• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统甲状腺切除术后瘢痕满意度评估:随访结果

Scar satisfaction assessment after conventional thyroidectomy: follow-up results.

作者信息

Pradeep Puthen Veetil

机构信息

Department of Endocrine Surgery, Baby Memorial Hospital, Kozhikode, Kerala, India 673004.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021 Feb;41(1):39-42. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1141.

DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-N1141
PMID:33746221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7982762/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With the introduction of remote access thyroidectomy questions regarding patient satisfaction after trans-cervical thyroidectomy has been raised in several publications. As far as neck scars are concerned, patient satisfaction in the early post-operative period and long term are different. This study assessed patient satisfaction regarding their neck scar in the early post-operative period and at long term follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective study. Patients underwent total thyroidectomy by single surgeon. Scar satisfaction scores assessed at different time intervals (< 6 weeks, 6 months, 2 years and 5 years after procedure). Scores of patients aged < 35 years and > 35 years were compared. Patient and observer scar assessment scales (PSAS, OSAS) and patient satisfaction score (PSS) were used.

RESULTS

595 patients were included (443 females and 152 males, age 19-77 years). Improvement was observed in the PSAS (13.5 ± 2.3 at 6 weeks; to 4.32 ± 1.37 at 5 years; p < 0.05) and OSAS (7.32 ± 1.35 to 4.18 ± 1.51; p < 0.05). PSS improved over time from 1.8 ± 0.8 to 0.92 ± 0.66 (p < 0.05). The satisfaction scores were higher in patients < 35 years (p = 0.003). The scores indicated excellent patient satisfaction and are similar to those published in the literature regarding minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

CONCLUSIONS

Proper incision placement and suturing resulted in excellent patient satisfaction regarding scars after conventional thyroidectomy.

摘要

目的

随着远程接入甲状腺切除术的引入,经颈部甲状腺切除术后患者满意度的问题在一些出版物中被提出。就颈部疤痕而言,术后早期和长期的患者满意度有所不同。本研究评估了患者术后早期和长期随访时对颈部疤痕的满意度。

方法

回顾性研究。患者由单一外科医生进行全甲状腺切除术。在不同时间间隔(术后<6周、6个月、2年和5年)评估疤痕满意度评分。比较年龄<35岁和>35岁患者的评分。使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(PSAS、OSAS)以及患者满意度评分(PSS)。

结果

纳入595例患者(443例女性和152例男性,年龄19 - 77岁)。观察到PSAS有所改善(6周时为13.5±2.3;5年时为4.32±1.37;p<0.05)以及OSAS有所改善(从7.32±1.35至4.18±1.51;p<0.05)。PSS随时间从1.8±0.8改善至0.92±0.66(p<0.05)。<35岁患者的满意度评分更高(p = 0.003)。这些评分表明患者满意度极佳,且与文献中关于微创手术(MIS)的报道相似。

结论

正确的切口位置和缝合导致传统甲状腺切除术后患者对疤痕的满意度极佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0c7/7982762/3f25a5e5a8bf/aoi-2021-01-39-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0c7/7982762/3f25a5e5a8bf/aoi-2021-01-39-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0c7/7982762/3f25a5e5a8bf/aoi-2021-01-39-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Scar satisfaction assessment after conventional thyroidectomy: follow-up results.传统甲状腺切除术后瘢痕满意度评估:随访结果
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021 Feb;41(1):39-42. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1141.
2
Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale.美容原则指导甲状腺切除术,使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表评估可获得最佳美容效果。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3645-2.
3
Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study.微创与传统入路甲状旁腺切除术和甲状腺切除术手术中客观与主观瘢痕美学:一项配对队列研究
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;134(1):85-93. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.1.85.
4
Midcervical scar satisfaction in thyroidectomy patients.甲状腺切除患者的颈中部瘢痕满意度
Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1247-1252. doi: 10.1002/lary.26177. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
5
The long-term impact of neck scar satisfaction among thyroid surgery patients.甲状腺手术患者颈部瘢痕满意度的长期影响。
Endocr J. 2022 Jul 28;69(7):749-755. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ21-0577. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
6
Scars and satisfaction: do smaller scars improve patient-reported outcome?瘢痕与满意度:较小的瘢痕是否能改善患者报告的结局?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jan;269(1):309-13. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1613-z. Epub 2011 May 5.
7
Scar perceptions after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: comparison of minimal and conventional approaches.甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术后的疤痕感知:微创与传统方法的比较。
Surgery. 2013 Mar;153(3):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
8
A comparison of surgical morbidity and scar appearance between gasless, transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GTET) and minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (VAT).无气腔经腋窝内镜甲状腺切除术(GTET)与微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(VAT)的手术发病率和疤痕外观比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(2):646-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2613-y. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
9
Comparison of postoperative cosmesis in transaxillary, postauricular facelift, and conventional transcervical thyroidectomy.经腋路、耳后入路与传统经颈入路甲状腺切除术术后美容效果的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3388-3397. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07113-1. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
10
A prospective study to assess cervical scar satisfaction following conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer.一项前瞻性研究评估传统开放甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌后颈部疤痕满意度。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Aug;281(8):4363-4372. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08668-z. Epub 2024 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma on Thyroidectomy Scars: A Prospective Interventional Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.自体富血小板血浆对甲状腺切除术后瘢痕的影响:印度一家三级护理医院的前瞻性干预研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 5;17(6):e85404. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85404. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Redo Thyroidectomy: Updated Insights.再次甲状腺切除术:最新见解
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 10;13(18):5347. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185347.
3
The short-term outcomes of surgical scars in head and neck surgery comparing between surgical blade and geometric electron modulation electrocautery.

本文引用的文献

1
Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale.美容原则指导甲状腺切除术,使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表评估可获得最佳美容效果。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3645-2.
2
Vignette thyroid surgery: a glimpse into its history.甲状腺手术案例:窥探其历史
Int Surg. 2013 Jan-Mar;98(1):70-5. doi: 10.9738/CC185.1.
3
A comparison of surgical morbidity and scar appearance between gasless, transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GTET) and minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (VAT).
比较手术刀片和几何电子调制电灼在头颈部手术中对手术疤痕的短期效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Oct;281(10):5429-5436. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08771-1. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
4
A prospective study to assess cervical scar satisfaction following conventional open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer.一项前瞻性研究评估传统开放甲状腺切除术治疗甲状腺癌后颈部疤痕满意度。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Aug;281(8):4363-4372. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08668-z. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
5
The Attitudes of Patients Toward Orthopaedic Post-surgical Scars.患者对骨科手术后疤痕的态度。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 30;15(10):e47975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47975. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Remote-Access Thyroidectomy in the Pediatric Population: a Systematic Review.儿科人群中的远程接入甲状腺切除术:一项系统评价
Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1560-1570. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02429-w. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
无气腔经腋窝内镜甲状腺切除术(GTET)与微创视频辅助甲状腺切除术(VAT)的手术发病率和疤痕外观比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(2):646-52. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2613-y. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
4
Scars and satisfaction: do smaller scars improve patient-reported outcome?瘢痕与满意度:较小的瘢痕是否能改善患者报告的结局?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jan;269(1):309-13. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1613-z. Epub 2011 May 5.
5
A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices.瘢痕量表及瘢痕测量装置综述。
Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.
6
Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision.标准切口与小切口全髋关节置换术后疤痕的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:80-5. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000191317.85422.c3.
7
The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表:一种用于瘢痕评估的可靠且可行的工具。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.