• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

林奇综合征先证者首次癌症与基因诊断之间的间隔。

Interval between the First Cancer and the Genetic Diagnosis in Lynch Syndrome Probands.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University, Japan.

Department of Medical Genetics, Sapporo Medical University, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2021 Sep 1;60(17):2719-2724. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6603-20. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.6603-20
PMID:33746161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8479221/
Abstract

Objective Little is known about the time from developing a first cancer to confirming the presence of a mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation for Lynch syndrome (LS) probands. Methods This was a retrospective single center study. LS probands, who have an MMR gene mutation that was confirmed first in a pedigree and thereafter developed at least one cancer, were included in this study. Results There were 21 LS probands who had developed at least one cancer; 6 with MLH1 mutations, 9 with MSH2 mutations, 4 with MSH6 mutations, and 2 with EPCAM deletions. The median ages at the first cancer and the genetic diagnosis were 47 (34-71) and 62 (38-84) years old, respectively. The mean interval between the first cancer and the genetic diagnosis was 11.0 (0-25) years, and 20 years or longer interval was required for the 5 probands. Six (28.6%) probands were older than 70 years, and 3 (14.3%) were in their 80s when they were diagnosed to have LS. The genetic diagnosis was confirmed at the first, second, third, and fourth cancer or later in 5, 5, 6, and 5 probands, respectively. Of the 16 cancers examined, 2 (12.5%) were microsatellite stable (MSS), both of whom had germline MSH6 mutations. All 17 LS probands who developed colorectal cancer met the revised Bethesda guidelines at the genetic diagnosis, but only 7 of 11 (63.6%) met them at the first cancer. Twelve out of 21 (57.1%) met the revised Amsterdam criteria. Conclusion It took 11 years for the LS probands from the first cancer to the diagnostic confirmation by genetic tests. A quarter of the probands were in their 70s or 80s at genetic diagnosis.

摘要

目的

对于林奇综合征(LS)先证者,从首次罹患癌症到证实错配修复(MMR)基因突变的时间尚不清楚。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心研究。本研究纳入了在一个家系中首先证实存在 MMR 基因突变,随后至少罹患一种癌症的 LS 先证者。

结果

共有 21 例 LS 先证者至少罹患了一种癌症;其中 6 例存在 MLH1 基因突变,9 例存在 MSH2 基因突变,4 例存在 MSH6 基因突变,2 例存在 EPCAM 缺失。首次癌症和遗传诊断的中位年龄分别为 47(34-71)岁和 62(38-84)岁。首次癌症与遗传诊断的平均间隔为 11.0(0-25)年,5 例先证者的间隔达到 20 年或更长。6 例(28.6%)先证者年龄超过 70 岁,3 例(14.3%)在 80 多岁时被诊断为 LS。5 例先证者的遗传诊断分别在首次、第二次、第三次和第四次癌症或更晚时得到证实,6 例先证者的遗传诊断在确诊为 LS 前已发生 2 次或更多次癌症。在 16 例癌症中,2 例(12.5%)为微卫星稳定(MSS),两者均存在胚系 MSH6 基因突变。所有 17 例发生结直肠癌的 LS 先证者在遗传诊断时均符合修订后的贝塞斯达指南,但仅 11 例(63.6%)在首次癌症时符合该指南。12/21(57.1%)例符合修订后的阿姆斯特丹标准。

