• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过风险分类分析前列腺癌手术后的尿控恢复和肿瘤学结果:来自 LAParoscopic 前列腺切除术机器人和开放试验的结果。

Urinary continence recovery and oncological outcomes after surgery for prostate cancer analysed by risk category: results from the LAParoscopic prostatectomy robot and open trial.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Medicine, Surgery and Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.

Karolinska University Hospital, Eugeniavägen 3, 171 76, Solna, Sweden.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3239-3249. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03662-0. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03662-0
PMID:33743059
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate urinary continence (UC) recovery and oncological outcomes in different risk-groups after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed 2650 men with prostate cancer from seven open (n = 805) and seven robotic (n = 1845) Swedish centres between 2008 and 2011 in a prospective non-randomised trial, LAPPRO. UC recovery was defined as change of pads less than once in 24 h. Information was collected through validated questionnaires. Rate of positive surgical margins (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR), defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 0.25 mg/ml, were recorded. We stratified patients into two risk groups (low-intermediate and high risk) based on the D'Amico risk classification system.

RESULT

Among men with high-risk prostate cancer, we found significantly higher rates of UC recovery up to 24 months after RRP compared to RALP (66.1% vs 60.5%) RR 0.85 (CI 95% 0.73-0.99) while PSM was more frequent after RRP compared to RALP (46.8% vs 23.5%) RR 1.56 (CI 95% 1.10-2.21). In the same group no significant difference was seen in BCR. Overall, however, BCR was significantly more common after RRP compared to RALP at 24 months (9.8% vs 6.6%) RR 1.43 (Cl 95% 1.08-1.89). The limitations of this study are its non-randomized design and the relatively short time of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that men with high-risk tumour operated with open surgery had better urinary continence recovery but with a higher risk of PSM than after robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. No significant difference was seen in biochemical recurrence.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN06393679.

摘要

目的

评估机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)和开放式经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)后不同风险组的尿控恢复和肿瘤学结果。

患者和方法

我们分析了 2008 年至 2011 年间来自瑞典七个开放(n=805)和七个机器人(n=1845)中心的 2650 名前列腺癌患者,这是一项前瞻性非随机试验 LAPPRO。尿控恢复定义为 24 小时内更换尿垫次数少于一次。通过验证问卷收集信息。记录阳性手术切缘(PSM)和生化复发(BCR)率,BCR 定义为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)>0.25mg/ml。我们根据 D'Amico 风险分类系统将患者分为低-中危和高危两个风险组。

结果

在患有高危前列腺癌的男性中,我们发现 RRP 术后 24 个月的尿控恢复率明显高于 RALP(66.1% vs 60.5%)RR 0.85(95%CI 0.73-0.99),而 RRP 术后 PSM 发生率高于 RALP(46.8% vs 23.5%)RR 1.56(95%CI 1.10-2.21)。在同一组中,RRP 和 RALP 在 BCR 方面没有显著差异。然而,总体而言,RRP 术后 24 个月时 BCR 发生率明显高于 RALP(9.8% vs 6.6%)RR 1.43(95%CI 1.08-1.89)。这项研究的局限性在于其非随机设计和相对较短的随访时间。

结论

我们的研究表明,接受开放式手术治疗的高危肿瘤男性尿控恢复更好,但与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术相比,PSM 的风险更高。生化复发方面无显著差异。

试验注册

ISRCTN06393679。

相似文献

1
Urinary continence recovery and oncological outcomes after surgery for prostate cancer analysed by risk category: results from the LAParoscopic prostatectomy robot and open trial.通过风险分类分析前列腺癌手术后的尿控恢复和肿瘤学结果:来自 LAParoscopic 前列腺切除术机器人和开放试验的结果。
World J Urol. 2021 Sep;39(9):3239-3249. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03662-0. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
2
Functional and Oncological Outcomes After Open Versus Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer: 8-Year Follow-up.开放手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的功能和肿瘤学结局:8 年随访。
Eur Urol. 2021 Nov;80(5):650-660. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.025. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
3
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2.
4
Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术治疗后尿失禁和勃起功能障碍:一项前瞻性、对照、非随机试验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):216-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
5
Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial.在 Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO 试验中,前列腺癌开放式和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的健康经济学分析。
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):816-824. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.038. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
6
Posterior musculofascial reconstruction in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的后肌筋膜重建。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 8;8(8):CD013677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013677.pub2.
7
Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.在瑞典 LAPPRO 试验中,24 个月随访时开放与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的功能与肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
8
Surgeon heterogeneity significantly affects functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in the Swedish LAPPRO trial.在瑞典 LAPPRO 试验中,外科医生的异质性显著影响根治性前列腺切除术的功能和肿瘤学结果。
BJU Int. 2021 Mar;127(3):361-368. doi: 10.1111/bju.15238. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.经腹腔镜前列腺切除术机器人开放试验:开放耻骨后和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的勃起功能和肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):618-627. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
10
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Transversal approach via a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision versus standard approach of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis.经膀胱颈和前列腺联合纵行切口的横切入路与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的标准入路比较:回顾性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12015-0.
2
Comparative study of each surgical step in radical prostatectomy under 3D and 2D laparoscopy.三维与二维腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术各手术步骤的比较研究
Front Surg. 2024 Jan 31;11:1347583. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1347583. eCollection 2024.
3
Insights into urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: urgent urinary incontinence or stress urinary incontinence.
机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁的认识:急迫性尿失禁或压力性尿失禁。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3635-3642. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04584-9. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
4
Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:前瞻性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2617-2631. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01714-8. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Efficacy of the transvesical approach for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy a bladder neck and prostate combined longitudinal incision for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.经膀胱途径在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的疗效——膀胱颈与前列腺联合纵行切口治疗局限性前列腺癌
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1053140. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1053140. eCollection 2022.
6
Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中背侧血管复合体不结扎法及耻骨前列腺韧带和盆腔内筋膜的保留:对控尿的影响
Turk J Urol. 2022 Sep;48(5):331-338. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22113.
7
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Results from a Large Single-institution Series.保留雷济厄斯间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌患者:来自大型单机构系列研究的结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Mar 4;38:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.007. eCollection 2022 Apr.