School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;49(7):1159-1168. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004965.
To assess the risk of coronavirus transmission to healthcare workers performing aerosol-generating procedures and the potential benefits of personal protective equipment during these procedures.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched using a combination of related MeSH terms and keywords.
Cohort studies and case controls investigating common anesthetic and critical care aerosol-generating procedures and transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to healthcare workers were included for quantitative analysis.
Qualitative and quantitative data on the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus to healthcare workers via aerosol-generating procedures in anesthesia and critical care were collected independently. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions tool was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies.
Seventeen studies out of 2,676 yielded records were included for meta-analyses. Endotracheal intubation (odds ratio, 6.69, 95% CI, 3.81-11.72; p < 0.001), noninvasive ventilation (odds ratio, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.86-7.19; p < 0.001), and administration of nebulized medications (odds ratio, 10.03; 95% CI, 1.98-50.69; p = 0.005) were found to increase the odds of healthcare workers contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The use of N95 masks (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.39; p < 0.001), gowns (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48-0.73; p < 0.001), and gloves (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.29-0.53; p < 0.001) were found to be significantly protective of healthcare workers from contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Specific aerosol-generating procedures are high risk for the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from patients to healthcare workers. Personal protective equipment reduce the odds of contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
评估在进行产生气溶胶的程序时,冠状病毒传播给医护人员的风险,以及在此类程序中使用个人防护设备的潜在益处。
使用相关 MeSH 术语和关键词的组合,对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 进行了检索。
纳入了调查普通麻醉和重症监护中产生气溶胶的程序以及严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 1、中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 传播给医护人员的队列研究和病例对照研究。
独立收集了关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 1、严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 和中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒通过麻醉和重症监护中的产生气溶胶的程序传播给医护人员的定性和定量数据。使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险评估工具来评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
在 2676 项研究中,有 17 项研究符合纳入标准进行荟萃分析。气管插管(比值比,6.69,95%置信区间,3.81-11.72;p < 0.001)、无创通气(比值比,3.65;95%置信区间,1.86-7.19;p < 0.001)和雾化药物给药(比值比,10.03;95%置信区间,1.98-50.69;p = 0.005)被发现增加了医护人员感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 1 或严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的几率。使用 N95 口罩(比值比,0.11;95%置信区间,0.03-0.39;p < 0.001)、手术服(比值比,0.59;95%置信区间,0.48-0.73;p < 0.001)和手套(比值比,0.39;95%置信区间,0.29-0.53;p < 0.001)可显著保护医护人员免受严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 1 或严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的感染。
特定的产生气溶胶的程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 1 和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 从患者传播给医护人员的风险很高。个人防护设备降低了医护人员感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 1 和严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的几率。