• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于结局信息的共享决策支持在乳腺癌、中风和晚期肾病患者中的效果及实施:一项多组间中断时间序列研究的 SHOUT 方案

Effectiveness and implementation of SHared decision-making supported by OUTcome information among patients with breast cancer, stroke and advanced kidney disease: SHOUT study protocol of multiple interrupted time series.

机构信息

Santeon Hospital Group, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Santeon Hospital Group, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 1;12(8):e055324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055324.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055324
PMID:35914919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9345077/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Within the value-based healthcare framework, outcome data can be used to inform patients about (treatment) options, and empower them to make shared decisions with their health care professional. To facilitate shared decision-making (SDM) supported by outcome data, a multicomponent intervention has been designed, including patient decision aids on the organisation of post-treatment surveillance (breast cancer); discharge location (stroke) and treatment modality (advanced kidney disease), and training on SDM for health care professionals. The SHared decision-making supported by OUTcome information (SHOUT) study will examine the effectiveness of the intervention and its implementation in clinical practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Multiple interrupted time series will be used to stepwise implement the intervention. Patients diagnosed with either breast cancer (N=630), stroke (N=630) or advanced kidney disease (N=473) will be included. Measurements will be performed at baseline, three (stroke), six and twelve (breast cancer and advanced kidney disease) months. Trends on outcomes will be measured over a period of 20 months. The primary outcome will be patients' perceived level of involvement in decision-making. Secondary outcomes regarding effectiveness will include patient-reported SDM, decisional conflict, role in decision-making, knowledge, quality of life, preferred and chosen care, satisfaction with the intervention, healthcare utilisation and health outcomes. Outcomes regarding implementation will include the implementation rate and a questionnaire on the health care professionals' perspective on the implementation process.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Medical research Ethics Committees United in Nieuwegein, the Netherlands, has confirmed that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act does not apply to this study. Bureau Onderzoek & Innovatie of Santeon, the Netherlands, approved this study. The results will contribute to insight in and knowledge on the use of outcome data for SDM, and can stimulate sustainable implementation of SDM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL8374, NL8375 and NL8376.

摘要

简介

在基于价值的医疗保健框架内,结果数据可用于向患者提供(治疗)选择信息,并使他们能够与医疗保健专业人员共同做出决策。为了促进基于结果数据的共同决策(SDM),设计了一项多组分干预措施,包括关于治疗后监测(乳腺癌)、出院地点(中风)和治疗方式(晚期肾病)的组织的患者决策辅助工具,以及对医疗保健专业人员进行 SDM 的培训。SHared decision-making supported by OUTcome information (SHOUT) 研究将检验该干预措施及其在临床实践中的实施效果。

方法和分析

将使用多个中断时间序列逐步实施干预措施。将纳入诊断为乳腺癌(N=630)、中风(N=630)或晚期肾病(N=473)的患者。将在基线、三个月(中风)、六个月和十二个月(乳腺癌和晚期肾病)时进行测量。将在 20 个月的时间内测量结果趋势。主要结局是患者对决策参与度的感知程度。关于效果的次要结局包括患者报告的 SDM、决策冲突、决策中的角色、知识、生活质量、偏好和选择的护理、对干预的满意度、医疗保健利用和健康结果。关于实施的结局包括实施率和一份关于医疗保健专业人员对实施过程看法的问卷。

伦理和传播

荷兰乌得勒支联合医学伦理委员会已确认,本研究不适用《涉及人体医学研究的医疗研究伦理法》。荷兰的 Bureau Onderzoek & Innovatie of Santeon 批准了这项研究。研究结果将有助于深入了解和掌握基于结果数据的 SDM 应用,并能够促进 SDM 的可持续实施。

