Centre for Educational Development, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1444-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08429-7. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Simulation-based surgical training (SBST) is key to securing future surgical expertise. Proficiency-based training (PBT) in laparoscopy has shown promising results on skills transfer. However, time constraints and limited possibilities for distributed training constitute barriers to effective PBT. Home-based training may provide a solution to these barriers and may be a feasible alternative to centralized training in times of assembly constraints.
We randomly assigned first-year trainees in abdominal surgery, gynecology, and urology to either centralized instructor-regulated training (CIRT) or home-based self-regulated training (HSRT) in laparoscopy. All participants trained on portable box trainers providing feedback on metrics and possibility for video reviewing. Training in both groups was structured as PBT with graded proficiency exercises adopted from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). The HSRT group trained at home guided by online learning materials, while the CIRT group attended two training sessions in the simulation center with feedback from experienced instructors. Performance tests consisted of hand-eye and bimanual coordination, suture and knot-tying, and FLS exercises. We analyzed passing rates, training time and distribution, and test performances.
Passing rates were 87% and 96% in the CIRT and HSRT group, respectively. HSRT facilitated distributed training and resulted in greater variation in training times. Task times for hand-eye and bimanual coordination were significantly reduced between pretest and posttest in both groups. Trainees maintained their posttest performances at the 6-month retention test. Our analyses revealed no significant inter-group differences in performances at pretest, posttest, or retention test. Performance improvements in the two groups followed similar patterns.
CIRT and HSRT in laparoscopy result in comparable performance improvements. HSRT in laparoscopy is a feasible and effective alternative to CIRT when offered inside a supportive instructional design. Further research is needed to clarify trainees' preferences and explore facilitators and barriers to HSRT.
基于模拟的手术培训(SBST)是确保未来手术专业技能的关键。基于熟练度的腹腔镜培训(PBT)在技能转移方面已取得了有希望的成果。然而,时间限制和分布式培训的可能性有限,这构成了有效 PBT 的障碍。家庭为基础的培训可能是解决这些障碍的一种方法,并且在组装约束的情况下可能是集中培训的可行替代方案。
我们将腹部手术、妇科和泌尿科的一年级受训者随机分配到集中指导员监管的培训(CIRT)或腹腔镜的家庭为基础的自我监管的培训(HSRT)中。所有参与者都在便携式箱式训练器上进行培训,该训练器提供有关度量标准和视频回顾可能性的反馈。两组的培训都采用了从腹腔镜基础技能(FLS)中采用的分级熟练度练习的 PBT 结构。HSRT 组在家中接受在线学习材料的指导下进行培训,而 CIRT 组则在模拟中心参加两次培训课程,由经验丰富的指导员提供反馈。绩效测试包括手眼和双手协调、缝合和打结以及 FLS 练习。我们分析了通过率、培训时间和分布以及测试表现。
CIRT 和 HSRT 组的通过率分别为 87%和 96%。HSRT 促进了分布式培训,并导致培训时间的差异更大。两组的手眼和双手协调任务时间在测试前和测试后均显著减少。受训者在 6 个月的保留测试中保持了他们的测试后表现。我们的分析显示,在测试前、测试后或保留测试中,两组之间的表现均无显著差异。两组的表现改善遵循相似的模式。
腹腔镜中的 CIRT 和 HSRT 导致了相当的表现改善。在提供支持性教学设计的情况下,腹腔镜内的 HSRT 是 CIRT 的一种可行且有效的替代方案。需要进一步的研究来阐明受训者的偏好,并探讨 HSRT 的促进因素和障碍。