Hakariya Hayase, Ozaki Akihiko, Hashimoto Takanao, Moriarty Frank, Maeda Hideki, Tanimoto Tetsuya
Interfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Institute for Pharmaceutical and Social Health Sciences, Ise, Japan.
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70243. doi: 10.1111/cts.70243.
It is unclear whether Japanese top-selling drugs have meaningful added therapeutic benefits to justify their high sales. This question is relevant as Japan's healthcare costs are rising consistently, particularly due to increasing drug prices. This cross-sectional study evaluated the added therapeutic benefits of Japan's top-selling drugs in 2021 using ratings from established health technology assessment (HTA) agencies in Canada, France, and Germany. Drug characteristics and benefit ratings were obtained from public databases and HTA agencies, following the established method. Overall, added therapeutic benefit ratings were categorized as binary (high or low). Of 51 identified top-selling drugs in Japan, 43 (86%) had at least one rating from three agencies. Notably, 20 (47%) received low added therapeutic benefit ratings even in our optimistic scenario. Low ratings were more common among small-molecule drugs 15/20 (75%), while high ratings were predominant among biologics 14/23 (61%). Oncology drugs represented the largest category in both high 9/23 (39%) and low 5/20 (25%) groups. Interestingly, 9 drugs (9/16; 56%) approved between 2011 and 2021 received low ratings, compared to 41% (11/27) of those approved before 2011. Additionally, 70% of high-benefit drugs received at least one expedited review, whereas this was 35% for low-benefit drugs. Our findings revealed that many top-selling drugs in Japan had low added therapeutic benefits. Utilizing HTA evaluation frameworks provides valuable insights, particularly in prioritizing drugs based on added therapeutic benefits. While full implementation of such a system in Japan requires further consideration, strengthening HTA processes could help ensure sustainable healthcare costs.
日本最畅销的药物是否具有显著的额外治疗益处,以证明其高销量的合理性,目前尚不清楚。鉴于日本的医疗成本持续上升,尤其是由于药品价格不断上涨,这个问题具有现实意义。这项横断面研究使用加拿大、法国和德国成熟的卫生技术评估(HTA)机构的评级,评估了2021年日本最畅销药物的额外治疗益处。按照既定方法,从公共数据库和HTA机构获取了药物特征和益处评级。总体而言,额外治疗益处评级分为两类(高或低)。在日本确定的51种最畅销药物中,43种(86%)至少有来自三个机构的一项评级。值得注意的是,即使在我们乐观的情景下,仍有20种(47%)获得了较低的额外治疗益处评级。小分子药物中低评级更为常见,为15/20(75%),而生物制剂中高评级占主导,为14/23(61%)。肿瘤药物在高评级组9/23(39%)和低评级组5/20(25%)中均占最大类别。有趣的是,2011年至2021年批准的9种药物(9/16;56%)获得了低评级,而2011年之前批准的药物这一比例为41%(11/27)。此外,70%的高益处药物至少接受了一次加速审评,而低益处药物的这一比例为35%。我们的研究结果显示,日本许多最畅销药物的额外治疗益处较低。利用HTA评估框架能提供有价值的见解,特别是在根据额外治疗益处对药物进行优先级排序方面。虽然在日本全面实施这样的系统需要进一步考虑,但加强HTA流程有助于确保医疗成本的可持续性。