysis). Palliative care referral characteristics were evaluated (2012-2017), including referral timing (survival since referral) (descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier methodology). Predictions of survival at referral were analyzed (weighted Kappa).

RESULTS

In 2012 and 2016, the most frequently reported barrier was the late initiation of the palliative care approach. Clinicians reported a need for education on physical symptom management and basic palliative care principles. Awareness of support options increased from 2012 to 2016, including improved familiarity with the PCCT (56% vs. 85%, P<0.001) and positive appraisal of the team (8% vs. 40% gave an 'excellent' rating, P<0.001). The use of national symptom management guidelines also improved (23% vs. 53%, P<0.001). Of 1,404 referrals, 86% were for cancer patients. Referrals increased by 28% (mean) per year. Medical oncology clinicians referred most frequently (27%) and increasingly early in the disease trajectory (survival ≥3 months after referral) (P=0.016). Median survival after referral was 0.9 (range, 0-83.3) months. Referring physicians overestimated survival in 44% of patients (kappa 0.36, 95% CI: 0.30-0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care team clinicians persistently reported needing support with basic palliative care skills. PCCTs should continuously focus on educating primary care teams and promoting the use of guidelines. Because physicians tend to overestimate survival and usually referred patients late for specialist palliative care, consultation teams should support primary care teams to identify, treat and refer patients with palliative care needs in a timely manner.

摘要

背景

在通科医生加专科医生的姑息治疗模式中,姑息治疗主要由医院基层医疗团队的护士和医生提供。姑息治疗咨询团队(PCCTs)为这些临床医生充分护理晚期疾病患者提供支持。我们的团队始于2012年。本研究的目的是评估我院基层医疗团队对姑息治疗支持选项的自我感知障碍、教育需求和认知度。此外,还对姑息治疗转诊模式进行了评估。

方法

单中心混合方法研究。比较了基层医疗团队临床医生两次调查(2012年和2016年)关于姑息治疗障碍、教育需求和姑息治疗支持选项认知度的结果(卡方检验、曼-惠特尼U检验、定性分析)。评估了姑息治疗转诊特征(2012 - 2017年),包括转诊时机(转诊后的生存时间)(描述性统计、卡普兰-迈耶方法)。分析了转诊时生存的预测情况(加权卡帕)。

结果

在2012年和2016年,最常报告的障碍是姑息治疗方法启动较晚。临床医生报告需要接受有关身体症状管理和基本姑息治疗原则的教育。从2012年到2016年,对支持选项的认知度有所提高,包括对PCCT的熟悉程度提高(56%对85%,P<0.001)以及对该团队的积极评价增加(8%对40%给予“优秀”评级,P<0.001)。国家症状管理指南的使用也有所改善(23%对53%,P<0.001)。在1404例转诊中,86%是癌症患者。转诊每年平均增加28%。肿瘤内科临床医生转诊最为频繁(27%),且在疾病进程中越来越早(转诊后生存≥3个月)(P = 0.016)。转诊后的中位生存时间为0.9(范围,0 - 83.3)个月。转诊医生在44%的患者中高估了生存时间(卡帕0.36,95%置信区间:0.30 - 0.42)。

结论

基层医疗团队临床医生一直报告需要基本姑息治疗技能方面的支持。PCCTs应持续专注于对基层医疗团队的教育并促进指南的使用。由于医生往往高估生存时间且通常较晚将患者转诊至专科姑息治疗,咨询团队应支持基层医疗团队及时识别、治疗和转诊有姑息治疗需求的患者。

相似文献

1
The self-perceived palliative care barriers and educational needs of clinicians working in hospital primary care teams and referral patterns: lessons learned from a single-center survey and cohort study.医院初级保健团队中临床医生自我认知的姑息治疗障碍、教育需求及转诊模式:来自单中心调查和队列研究的经验教训
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):2620-2637. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1706. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Integration and activity of hospital-based palliative care consultation teams: the INSIGHT multicentric cohort study.基于医院的姑息治疗咨询团队的整合和活动:INSIGHT 多中心队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 May 30;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0209-9.
3
Multiple evaluation of a hospital-based palliative care consultation team in a university hospital: activities, patient outcome, and referring staff's view.多方位评估大学附属医院姑息治疗咨询团队:活动、患者预后及转诊医护人员的看法。
Palliat Support Care. 2010 Mar;8(1):49-57. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509990708. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
4
Late referrals to palliative care units in Japan: nationwide follow-up survey and effects of palliative care team involvement after the Cancer Control Act.日本晚期转诊至姑息治疗病房的情况:全国性随访调查及《癌症控制法》实施后姑息治疗团队参与的效果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Aug;38(2):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.09.011. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
5
A Self-Check Program Targeting Quality Improvement in a Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation Team, Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine: Issues Regarding Team Activities Identified through the Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle.以医院为基础的缓和医疗咨询团队质量改进的自我检查计划,日本缓和医疗学会:通过计划-执行-检查-行动循环确定的团队活动问题。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;23(3):359-367. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0236. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
Specialist palliative care teams and characteristics related to referral rate: a national cross-sectional survey among hospitals in the Netherlands.专科姑息治疗团队及相关转诊率特征:荷兰全国医院横断面调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Nov 11;20(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00875-3.
7
The Magnitude and Effects of Early Integration of Palliative Care Into Oncology Service Among Adult Advanced Cancer Patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital.三级护理医院成年晚期癌症患者姑息治疗早期融入肿瘤服务的规模及效果
Cureus. 2021 May 29;13(5):e15313. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15313.
8
Effect of continual quality improvement of palliative care consultation teams by iterative, customer satisfaction survey-driven evaluation.通过迭代、以客户满意度调查为驱动的评估来改善姑息治疗咨询团队的持续质量。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 19;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00741-2.
9
Unlocking timely palliative care: assessing referral practices and barriers at a ghanaian teaching hospital.解锁及时的姑息治疗:评估加纳教学医院的转诊实践和障碍。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 5;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01411-9.
10
The Effect of Palliative Care Team Design on Referrals to Pediatric Palliative Care.姑息治疗团队设计对儿科姑息治疗转诊的影响。
J Palliat Med. 2016 Mar;19(3):286-91. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0261. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Timely integration of palliative care into oncology care for patients with bone metastases at the radiotherapy department: A pilot study on acceptability and feasibility.放疗科对骨转移癌患者姑息治疗与肿瘤治疗的及时整合:一项关于可接受性和可行性的初步研究
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jun 10;35:100317. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100317. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Association between Inappropriate End-of-Life Cancer Care and Specialist Palliative Care: A Retrospective Observational Study in Two Acute Care Hospitals.不适当的临终癌症护理与专科姑息治疗之间的关联:在两家急症医院开展的一项回顾性观察研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;16(4):721. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040721.
3
Assessment of patient symptom burden and information needs helps tailoring palliative care consultations: An observational study.
评估患者的症状负担和信息需求有助于调整姑息治疗咨询:一项观察性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13708. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13708. Epub 2022 Sep 24.