• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

incorpoRATE 的制定:一项衡量医生将共同决策纳入实践意愿的指标。

The development of incorpoRATE: A measure of physicians' willingness to incorporate shared decision making into practice.

机构信息

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Williamson Translational Research Building, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Williamson Translational Research Building, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2327-2337. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.040. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.040
PMID:33744056
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop 'incorpoRATE', a brief and broadly applicable measure of physicians' willingness to incorporate shared decision making (SDM) into practice.

METHODS

incorpoRATE was developed across three phases: 1) A review of relevant literature to inform candidate domain and item development, 2) Cognitive interviews with US physicians to iteratively refine the measure, and 3) Pilot testing of the measure across a larger sample of US physicians to explore item and measure performance.

RESULTS

The final measure consists of seven items that assess physician perspectives on various components of SDM use that may present as barriers in practice. During pilot testing, the majority of physicians expressed positive opinions about the overall concept of SDM, yet were less comfortable acting on informed patient choices when there was known incongruence with their own recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

incorpoRATE is a novel physician-reported measure that assesses physicians' willingness to incorporate SDM in practice.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

incorpoRATE has the potential to help us further understand the limited adoption of SDM and areas of focus for improving the use of SDM in the future. We recommend that incorpoRATE be subject to further psychometric, real-world testing, in order to explore its performance across different samples of physicians and organizations.

摘要

目的

开发“incorpoRATE”,这是一种简短且广泛适用于衡量医生将共同决策(SDM)纳入实践意愿的工具。

方法

incorpoRATE 的开发分为三个阶段:1)对相关文献进行回顾,为候选领域和项目开发提供信息;2)对美国医生进行认知访谈,以迭代改进该工具;3)在更大的美国医生样本中对该工具进行试点测试,以探索项目和工具的性能。

结果

最终的工具由七个项目组成,评估医生对 SDM 使用的各个方面的看法,这些看法可能是实践中的障碍。在试点测试期间,大多数医生对 SDM 的总体概念表示了积极的看法,但当他们的建议与患者的知情选择不一致时,他们对采取行动就不太自在。

结论

incorpoRATE 是一种新颖的医生报告工具,用于评估医生在实践中整合 SDM 的意愿。

实践意义

incorpoRATE 有可能帮助我们进一步了解 SDM 的采用有限的情况,以及未来改善 SDM 使用的重点领域。我们建议对 incorpoRATE 进行进一步的心理测量学、真实世界的测试,以探索其在不同医生和组织样本中的表现。

相似文献

1
The development of incorpoRATE: A measure of physicians' willingness to incorporate shared decision making into practice. incorpoRATE 的制定:一项衡量医生将共同决策纳入实践意愿的指标。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2327-2337. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.040. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Measuring shared decision making in oncology: Development and first testing of the iSHAREpatient and iSHAREphysician questionnaires.测量肿瘤学中的共同决策:iSHAREpatient 和 iSHAREphysician 问卷的开发和初步测试。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):496-508. doi: 10.1111/hex.13015. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
3
A skills network approach to physicians' competence in shared decision making.技能网络方法在医生共同决策能力中的应用。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1466-1476. doi: 10.1111/hex.13130. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
4
Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.共同决策、医生的解释与治疗满意度:一项针对前列腺癌患者的横断面调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01355-z.
5
Using incorpoRATE to examine clinician willingness to engage in shared decision making: A study of Family Medicine residents.使用 incorpoRATE 评估家庭医学住院医师参与共享决策的意愿:一项研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3529-3533. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
PHYSICIAN CHARACTERISTICS THAT INFLUENCE PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCY.影响患者参与原发性免疫缺陷治疗的医生特征
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Nov;103(11):2280-2289. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.021. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
[Physicians' awareness and assessment of shared decision making in oncology practice.].[医生对肿瘤学实践中共同决策的认识与评估。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Oct 9;93:e201910066.
8
Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.患者和医生的性别以及对共同决策的看法:来自迪拜的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0270700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270700. eCollection 2022.
9
Shared decision making: Physicians' preferred role, usual role and their perception of its key components.共同决策:医生的偏好角色、通常角色及其对关键要素的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
10
Evaluating shared decision making for dialysis initiation: A qualitative study on patient refusal of long-term dialysis in Taiwan.评估透析起始的共同决策:台湾拒绝长期透析的患者的定性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;30(2):174-183. doi: 10.1111/jep.13922. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision making in routine oncology appointments with Black patients with lung cancer.在与肺癌黑人患者进行的常规肿瘤诊疗预约中进行共同决策。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 5;33(4):250. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09300-4.
2
Risk-Prediction Models for Clinical Decision-Making in Sarcoma Care: An International Survey Among Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Clinicians.肉瘤治疗中临床决策的风险预测模型:一项针对软组织肉瘤临床医生的国际调查
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2958-2970. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16849-7. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
3
Measuring healthcare professionals' perceptions of their ability to adopt shared decision making: Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the IcanSDM questionnaire.
测量医疗保健专业人员对采用共享决策能力的看法:丹麦版 IcanSDM 问卷的翻译及心理计量学评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02747-1.
4
What should educators teach to improve preventive health care?教育工作者应该教些什么来改善预防性医疗保健?
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Aug;68(8):583-588. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6808583.
5
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Aug;68(8):e241-e247. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6808e241.
6
Effectiveness and implementation of SHared decision-making supported by OUTcome information among patients with breast cancer, stroke and advanced kidney disease: SHOUT study protocol of multiple interrupted time series.基于结局信息的共享决策支持在乳腺癌、中风和晚期肾病患者中的效果及实施:一项多组间中断时间序列研究的 SHOUT 方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 1;12(8):e055324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055324.