College of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710054, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):38880-38900. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13275-0. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
There are two main categories of dryness monitoring indices based on spectral feature space. One category uses the vertical distance from any point to a line passing through the coordinate origin, which is perpendicular to a soil line, to monitor the dryness conditions. The most popular indices are the Perpendicular Dryness Index (PDI) and the modified perpendicular dryness index (MPDI). The other category uses the distance from any point in feature space to the coordinate origin to represent the dryness status, for instance, the soil moisture (SM) monitoring index (SMMI) and the modified soil moisture monitoring index (MSMMI). In this study, the performances and differences of these four indicators were evaluated using field-measured SM (FSM) data based on Gaofen-1 (GF-1) wide field of view (WFV), Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI), and Sentinel-2 Multi-Spectral Instrument (MSI) sensors. Performance evaluations were conducted in two study areas, namely an arid and semi-arid region of northwest China and a humid agricultural region of southwest Canada. We employed gradient-based structural similarity (GSSIM) to quantitatively assess the similarity of the structural information and structural characteristics among these four indicators. Monitoring SM in bare soil or low vegetation-covered areas in the semi-arid region, the SMMI, PDI, MSMMI, and MPDI from Near-Infrared (NIR)-Red had significantly negative linear correlations with the FSM at 0-5-cm depth (P < 0.01). However, SMMI was better than PDI in estimating SM in bare soil, which was better than MSMMI and MPDI for GF-1. Moreover, the PDI and SMMI had similar SM evaluation abilities, which were better than those of MPDI and MSMMI for Landsat-8. The GSSIM map of the SMMI/PDI and the MSMMI/MPDI showed that the low change areas accounted for 99.89% and 98.89% for GF-1, respectively, and 95.78% and 94.45% for Landsat-8, respectively. This result indicated that the SMMI, PDI, MSMMI, and MPDI values from NIR-Red in low vegetation cover were similar. In monitoring SM in agricultural vegetation areas, the accuracy of the four indices from Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR) feature space was higher than that from NIR-Red feature space for Sentinel-2. The SM monitoring effect of MSMMI and MPDI was better than that of SMMI and PDI. Due to the lack of SWIR band, GF-1 was limited in monitoring SM in vegetation-covered areas. The SMMI and MSMMI, which do not rely on the soil line, were more suitable than PDI and MPDI for retrieving SM in the complex surface environment depending on the soil line and the number of parameters. GF-1 with 16-m resolution had higher accuracy in SM assessment than Landsat-8 with 30-m resolution and had almost the same accuracy as Sentinel-2 with 20 m.
基于光谱特征空间,有两种主要的干燥度监测指标类别。一类使用从任意点到通过坐标原点垂直的土壤线的垂距来监测干燥度状况。最受欢迎的指标是垂直干燥度指数(PDI)和改进的垂直干燥度指数(MPDI)。另一类使用从特征空间中的任意点到原点的距离来表示干燥度状态,例如土壤水分(SM)监测指数(SMMI)和改进的土壤水分监测指数(MSMMI)。在这项研究中,使用基于高分一号(GF-1)宽视场(WFV)、陆地卫星 8 操作陆地成像仪(OLI)和哨兵 2 多光谱仪器(MSI)传感器的野外测量 SM(FSM)数据,评估了这四个指标的性能和差异。在两个研究区域进行了性能评估,即中国西北干旱半干旱地区和加拿大西南湿润农业区。我们使用基于梯度的结构相似性(GSSIM)来定量评估这四个指标之间结构信息和结构特征的相似性。在半干旱地区裸土或低植被覆盖地区监测 SM 时,NIR-Red 处的 SMMI、PDI、MSMMI 和 MPDI 与 0-5cm 深度的 FSM 呈显著负线性相关(P<0.01)。然而,SMMI 在估计裸土中的 SM 方面优于 PDI,而在 GF-1 中,SMMI 优于 MSMMI 和 MPDI。此外,PDI 和 SMMI 具有相似的 SM 评估能力,在 Landsat-8 中,PDI 和 SMMI 优于 MPDI 和 MSMMI。SMMI/PDI 和 MSMMI/MPDI 的 GSSIM 图表明,GF-1 的低变化区域占 99.89%和 98.89%,Landsat-8 的低变化区域占 95.78%和 94.45%。这一结果表明,在低植被覆盖下,NIR-Red 处的 SMMI、PDI、MSMMI 和 MPDI 值相似。在监测农业植被地区的 SM 时,对于 Sentinel-2,来自短波红外(SWIR)特征空间的四个指标的准确性高于来自 NIR-Red 特征空间的准确性。MSMMI 和 MPDI 的 SM 监测效果优于 SMMI 和 PDI。由于缺乏 SWIR 波段,GF-1 限制了对植被覆盖地区的 SM 监测。SMMI 和 MSMMI 不依赖于土壤线,与依赖土壤线和参数数量的 PDI 和 MPDI 相比,它们更适合于在复杂的地表环境中检索 SM。具有 16m 分辨率的 GF-1 在 SM 评估方面的精度高于具有 30m 分辨率的 Landsat-8,并且与具有 20m 分辨率的 Sentinel-2 的精度几乎相同。