结论

LS 先证者从首次癌症到基因检测确诊需要 11 年。四分之一的先证者在遗传诊断时已 70 多岁或 80 多岁。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/e958d5662714/1349-7235-60-2719-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/74fe424fd7c6/1349-7235-60-2719-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/4cdd14e40753/1349-7235-60-2719-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/7f1c90757f93/1349-7235-60-2719-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/e958d5662714/1349-7235-60-2719-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/74fe424fd7c6/1349-7235-60-2719-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/4cdd14e40753/1349-7235-60-2719-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/7f1c90757f93/1349-7235-60-2719-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6168/8479221/e958d5662714/1349-7235-60-2719-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Interval between the First Cancer and the Genetic Diagnosis in Lynch Syndrome Probands.林奇综合征先证者首次癌症与基因诊断之间的间隔。
Intern Med. 2021 Sep 1;60(17):2719-2724. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6603-20. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).林奇综合征(遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌)的筛查
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 5;352(18):1851-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043146.
3
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌:诊断策略及其影响。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 May(150):1-180.
4
Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers: frequency of germline mutations and identification of patients with Lynch-like syndrome.林奇综合征在子宫内膜癌中的普遍筛查:种系突变的频率及林奇样综合征患者的鉴定。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Dec;70:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
5
Comparison between universal molecular screening for Lynch syndrome and revised Bethesda guidelines in a large population-based cohort of patients with colorectal cancer.在一个大型基于人群的结直肠癌患者队列中,比较林奇综合征的通用分子筛查与修订后的贝塞斯达指南。
Gut. 2012 Jun;61(6):865-72. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300041. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
6
Lynch-like syndrome: characterization and comparison with EPCAM deletion carriers.林奇样综合征:特征及与EPCAM缺失携带者的比较。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;136(7):1568-78. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29133. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
7
Combined Microsatellite Instability, MLH1 Methylation Analysis, and Immunohistochemistry for Lynch Syndrome Screening in Endometrial Cancers From GOG210: An NRG Oncology and Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.联合微卫星不稳定性、MLH1甲基化分析及免疫组织化学用于妇科肿瘤学组GOG210子宫内膜癌林奇综合征筛查:一项NRG肿瘤学与妇科肿瘤学组研究
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4301-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9518. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
8
Identification of novel pathogenic MSH2 mutation and new DNA repair genes variants: investigation of a Tunisian Lynch syndrome family with discordant twins.鉴定新型致病性 MSH2 突变和新的 DNA 修复基因变异:对具有不一致双胞胎的突尼斯 Lynch 综合征家族的研究。
J Transl Med. 2019 Jun 27;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1961-9.
9
BRAF mutation analysis is a valid tool to implement in Lynch syndrome diagnosis in patients classified according to the Bethesda guidelines.BRAF突变分析是一种有效的工具,可用于对根据贝塞斯达指南分类的患者进行林奇综合征诊断。
Tumori. 2014 May-Jun;100(3):315-20. doi: 10.1700/1578.17214.
10
The contribution of Lynch syndrome to early onset malignancy in Ireland.林奇综合征在爱尔兰早发性恶性肿瘤中的作用。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 26;21(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08263-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Subtotal Colectomy for Colon Cancer Reduces the Need for Subsequent Surgery in Lynch Syndrome.结肠癌次全结肠切除术可减少林奇综合征患者后续手术的需求。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Aug;60(8):792-799. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000802.
2
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Patients With Lynch Syndrome.林奇综合征患者外科治疗临床实践指南
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Feb;60(2):137-143. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000785.
3
American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on the Diagnosis and Management of Lynch Syndrome.
美国胃肠病学会关于林奇综合征诊断与管理的指南
Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep;149(3):777-82; quiz e16-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.036. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
4
ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.ACG 临床指南:遗传性胃肠道癌综合征的基因检测与管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;110(2):223-62; quiz 263. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.435. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
5
Lynch syndrome caused by germline PMS2 mutations: delineating the cancer risk.胚系 PMS2 突变导致的林奇综合征:明确癌症风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 1;33(4):319-25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.8088. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
Cancer risks for MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers.MLH1 和 MSH2 突变携带者的癌症风险。
Hum Mutat. 2013 Mar;34(3):490-7. doi: 10.1002/humu.22262.
7
Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征中 MLH1、MSH2 和 MSH6 基因种系突变与癌症风险的相关性。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 8;305(22):2304-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.743.
8
Metachronous colorectal cancer risk for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: the advantage of more extensive colon surgery.错配修复基因突变携带者的结直肠重复癌风险:更广泛结肠手术的优势。
Gut. 2011 Jul;60(7):950-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.228056. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
9
Risk of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma after colectomy for colorectal cancer in patients meeting Amsterdam criteria.符合阿姆斯特丹标准的结直肠癌患者行结肠切除术治疗后结直肠腺瘤和癌的风险。
Ann Surg. 2010 Sep;252(3):507-11; discussion 511-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f20bd2.
10
The PREMM(1,2,6) model predicts risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 germline mutations based on cancer history.PREMM(1,2,6) 模型基于癌症病史预测 MLH1、MSH2 和 MSH6 种系突变的风险。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jan;140(1):73-81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.021. Epub 2010 Aug 19.