试验注册号

NL8374、NL8375 和 NL8376。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6782/9345077/30d74ed19c80/bmjopen-2021-055324f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6782/9345077/133764b65f60/bmjopen-2021-055324f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6782/9345077/e9bc02f36f9a/bmjopen-2021-055324f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6782/9345077/30d74ed19c80/bmjopen-2021-055324f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6782/9345077/133764b65f60/bmjopen-2021-055324f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6782/9345077/e9bc02f36f9a/bmjopen-2021-055324f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6782/9345077/30d74ed19c80/bmjopen-2021-055324f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and implementation of SHared decision-making supported by OUTcome information among patients with breast cancer, stroke and advanced kidney disease: SHOUT study protocol of multiple interrupted time series.基于结局信息的共享决策支持在乳腺癌、中风和晚期肾病患者中的效果及实施:一项多组间中断时间序列研究的 SHOUT 方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 1;12(8):e055324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055324.
2
Protocol for a pre-implementation and post-implementation study on shared decision-making in the surgical treatment of women with early-stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌女性手术治疗中共同决策的实施前与实施后研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 31;5(3):e007698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007698.
3
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
4
Shared Decision Making in mental health care using Routine Outcome Monitoring as a source of information: a cluster randomised controlled trial.将常规结果监测作为信息来源用于精神卫生保健中的共同决策:一项整群随机对照试验
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Dec 15;15:313. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0696-2.
5
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评估癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0740-y.
6
Personalized surveillance and aftercare for non-metastasized breast cancer: the NABOR study protocol of a multiple interrupted time series design.非转移性乳腺癌的个体化监测和随访:多时间序列设计的 NABOR 研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):1112. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11504-y.
7
Effectiveness, cost-utility and implementation of a decision aid for patients with localised prostate cancer and their partners: study protocol of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.局限性前列腺癌患者及其伴侣决策辅助工具的有效性、成本效益及实施:一项阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 15;7(9):e015154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015154.
8
Effect of a Skills Training for Oncologists and a Patient Communication Aid on Shared Decision Making About Palliative Systemic Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.肿瘤学家技能培训和患者沟通辅助工具对姑息性系统治疗决策共享的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e578-e588. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0453. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
9
Shared Decision Making in Health Care Visits for CKD: Patients' Decisional Role Preferences and Experiences.慢性肾脏病就诊中的共同决策:患者的决策角色偏好和体验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Dec;82(6):677-686. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
10
Evaluation of a shared decision-making strategy with online decision aids in surgical and orthopaedic practice: study protocol for the E-valuAID, a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design.评价一种在外科和骨科实践中应用在线决策辅助工具的共享决策策略:E-valuAID 多中心研究的研究方案,该研究采用逐步楔形设计。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 29;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01467-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The INFLUENCE 3.0 model: Updated predictions of locoregional recurrence and contralateral breast cancer, now also suitable for patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy.INFLUENCE 3.0模型:局部区域复发和对侧乳腺癌的更新预测,现在也适用于接受新辅助全身治疗的患者。
Breast. 2025 Feb;79:103829. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103829. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
'So Let's Go On Like This?'-Shared Decision-Making and the Use of Outcome Information in Routine Care Management for People With Multiple Sclerosis.“就这样继续下去吗?”-多发性硬化症常规护理管理中共享决策制定和结局信息的使用。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70009. doi: 10.1111/hex.70009.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Development of an online patient decision aid for kidney failure treatment modality decisions.开发一种在线患者决策辅助工具,用于治疗肾衰竭治疗方式的决策。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jul 6;23(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02853-0.
2
Development of a patient decision aid for discharge planning of hospitalized patients with stroke.开发一种针对住院脑卒中患者出院计划的患者决策辅助工具。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02679-1.
3
Comparison of the CollaboRATE and SDM-Q-9 questionnaires to appreciate the patient-reported level of shared decision-making.
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Dutch Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid including Personalized Risk Estimates in the SHOUT-BC Study: A Mixed Methods Approach.
在SHOUT-BC研究中对荷兰乳腺癌监测决策辅助工具(包括个性化风险评估)实施情况的评估:一种混合方法研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 31;16(7):1390. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071390.
4
Value-based healthcare implementation in the Netherlands: a quantitative analysis of multidisciplinary team performance.荷兰基于价值的医疗保健实施:多学科团队绩效的定量分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 21;24(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10712-x.
5
Personalized surveillance and aftercare for non-metastasized breast cancer: the NABOR study protocol of a multiple interrupted time series design.非转移性乳腺癌的个体化监测和随访:多时间序列设计的 NABOR 研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):1112. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11504-y.
6
Person-based co-design of a decision aid template for people with a genetic predisposition to cancer.为有癌症遗传易感性的人群进行基于个体的决策辅助模板协同设计。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Nov 23;4:1039701. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1039701. eCollection 2022.
7
Supporting Shared Decision-making About Surveillance After Breast Cancer With Personalized Recurrence Risk Calculations: Development of a Patient Decision Aid Using the International Patient Decision AIDS Standards Development Process in Combination With a Mixed Methods Design.通过个性化复发风险计算支持乳腺癌术后监测的共同决策:结合国际患者决策辅助工具标准制定流程和混合方法设计开发患者决策辅助工具
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Nov 14;8(4):e38088. doi: 10.2196/38088.
比较 CollaboRATE 和 SDM-Q-9 问卷,以了解患者报告的共享决策水平。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2475-2479. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Needs and preferences of breast cancer survivors regarding outcome-based shared decision-making about personalised post-treatment surveillance.乳腺癌幸存者对基于结局的个体化治疗后监测的共同决策的需求和偏好。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Oct;17(5):1471-1479. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01178-z. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
5
The new strategic agenda for value transformation.新的价值转化战略议程。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2022 Aug;35(3):189-193. doi: 10.1177/09514848211011739. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
6
The development of incorpoRATE: A measure of physicians' willingness to incorporate shared decision making into practice. incorpoRATE 的制定:一项衡量医生将共同决策纳入实践意愿的指标。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2327-2337. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.040. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
7
Redefining value: a discourse analysis on value-based health care.重新定义价值:基于价值的医疗保健的话语分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 14;20(1):862. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05614-7.
8
Informing Patients About Expected Outcomes: The Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap.向患者告知预期结果:疗效与效果的差距。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1651-1654. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02035. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients.在与患者的医疗接触中使用患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和共同决策:为患者提供基于价值的医疗服务的契机。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):524-540. doi: 10.1111/jep.13321. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
10
Implementation of a decision aid for localized prostate cancer in routine care: A successful implementation strategy.在常规护理中实施局部前列腺癌决策辅助工具:一项成功的实施策略。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Jun;26(2):1194-1207. doi: 10.1177/1460458219873528. Epub 2019 Sep 30.