Ioannidou Flora, Hermens Frouke
School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK.
Vision (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;8(2):23. doi: 10.3390/vision8020023.
The effects of social (eye gaze, pointing gestures) and symbolic (arrows) cues on observers' attention are often studied by presenting such cues in isolation and at fixation. Here, we extend this work by embedding cues in natural scenes. Participants were presented with a single cue (Experiment 1) or a combination of cues (Experiment 2) embedded in natural scenes and were asked to 'simply look at the images' while their eye movements were recorded to assess the effects of the cues on (overt) attention. Single-gaze and pointing cues were fixated for longer than arrows but at the cost of shorter dwell times on the cued object. When presented together, gaze and pointing cues were fixated faster and for longer than simultaneously presented arrows. Attention to the cued object depended on the combination of cues and whether both cues were directed towards or away from the target object. Together, the findings confirm earlier observations that people attract attention more strongly than arrows but that arrows more strongly direct attention.
社会线索(目光注视、指示手势)和符号线索(箭头)对观察者注意力的影响通常是通过在孤立状态下且在注视点呈现这些线索来进行研究的。在此,我们通过将线索嵌入自然场景来拓展这项工作。向参与者呈现嵌入自然场景中的单个线索(实验1)或线索组合(实验2),并要求他们“只需看着这些图像”,同时记录他们的眼动,以评估线索对(显性)注意力的影响。与箭头相比,单一的目光注视和指示线索的注视时间更长,但代价是对被提示物体的停留时间更短。当目光注视和指示线索同时呈现时,其被注视的速度更快且时间更长,相比之下,同时呈现的箭头则不然。对被提示物体的注意力取决于线索的组合,以及两条线索是都指向目标物体还是都背离目标物体。总之,这些发现证实了早期的观察结果,即人们比箭头更能吸引注意力,但箭头更能有力地引导注意力。