• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注视与场景观察一致性之间的相互作用:来自年轻和老年成年人视觉搜索的证据。

The interplay between gaze and consistency in scene viewing: Evidence from visual search by young and older adults.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB24 3FX, UK.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):1954-1970. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02242-z. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-021-02242-z
PMID:33748905
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8213592/
Abstract

Searching for an object in a complex scene is influenced by high-level factors such as how much the item would be expected in that setting (semantic consistency). There is also evidence that a person gazing at an object directs our attention towards it. However, there has been little previous research that has helped to understand how we integrate top-down cues such as semantic consistency and gaze to direct attention when searching for an object. Also, there are separate lines of evidence to suggest that older adults may be more influenced by semantic factors and less by gaze cues compared to younger counterparts, but this has not been investigated before in an integrated task. In the current study we analysed eye-movements of 34 younger and 30 older adults as they searched for a target object in complex visual scenes. Younger adults were influenced by semantic consistency in their attention to objects, but were more influenced by gaze cues. In contrast, older adults were more guided by semantic consistency in directing their attention, and showed less influence from gaze cues. These age differences in use of high-level cues were apparent early in processing (time to first fixation and probability of immediate fixation) but not in later processing (total time looking at objects and time to make a response). Overall, this pattern of findings indicates that people are influenced by both social cues and prior expectations when processing a complex scene, and the relative importance of these factors depends on age.

摘要

在复杂场景中搜索目标会受到高级因素的影响,例如在该环境中搜索到该物品的可能性(语义一致性)。有证据表明,当一个人注视一个物体时,我们的注意力会被引导到该物体上。然而,之前很少有研究能够帮助我们理解如何整合自上而下的线索(如语义一致性和注视)来引导搜索目标时的注意力。此外,还有独立的证据表明,与年轻的同龄人相比,老年人可能更容易受到语义因素的影响,而不太容易受到注视线索的影响,但这在之前的综合任务中尚未得到研究。在目前的研究中,我们分析了 34 名年轻成年人和 30 名年长成年人在搜索复杂视觉场景中的目标物体时的眼动。年轻成年人的注意力会受到语义一致性的影响,但会更多地受到注视线索的影响。相比之下,年长成年人在引导注意力时更容易受到语义一致性的影响,并且受到注视线索的影响较小。这种在使用高级线索方面的年龄差异在早期处理(首次注视时间和立即注视的概率)中明显,但在后期处理(注视物体的总时间和做出反应的时间)中并不明显。总体而言,这种发现模式表明,当处理复杂场景时,人们会受到社会线索和先前预期的影响,这些因素的相对重要性取决于年龄。

相似文献

1
The interplay between gaze and consistency in scene viewing: Evidence from visual search by young and older adults.注视与场景观察一致性之间的相互作用:来自年轻和老年成年人视觉搜索的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):1954-1970. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02242-z. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
2
Influence of semantic consistency and perceptual features on visual attention during scene viewing in toddlers.语义一致性和感知特征对幼儿场景观看时视觉注意力的影响。
Infant Behav Dev. 2017 Nov;49:248-266. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.在随后的自由观看过程中,隐性感知到的物体吸引目光。
J Vis. 2009 Jun 10;9(6):6.1-12. doi: 10.1167/9.6.6.
4
Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.重力重要吗?语义和句法不一致对场景感知过程中注意力分配的影响。
J Vis. 2009 Mar 27;9(3):24.1-15. doi: 10.1167/9.3.24.
5
Quantifying task-related gaze.量化与任务相关的注视。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1318-1329. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02883-w. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
6
The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.场景要点及物体间空间依存关系在现实场景中注意力语义引导方面的作用。
Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
7
Gaze cues influence the allocation of attention in natural scene viewing.注视线索会影响自然场景观看中注意力的分配。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Dec;59(12):2056-64. doi: 10.1080/17470210600917884.
8
Complementary effects of gaze direction and early saliency in guiding fixations during free viewing.自由观看过程中注视方向和早期显著性在引导注视方面的互补作用。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 4;14(13):3. doi: 10.1167/14.13.3.
9
Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm.物体-场景不一致不会吸引注视:来自闪光预览移动窗口范式的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Aug;73(6):1742-53. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0150-6.
10
Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior.纠结于语义:无关的物体-场景不一致性的处理会调节正在进行的注视行为。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):154-168. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1203-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Competing Social and Symbolic Cues on Observers' Gaze Behaviour.竞争的社会和符号线索对观察者注视行为的影响。
Vision (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;8(2):23. doi: 10.3390/vision8020023.
2
Benchmarking Human Performance for Visual Search of Aerial Images.航空图像视觉搜索的人类性能基准测试
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 14;12:733021. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733021. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object-Scene Information.对象-场景信息语义整合过程中的与固定相关的脑电位。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Apr;32(4):571-589. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01504. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
2
How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables.在具备足够检验效能的实验中我们需要纳入多少参与者?一份带有参考表的检验效能分析教程。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):16. doi: 10.5334/joc.72.
3
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.
混合效应模型中的功效分析与效应量:教程
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 12;1(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.10.
4
Age-related differences during visual search: the role of contextual expectations and cognitive control mechanisms.年龄相关的视觉搜索差异:语境期望和认知控制机制的作用。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020 Jul;27(4):489-516. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2019.1632256. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
5
Mental states modulate gaze following, but not automatically.心理状态调节目光追随,但不是自动的。
Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.020. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
6
Alternative Models for Small Samples in Psychological Research: Applying Linear Mixed Effects Models and Generalized Estimating Equations to Repeated Measures Data.心理学研究中小样本的替代模型:将线性混合效应模型和广义估计方程应用于重复测量数据
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Feb;76(1):64-87. doi: 10.1177/0013164415580432. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
7
The elephant in the room: Inconsistency in scene viewing and representation.房间里的大象:场景观看与呈现中的不一致性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Oct;43(10):1717-1743. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000456.
8
A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)临界值的重新审视。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;33(2):379-388. doi: 10.1002/gps.4756. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
9
The functional consequences of social distraction: Attention and memory for complex scenes.社交干扰的功能后果:对复杂场景的注意力和记忆
Cognition. 2017 Jan;158:215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
10
Own-age biases in adults' and children's joint attention: Biased face prioritization, but not gaze following!成人和儿童共同注意中的同年龄偏差:偏向面部优先选择,但并非目光追随!
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Feb;71(2):372-379. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1247899. Epub 2018 Jan 1.