Redmond M D, Rivner M H
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912-2323.
Muscle Nerve. 1988 May;11(5):511-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.880110515.
Of 50 normal subjects, 23 (46%) had at least one false positive electrodiagnostic test for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There were 30% of the subjects who exhibited an abnormal median to ulnar sensory amplitude ratio of less than 1.1. In 7 subjects 8 extremities (14%) revealed prolonged residual latencies, and 4 extremities in 4 subjects (8%) had a difference of 0.4 msec between the median and ulnar palmar sensory latencies. The results of this study indicate that certain reported criteria for CTS are abnormal in a high percentage of normal subjects, thereby making them of limited value in the diagnosis of CTS. Of all the criteria studied, it appears that the comparison of the median to ulnar sensory latency across the carpal tunnel is of greatest potential value. However, even here a more conservative difference of 0.5 msec between median and ulnar nerves must be used to avoid false positive tests for CTS.
在50名正常受试者中,23名(46%)至少有一项针对腕管综合征(CTS)的电诊断测试出现假阳性。30%的受试者表现出正中神经与尺神经感觉振幅比异常,小于1.1。7名受试者的8个肢体(14%)显示残余潜伏期延长,4名受试者的4个肢体(8%)正中神经与尺神经掌侧感觉潜伏期相差0.4毫秒。本研究结果表明,某些报告的CTS标准在高比例的正常受试者中是异常的,因此它们在CTS诊断中的价值有限。在所有研究的标准中,似乎腕管处正中神经与尺神经感觉潜伏期的比较具有最大的潜在价值。然而,即使在这里,正中神经和尺神经之间更保守的0.5毫秒差异也必须用于避免CTS的假阳性测试。