Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2480-2489. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
This study aimed to examine barriers and facilitators to the dissemination of efficacious self-directed digital health tools for adults affected by cancer, and quantify funding used to develop and evaluate these digital health tools.
We conducted: (1) a systematic literature review to identify efficacious self-directed digital health tools for adults affected by cancer, published between 2009 and 2019 and (2) an author survey to identify barriers and facilitators to dissemination of those tools, grant funding and the user centredness of their design (UCD) process.
Of 1314 screened articles, 29 articles describing 26 tools met the inclusion criteria. From 26 surveys sent, 12 were completed, 6 of which described disseminated tools. Whilst researchers' motivation and infrastructure support facilitate tool dissemination, limited funds, lack of infrastructure and limited research timelines are the most common barriers. A median of AUD$250,000 was spent on tools not disseminated to end-users.
Although incorporating UCD processes in the development of digital health tools is important, it is imperative to integrate implementation processes into the planning stages of tool development to ensure dissemination.
Researchers, academic institutions, funding agencies and government and non-government organisations all have roles to play to support long-term implementation.
本研究旨在探讨为癌症患者开发有效的自我指导型数字健康工具在传播过程中面临的障碍和促进因素,并量化用于开发和评估这些数字健康工具的资金。
我们进行了:(1)系统文献回顾,以确定 2009 年至 2019 年间发表的针对癌症成年患者的有效自我指导型数字健康工具;(2)作者调查,以确定这些工具传播的障碍和促进因素、资助资金以及其用户为中心的设计(UCD)过程。
在筛选出的 1314 篇文章中,有 29 篇文章描述了 26 种符合纳入标准的工具。在发出的 26 份调查中,有 12 份完成了调查,其中 6 份描述了已传播的工具。虽然研究人员的动机和基础设施支持促进了工具的传播,但资金有限、缺乏基础设施和研究时间有限是最常见的障碍。未向最终用户传播的工具中位数花费了 25 万澳元。
尽管在数字健康工具的开发中纳入 UCD 过程很重要,但必须将实施过程纳入工具开发的规划阶段,以确保传播。
研究人员、学术机构、资助机构以及政府和非政府组织都在发挥作用,以支持长期实施。