Naseem Sana, Zushi Yasuyuki, Nabi Deedar
Institute of Environmental Sciences and Engineering (IESE), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Research Institute of Science for Safety and Sustainability, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 16-1 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8569, Japan.
J Cheminform. 2021 Mar 19;13(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13321-021-00503-5.
The experimental values of skin permeability coefficients, required for dermal exposure assessment, are not readily available for many chemicals. The existing estimation approaches are either less accurate or require many parameters that are not readily available. Furthermore, current estimation methods are not easy to apply to complex environmental mixtures. We present two models to estimate the skin permeability coefficients of neutral organic chemicals. The first model, referred to here as the 2-parameter partitioning model (PPM), exploits a linear free energy relationship (LFER) of skin permeability coefficient with a linear combination of partition coefficients for octanol-water and air-water systems. The second model is based on the retention time information of nonpolar analytes on comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC). The PPM successfully explained variability in the skin permeability data (n = 175) with R = 0.82 and root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.47 log unit. In comparison, the US-EPA's model DERMWIN™ exhibited an RMSE of 0.78 log unit. The Zhang model-a 5-parameter LFER equation based on experimental Abraham solute descriptors (ASDs)-performed slightly better with an RMSE value of 0.44 log unit. However, the Zhang model is limited by the scarcity of experimental ASDs. The GC × GC model successfully explained the variance in skin permeability data of nonpolar chemicals (n = 79) with R = 0.90 and RMSE = 0.23 log unit. The PPM can easily be implemented in US-EPA's Estimation Program Interface Suite (EPI Suite™). The GC × GC model can be applied to the complex mixtures of nonpolar chemicals.
在进行皮肤暴露评估时,许多化学品的皮肤渗透系数实验值难以获取。现有的估算方法要么不够准确,要么需要许多难以获得的参数。此外,当前的估算方法不易应用于复杂的环境混合物。我们提出了两种模型来估算中性有机化学品的皮肤渗透系数。第一种模型,这里称为双参数分配模型(PPM),利用皮肤渗透系数与正辛醇 - 水和空气 - 水系统分配系数线性组合之间的线性自由能关系(LFER)。第二种模型基于非极性分析物在全二维气相色谱(GC×GC)上的保留时间信息。PPM成功解释了皮肤渗透性数据(n = 175)中的变异性,R = 0.82,均方根误差(RMSE)= 0.47对数单位。相比之下,美国环境保护局(US - EPA)的DERMWIN™模型的RMSE为0.78对数单位。基于实验性亚伯拉罕溶质描述符(ASD)的张模型(一个五参数LFER方程)表现稍好,RMSE值为0.44对数单位。然而,张模型受到实验性ASD稀缺的限制。GC×GC模型成功解释了非极性化学品皮肤渗透性数据(n = 79)中的方差,R = 0.90,RMSE = 0.23对数单位。PPM可以很容易地在美国环境保护局的估算程序接口套件(EPI Suite™)中实现。GC×GC模型可应用于非极性化学品的复杂混合物。